| Literature DB >> 32545677 |
Reda M El-Shishtawy1, Mohammed M Rahman1, Tahir Ali Sheikh2, Muhammad Nadeem Arshad1, Fatimah A M Al-Zahrani3, Abdullah M Asiri1.
Abstract
A new electrochemical sensor of metal cation in an aqueous solution based on homobifunctionalEntities:
Keywords: 1,1'-(-((Disulfanediylbis(2,1-phenylene))bis(azaneylylidene))bis(methaneylylidene))bis(naphthalene-2-ol); Cr3+ ions; electrochemical method; environmental remediation; glassy carbon electrode; homobifunctional tridentate disulfide Schiff base
Year: 2020 PMID: 32545677 PMCID: PMC7345133 DOI: 10.3390/ma13122695
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Data and structure refinement for ATNA.
| CCDC Code (Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre) | 1953254 |
|---|---|
| Empirical formula | C34H24N2O2S2 |
| Formula weight | 556.67 |
| Temperature/K | 296(2) |
| Crystal system | triclinic |
| Space group | P-1 |
| a/Å | 8.6843(5) |
| b/Å | 11.8282(6) |
| c/Å | 13.5159(9) |
| α/° | 78.828(5) |
| β/° | 82.291(5) |
| γ/° | 86.223(4) |
| Volume/Å3 | 1348.59(14) |
| Z | 2 |
| ρcalcg/cm3 | 1.371 |
| μ/mm−1 | 0.233 |
| F(000) | 580.0 |
| Crystal size/mm3 | 0.22 × 0.17 × 0.12 |
| Radiation | MoKα (λ = 0.71073) |
| 2θ range for data collection/° | 5.942 to 58.364 |
| Index ranges | −11 ≤ h ≤ 7, −15 ≤ k ≤ 15, −17 ≤ l ≤ 18 |
| Reflections collected | 12,053 |
| Independent reflections | 6334 (Rint = 0.0338, Rsigma = 0.0553) |
| Data/restraints/parameters | 6334/0/361 |
| Goodness-of-fit on F2 | 1.031 |
| Final R indexes indexes (I>=2σ (I)) | R1 = 0.0538, wR2 = 0.1211 |
| Final R indexes (all data) | R1 = 0.1039, wR2 = 0.1544 |
| Largest diff. peak/hole / e Å−3 | 0.23/−0.27 |
Scheme 1Fabrication of glassy carbon electrode GCE modified by, 1′-(-((disulfanediylbis(2,1-phenylene))bis(azaneylylidene))bis(methaneylylidene))bis(naphthalene-2-ol) (ATNA) with the conducting binder, 5% Nafion.
Scheme 2(a) Synthesis of ATNA. (b) Suggested mechanism for the formation of ATNA.
Figure 1Attenuated total reflectance–Fourier transform infrared (ATR–FTIR) of the ATNA molecule.
Scheme 3Intramolecular hydrogen bonds in ATNA.
Figure 2Plot for ATNA with 50% probability of thermal ellipsoids.
Hydrogen bonds for ATNA.
| D | H | A | d(D-H)/Å | d(H-A)/Å | d(D-A)/Å | D-H-A/° |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O1 | H1O | N1 | 0.82 | 1.85 | 2.575(3) | 146.8 |
| O2 | H2O | N2 | 0.82 | 1.85 | 2.574(3) | 147.4 |
| O2 | H2O | S2 | 0.82 | 2.74 | 3.410(2) | 139.7 |
Figure 3A labeled diagram showing the intramolecular interactions and the formation of different ring motifs.
Figure 4Selectivity study: (a) current potential (I-V) response of the bare and coated GCE (ATNA/Nafion/GCE) in the presence and absence of Cr3+ ions as our target analyte at 0.1 µM, 25.0 µL; (b) I-V response with various analytes (showing affinity with Cr3+), concentration of each analyte was taken at (0.1 µM, 25.0 µL).
Figure 5Interference study: comparison of the I-V responses of the interfering heavy metal cations at potential (+1.1 V). Analytes concentrations were taken as 25 µL of 0.1 µM, delay time one second.
Interference effect of the various cations with ATNA/Nafion/GCE.
| Metal Ions | Observed Current (µA) | Interference Effect (%) | *SD (n= 3) | #RSD (%) (n = 3) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | R2 | R3 | Average | ||||
|
| 14.9618 | 14.8241 | 15.1423 | 14.9760 | 100 | 0.1595 | 1.07 |
|
| 5.2456 | 6.1323 | 5.8625 | 5.7468 | 38 | 0.4545 | 7.91 |
|
| 7.1919 | 7.2031 | 7.1879 | 7.1943 | 48 | 0.0078 | 0.11 |
|
| 6.1792 | 6.2955 | 6.0095 | 6.1614 | 41 | 0.1438 | 2.33 |
|
| 6.5441 | 6.6192 | 6.8994 | 6.6875 | 44 | 0.1872 | 2.80 |
|
| 6.3739 | 6.2084 | 6.3215 | 6.3012 | 42 | 0.0845 | 1.34 |
|
| 6.5512 | 6.4989 | 6.3003 | 6.4501 | 43 | 0.1323 | 2.05 |
|
| 4.0958 | 4.3853 | 4.8554 | 4.4455 | 29 | 0.3833 | 8.62 |
|
| 5.9285 | 5.7969 | 5.6714 | 5.7989 | 38 | 0.1285 | 2.22 |
|
| 5.8275 | 6.2791 | 6.3461 | 6.1509 | 41 | 0.2820 | 4.59 |
Interference effect of Cr3+ is considered to be 100%; R = reading; *SD = standard deviation; and #RSD = relative standard deviation.
Figure 6Control experiment: (a) the electrochemical responses of the bare GCE and the Nafion-coated GCE; and (b) the electrochemical responses of ATNA/Nafion/GCE in the presence of Cr3+ and Cr(VI).
Scheme 4Proposed mechanism of the probable interaction of Cr3+ with ATNA/Nafion/GCE: (a) the I-V response without Cr3+; (b) the I-V response with Cr3+; (c) the comparison of the I-V response with and without Cr3+; and (d) the probable π–π* interaction between the Cr3+ ions and ATNA.
Figure 7Optimization of the newly designed Cr3+ sensor: (a) the concentration variation plot of Cr3+ (0.1 M to 0.1 nM); and (b) the calibration plot (at + 1.1 V) of ATNA/Nafion/GCE.
Figure 8Repeatability and stability study: (a) the repeatability rest; and (b) the stability test of newly modified GCE (ATNA/Nafion/GCE as an efficient and sensitive Cr3+ cationic electrochemical sensor).
Figure 9Response time: (a) the evaluation of the scan rates against the potential applied (0–1.5 V); and (b) the response time from 10 to 20 s to reach the saturated steady state.
Comparison of the proposed I-V method with different previously reported analytical methods for the detection of Cr3+.
| Methods | Material | Sensitivity | *LDR | #LOD | @LOQ | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Tyrosinase biosensor | – | 2.0 × 10−4 M | 500.0 nM | – | [ |
|
| 1,2-Cyclohexanediaminetetraacetic acid (CDTA) | – | 0.0 M–0.0019 M | 961.6 nM | – | [ |
|
| Hexamolybdochromate | – | 5 × 10−6–1 × 10−5 M | 2000 nM | – | [ |
|
| Ethylene diamine tetra acetate (EDTA) | – | 0.0–1 × 10−6 M | 0.5 nM | – | [ |
|
| Gold nanoparticle-decorated titania nanotube arrays | 6.91 µAµM−1 | 0.10 µM–105 µM | 0.03 µM | – | [ |
|
| Nano TiO2 | – | 1 × 10−3–0.5 M | 0.11 nM | – | [ |
|
| Solid-phase hydrous ferric hydroxide (HFO) | – | 0.0–1.0 µM | 16.9 nM | – | [ |
|
| Ammonium pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate (APDC) | – | 190 nM–0.76 mM | 76,900–134,000 nM | – | [ |
|
| Micro-column of activated alumina | – | 0.0–1.9 × 10−5 M | 26.0 nM | – | [ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*LDR = linear dynamic ranger; #LOD = limit of detection; @LOQ = limit of quantification
Real sample analysis of Cr3+ in various environmental samples.
| Real Samples | Amount of 3-CP Added | No. of Readings | Measured Response in (µA) | % Recovery | Mean (% Recovery) | SD | RSD | SEM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.1 µM, 25 µL | - | 13.6808 | 100 | - | - | - | - |
|
| 0.1 µM, 25 µL | R1 | 13.2376 | 96.7 |
| 4.765 | 5.22 | 2.75 |
| R2 | 12.2129 | 89.3 | ||||||
| R3 | 12.0183 | 87.8 | ||||||
|
| 0.1 µM, 25.0 µL | R1 | 14.9859 | 109.5 |
| 3.143 | 2.95 | 1.81 |
| R2 | 14.6821 | 107.3 | ||||||
| R3 | 14.1258 | 103.3 | ||||||
|
| 0.1 µM, 25.0 µL | R1 | 12.1036 | 88.5 |
| 1.833 | 2.08 | 1.05 |
| R2 | 11.7748 | 86.1 | ||||||
| R3 | 12.2757 | 89.7 | ||||||
|
| 0.1 µM, 25.0 µL | R1 | 13.2457 | 96.8 |
| 1.850 | 1.89 | 1.06 |
| R2 | 13.6980 | 100.1 | ||||||
| R3 | 13.2682 | 97.0 |
SD = standard deviation; RSD = relative standard deviation; SEM = standard error of mean