| Literature DB >> 32545272 |
Hessa H Al H Al Rasheed1, Azizah M M Malebari2, Kholood A A Dahlous1, Ayman El-Faham1,3.
Abstract
A new series of s-triazine hydrazone derivatives was prepared based on the reaction of 6-hydrazino-2,4-disubstituted-s-triazine with p-substituted benzaldehyde derivatives using a straightforward synthetic pathway. The antiproliferative activity of all synthesized compounds was evaluated against two human cancer cell lines; breast cancer MCF-7 and colon carcinoma HCT-116 using MTT assay. Among all, 11 compounds have shown strong to moderate antiproliferative activity with IC50 values in the range 1.01-18.20 µM in MCF-7 and 0.97-19.51 µM in HCT-116. The best results were obtained with 4,4'-(6-(2-(pyridin-2-ylmethylene)hydrazinyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diyl) dimorpholine 11 (IC50 = 1.0 µM and 0.98 µM in MCF-7 and HCT-116 cell lines, respectively). The substituents on the s-triazine core as well as the substituent at the benzylidene moiety have a great effect on the antiproliferative activity. Whereas compounds containing dimorpholino-s-triazine derivatives 8a-e showed more potent antiproliferative in MCF-7 compared to their analogs 7a-f (compounds containing two-piperidine rings), compounds containing one piperidine and one morpholine ring 9a-f showed better IC50 values in the range 10.4-22.2 µM. On the other hand, compounds containing two-piperidine rings 7a-f showed more potent antiproliferative in HCT-116 (IC50 values in the range 8.8-19.5 µM) than their analogs 8a-e and 9a-f.Entities:
Keywords: HCT-116; MCF-7; antiproliferative activity; hydrazone derivatives; s-Triazine
Year: 2020 PMID: 32545272 PMCID: PMC7321239 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25112708
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Structure of the s-triazine hydrazone derivative with potent anticancer activity.
Scheme 1Synthetic route for preparation of the target products.
Structure of compounds 7a–f, 8a–e, 9a–f, and 10–12 as shown in Scheme 1.
| Cpd No. | R1 | R2 | X | Cpd No. | R1 | R2 | X |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| piperidine | piperidine | H | morpholine | piperidine | H | ||
| piperidine | piperidine | Cl | morpholine | piperidine | Cl | ||
| piperidine | piperidine | Br | morpholine | piperidine | Br | ||
| piperidine | piperidine | OH | morpholine | piperidine | OH | ||
| piperidine | piperidine | F | morpholine | piperidine | F | ||
| piperidine | piperidine | OCH3 | morpholine | piperidine | OCH3 | ||
| morpholine | morpholine | H | piperidine | piperidine | |||
| morpholine | morpholine | Cl | morpholine | morpholine | |||
| morpholine | morpholine | Br | morpholine | piperidine | |||
| morpholine | morpholine | OH | |||||
| morpholine | morpholine | F |
Figure 2Antiproliferative effect of compound 11 in MCF-7 and HCT-116 cell lines. Cells were grown in 96-well plates and treated with compound 11 at 0.05–100 μM for 72 h. Cell viability was expressed as a percentage of vehicle control [ethanol 0.1% (v/v)] treated cells. The values represent the mean ± S.E.M. for three independent experiments performed in triplicate.
Antiproliferative activities of compounds 7a–f, 8a–e, 9a–f, and 10–12 in MCF-7 and HCT-116 cell lines.
| Compound No. | IC50 (μM) MCF-7 | IC50 (μM) HCT-116 |
|---|---|---|
| 17.5 ± 5.9 | 12.6 ± 4.6 | |
| 23.5 ± 8.0 | 10.8 ± 3.5 | |
| 39.8 ± 12.9 | 10.9 ± 3.6 | |
| 18.2 ± 5.8 | 19.5 ± 6.2 | |
| 11.5 ± 3.3 | 14.0 ± 4.4 | |
| 39.9 ± 12.7 | 8.8 ± 2.5 | |
| 29.3 ± 9.3 | >50 | |
| 17.6 ± 5.7 | 19.2 ± 6.2 | |
| 23.2 ± 7.3 | 38.7 ± 12.4 | |
| 14.0 ± 4.8 | 29.9 ± 9.5 | |
| 13.4 ± 4.0 | 18.3 ± 5.7 | |
| 22.2 ± 7.9 | 44.2 ± 14.4 | |
| 21.9 ± 6.0 | 30.0 ± 9.6 | |
| 22.5 ± 3.9 | 28.2 ± 9.0 | |
| 10.4 ± 3.1 | 25.4 ± 8.2 | |
| 13.9 ± 4.7 | 22.0 ± 7.1 | |
| 14.2 ± 4.5 | 23.4 ± 7.4 | |
| 32.8 ± 10.4 | >50 | |
| 1.0 ± 0.3 | 0.98 ± 0.3 | |
|
| 17.7 ± 5.5 | 30.4 ± 9.9 |