Literature DB >> 11700793

Bacterial adhesion to surface hydrophilic and hydrophobic contact lenses.

G M Bruinsma1, H C van der Mei, H J Busscher.   

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to determine the adhesion of two physico-chemically characterized bacterial strains to a surface hydrophilic (CL A, water contact angle 57 degrees) and hydrophobic (CL B, water contact angle 106 degrees) hydrogel contact lens (CL) with and without an adsorbed tear film in a parallel plate flow chamber. Hydrophobicity (by water contact angles), charge (by particulate microelectrophoresis) and elemental composition (by XPS) of the surfaces of seven bacterial strains were characterized, after which two strains were selected for further studies. On CL surfaces, hydrophobicity, elemental composition, and mean surface roughness (by AFM) were determined, as well as the protein composition of tear films adsorbed on these lenses (by sodium dodecylsulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE)). Bacterial cell surfaces were relatively uncharged and water contact angles on lawns of different strains ranged from hydrophobic to hydrophilic. After adsorption of tear film components, N/C elemental surface concentrations increased on CL A and CL B and differences in water contact angles between both lenses reduced to range from 57 degrees (CL A) to 69 degrees (CL B). However, different protein compositions were inferred. The surface roughness of CL A increased from 4 to 13 nm. while it remained 16 nm for CL B. Adhesion of hydrophobic Pseudomonas aeruginosa #3 was more extensive than of hydrophilic Staphylococcus aureus 799, with no differences between both lenses. The hydrophobicity of P. aeruginosa #3 after cell surface damage decreased and its adhesion was reduced on CL A and strongly on CL B. In addition, passage of an air-liquid interface yielded more detachment of S. aureus 799 than of P. aeruginosa #3 from the CL surfaces. In conclusion, the hydrophobicity of CL surfaces dictates the composition of the adsorbed tear film and therewith plays an important role in bacterial adhesion to lenses. Adhesion of hydrophobic P. aeruginosa #3 was more tenacious than of hydrophilic S. aureus 799.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11700793     DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00159-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  46 in total

1.  Comparison of velocity profiles for different flow chamber designs used in studies of microbial adhesion to surfaces.

Authors:  D P Bakker; A van der Plaats; G J Verkerke; H J Busscher; H C van der Mei
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Extensively and pan-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis: clinical features, risk factors, and outcome.

Authors:  Merle Fernandes; Divya Vira; Radhika Medikonda; Nagendra Kumar
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Acrylic scaffolds with interconnected spherical pores and controlled hydrophilicity for tissue engineering.

Authors:  R Brígido Diego; M Pérez Olmedilla; A Serrano Aroca; J L Gómez Ribelles; M Monleón Pradas; G Gallego Ferrer; M Salmerón Sánchez
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Dynamics of flagellum- and pilus-mediated association of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with contact lens surfaces.

Authors:  Victoria B Tran; Suzanne M J Fleiszig; David J Evans; Clayton J Radke
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Bacterial adhesion to conventional hydrogel and new silicone-hydrogel contact lens materials.

Authors:  Laurent Kodjikian; Emmanuelle Casoli-Bergeron; Florence Malet; Hélène Janin-Manificat; Jean Freney; Carole Burillon; Joseph Colin; Jean-Paul Steghens
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Enterococcal surface protein, Esp, enhances biofilm formation by Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  Preeti M Tendolkar; Arto S Baghdayan; Michael S Gilmore; Nathan Shankar
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  Impact of a rinse step on protein removal from silicone hydrogel contact lenses.

Authors:  Andrew D Pucker; Jason J Nichols
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Treatment, material, care, and patient-related factors in contact lens-related dry eye.

Authors:  Padmapriya Ramamoorthy; Loraine T Sinnott; Jason J Nichols
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  A two-week clinical evaluation of the safety of Systane Ultra in contact lens-wearing patients.

Authors:  David Kading
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-02-02

10.  Selective binding, self-assembly and nanopatterning of the Creutz-Taube ion on surfaces.

Authors:  Yuliang Wang; Marya Lieberman; Qingling Hang; Gary Bernstein
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 6.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.