| Literature DB >> 32545439 |
Dominika Czerwińska-Główka1, Wioletta Przystaś2,3, Ewa Zabłocka-Godlewska2,3, Sebastian Student3,4, Beata Cwalina2,3, Mieczysław Łapkowski1, Katarzyna Krukiewicz1.
Abstract
Due to its biocompatibility and advantageous electrochemical properties, platinum is commonly used in the design of biomedical devices, e.g., surgical instruments, as well as electro-medical or orthopedic implants. This article verifies the hypothesis that a thin layer of sputter-coated platinum may possess antibacterial effects. The purpose of this research was to investigate the adhesion and growth ability of a model strain of Gram-negative bacteria, Escherichia coli, on a surface of a platinum-coated glass slide. Although some previous literature reports suggests that a thin layer of platinum would inhibit the formation of bacterial biofilm, the results of this study suggest otherwise. The decrease in the number of bacterial cells attached to the platinum-coated glass, which was observed within first three hours of culturing, was found to be a short-time effect, vanishing after 24 h. Consequently, it was shown that a thin layer of sputter-coated platinum did not exhibit any antibacterial effect. For this reason, this study indicates an urgent need for the development of new methods of surface modification that could reduce bacterial surface colonization of platinum-based biomedical devices.Entities:
Keywords: Escherichia coli; antimicrobial properties; bacterial attachment; bacterial growth; glass; platinum; sputter-coating
Year: 2020 PMID: 32545439 PMCID: PMC7345058 DOI: 10.3390/ma13122674
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Homogeneity of a sputter-coated layer of platinum. Optical image of a Pt-coated glass slide and a SEM image as the inset.
Figure 2Surface hydrophilicity of investigated surfaces. (A) Behavior of a drop of water on the surface of a bare glass slide and (B) a Pt-coated glass slide.
Figure 3Colonization of Escherichia coli on the surfaces of bare and Pt-coated glass slides. (A) SEM micrographs presenting bacterial populations grown for 3 h, 24 h and 48 h on the surface of samples; (B) bacterial cells density (number of bacterial cells per 200 µm2) calculated from SEM images.
Figure 4Size distribution of bacterial cells on bare and Pt-coated glass slides. (A) SEM micrographs presenting bacterial populations grown for 3 h, 24 h and 48 h on bare and Pt-coated glass; (B) histograms of the bacterial cells percentage in terms of specified values of (C) length, width and (D) aspect ratio, calculated from SEM images; n = 150.
Average dimensions of bacterial cells. Comparison of average values of length, width and aspect ratio of bacteria cultured on bare and Pt-coated glass slides for 3 h, 24 h and 48 h; * = p < 0.05, n = 150.
| Surface | Glass | Platinum | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 3 | 24 | 48 | 3 | 24 | 48 |
|
| 2.00 ± 0.04 * | 1.94 ± 0.03 | 2.04 ± 0.04 * | 1.79 ± 0.03 * | 1.95 ± 0.03 | 1.90 ± 0.03 * |
|
| 0.77 ± 0.01 | 0.70 ± 0.01 * | 0.71 ± 0.01 | 0.75 ± 0.01 | 0.66 ± 0.01 * | 0.71 ± 0.01 |
|
| 0.40 ± 0.01 * | 0.37 ± 0.01 | 0.37 ± 0.01 | 0.43 ± 0.01 * | 0.35 ± 0.01 | 0.39 ± 0.01 |
Figure 5Viability of Escherichia coli on surfaces of glass and Pt-coated glass slides. (A) Confocal fluorescent microscopic images and (B) percentage values of live and dead bacteria after 3 h, 24 h and 48 h; * = p < 0.05, n = 8.