| Literature DB >> 32543055 |
Xiaoxiang Song1,2, Xiaoyan Fang1,3,4, Xiaoshan Tang1,3,4, Qi Cao1,3,4, Yihui Zhai1,3,4, Jing Chen1,3,4, Jialu Liu1,3,4, Zhiqing Zhang1,3,4, Tianchao Xiang1,3,4, Yanyan Qian5, Bingbing Wu5, Huijun Wang5, Wenhao Zhou5, Cuihua Liu6, Qian Shen1,3,4, Hong Xu1,3,4, Jia Rao1,3,4,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mutations in COQ8B (*615567) as a defect of coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) cause steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS).Entities:
Keywords: COQ8B; CoQ10; proteinuria; steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS); transplantation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32543055 PMCID: PMC7434746 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1360
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Genet Genomic Med ISSN: 2324-9269 Impact factor: 2.183
FIGURE 1Exon capture and massively parallel sequencing reveal COQ8B mutations as causing SRNS and CKD. (a) Renal histology of individual C9 reveals FSGS by HE staining. (b) Renal histology of individual C9 shows FSGS and global glomerulosclerosis by Silver Jones Methenamine staining. (c) Renal histology of individual C9 shows foot process effacement. (d) Exon structure of human COQ8B cDNA. The COQ8B gene contains 15 exons. Positions of start codon (ATG) and of stop codon (TGA) are indicated. For the mutations detected (see f) arrows indicate positions in relation to exons and protein domains (see e). (e) Domain structure of the COQ8B protein. Extent of predicted domains, helical, ABC1, and kinase is depicted by colored bars, in relation to encoding exon position. (f) Nine different COQ8B mutations in 17 families with SRNS. Nucleotide change and amino acid changes (see Table S1) are given above sequence traces. Arrow heads denote altered nucleotides. Lines and arrows indicate positions of mutations in relation to exons (see d) and protein domains (see e). For the missense mutations, conservation across evolution of altered amino acid residues is shown. CKD, chronic kidney disease; FSGS, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis
The clinical feature of the patients with COQ8B nephropathy
| Early detection | Delayed detection |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients ( | 5 | 15 | |
| Female: Male | 2:3 | 7:8 | |
| Age onset (years) | 5.0 (2.5, 8.0) | 9.0 (3.0, 11.0) | .07 |
| Initial proteinuria (Up/Cr mmol/mmol) | 4.1 (3.3, 5.1) | 6.8 (4.0, 7.8) | .26 |
| Initial eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) | 115.0 (102.3, 118.0) | 110 (35.0, 118.0) | .25 |
| Age of genetic diagnosis (years) | 5.5 (3.1, 9.6) | 10.9 (7.7, 12.2) | .10 |
| Time from genetic diagnosis until end of follow‐up (years) | 4.0 (3.0, 6.5) | 4.5 (2.0, 6.0) | .73 |
Proteinuria was monitored by the urine protein/creatinine ratio (Up/c, mmol/mmol) of a morning‐void (Spot) specimen. Renal function was evaluated by estimated GFR (Schwartz formula eGFR = KL/Scr, with K = 0.49 in CKD1‐2, K = 0.36 in CKD3‐5). Data were shown as median with interquartile range (IQR). Quantitative value was compared by Mann–Whitney test indicated by p value.
FIGURE 2Renal outcome in COQ8B nephropathy. (a) Relationship between the disease onset and the time point at which WES performed (red vertical hatch) and relevant treatment events in 20 cases of COQ8B nephropathy. For each patient, the treatment of CoQ10 (red bar), the primary endpoint of end stage renal disease (ESRD, X), peritoneal dialysis (orange bar) and renal transplantation (green bar) were depicted. About 15 patients completed the genetic testing just before developing into ESRD or post dialysis. Five cases had been diagnosed of COQ8B nephropathy during an asymptomatic proteinuria period through urinary screening for siblings from the affected family, occasional urine test or urine screening in school. (b) Urinary protein level over the time of following CoQ10 initiation in five individuals genetic diagnosed with COQ8B mutation. After a median follow‐up duration of 21.0 (range from 12 to 24) months following CoQ10 administration, proteinuria decreased. The median Up/cre following CoQ10 supplementation and ACE inhibitor (Median 2.4; IQR 1.7–3.0; range 1.2–4.5) was significantly lower than that before CoQ10 treatment (Median 4.1; IQR 3.3–5.1; range 2.8–23.7) by Mann–Whitney test (p = .04). There was no significant difference of the proteinuria because the small sample size by Wilcoxon matched‐pairs single rank test. (c) Renal survival curve of patients with COQ8B nephropathy in comparison in the early detection group (n = 5, red) and the delayed detection group (n = 15, black). Whereas 15 cases in the delayed detection group had developed into ESRD (median interval from disease onset to ESRD was 7.8 months), only one case in the early detection group progressed into ESRD, which is significant (p = .043). ESRD, end‐stage renal disease
FIGURE 3Follow‐up of Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in the 7 patients with COQ8B glomerulopathy post kidney transplantation (a–c) and the 52 patients with non‐COQ8B glomerulopathy post kidney transplantation (d–f). Comparing the Z value of mean arterial pressure (MAP) for 24‐hr, daytime and nighttime during the period of pre‐transplant (pre‐Tx), 0–3 months posttransplant (post‐Tx0–3mon), 3–6 months posttransplant (post‐Tx3–6mon), 6–12 months posttransplant (post‐Tx6–12mon), 12–24 months posttransplant (post‐Tx12–24mon), 24–36 months posttransplant (post‐Tx24–36mon), and 36–48 months posttransplant (post‐Tx36–48mon) by Wilcoxon matched‐pairs single rank test. (a) Analysis Z value ofMAP for 24‐hr. There was no significant difference between the Z value of pre‐Tx and that of post‐Tx0–3mon or post‐Tx3–6mon (p = .297. p = .125). It was significant lower for the Z value of post‐Tx6–12mon compared with that of pre‐Tx (*p = .031). (b) Analysis Z value of MAP for daytime. It was significant lower for the Z value of post‐Tx0–3mon compared with that of pre‐Tx (*p = .0466.). It showed no significant difference for the Z value of post‐Tx3–6mon, or post‐Tx6–12mon compared with that of pre‐Tx (p = .062, p = .125). (c) Analysis Z value of mean arterial pressure (MAP) for nighttime. There was no significant difference between the Z value of pre‐Tx and that of post‐Tx0–3mon or that of post‐Tx3–6mon (p = .297; p = .438). It was significant lower for the Z value of post‐Tx6–12mon, or post‐Tx6–12mon compared with that of pre‐Tx (*p = .041). (d) Analysis Z value of MAPfor 24‐hr. It was significant lower for the Z value of that of post‐Tx0–3mon/post‐Tx3–6mon/post‐Tx6–12mon compared with that of pre‐Tx (*p = .0005, .0007, .0166). (e) Analysis Z value of MAP for daytime. It was significant lower for the Z value of post‐Tx0–3mon/post‐Tx3–6mon/post‐Tx6–12mon compared with that of pre‐Tx (*p = .0006, .0004, .0274). (f) Analysis Z value of mean arterial pressure (MAP) for nighttime. It was significant lower for the Z value of post‐Tx0–3mon/post‐Tx3–6mon/post‐Tx6–12mon compared with that of pre‐Tx (*p = .0008, .0002, .0053)