| Literature DB >> 32542006 |
Jose A Maldonado1, Thomas J Firneno1, Corey E Roelke1, Nathan D Rains2, Juliet Mwgiri1, Matthew K Fujita1.
Abstract
The continual loss of threatened biodiversity is occurring at an accelerated pace. High-throughput sequencing technologies are now providing opportunities to address this issue by aiding in the generation of molecular data for many understudied species of high conservation interest. Our overall goal of this study was to begin building the genomic resources to continue investigations and conservation of the Spot-Tailed Earless lizard. Here we leverage the power of high-throughput sequencing to generate the liver transcriptome for the Northern Spot-Tailed Earless Lizard (Holbrookia lacerata) and Southern Spot-Tailed Earless Lizard (Holbrookia subcaudalis), which have declined in abundance in the past decades, and their sister species, the Common Lesser Earless Lizard (Holbrookia maculata). Our efforts produced high quality and robust transcriptome assemblies validated by 1) quantifying the number of processed reads represented in the transcriptome assembly and 2) quantifying the number of highly conserved single-copy orthologs that are present in our transcript set using the BUSCO pipeline. We found 1,361 1-to-1 orthologs among the three Holbrookia species, Anolis carolinensis, and Sceloporus undulatus. We carried out dN/dS selection tests using a branch-sites model and identified a dozen genes that experienced positive selection in the Holbrookia lineage with functions in development, immunity, and metabolism. Our single-copy orthologous sequences additionally revealed significant pairwise sequence divergence (~.73%) between the Northern H. lacerata and Southern H. subcaudalis that further supports the recent elevation of the Southern Spot-Tailed Earless Lizard to full species.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32542006 PMCID: PMC7295237 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234504
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Schematic overview of our workflow to assemble the transcriptome of H. lacerata, H. subcaudalis, and H. maculata, and analysis carried out in this study.
Assembly statistics for H. maculata, H. lacerata, and H. subcaudalis.
| Transcriptome sequencing and assembly statistics | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 93,688,798 | 73,668,784 | 66,629,872 | |
| 93,464,743 | 73,492,888 | 66,508,242 | |
| 2,407 | 2,288 | 2,056 | |
| 107,385 | 99,821 | 91,278 | |
| 17,863 bp | 20,377 bp | 16,777 bp | |
| 224 bp | 224 bp | 224 bp | |
| 1,061 bp | 1,037 bp | 953 bp | |
| 43% | 43% | 42% |
Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO) summary of complete, duplicated, fragmented, and missing orthologs search against the 3950 single-copy orthologs.
| BUSCO statistics | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2,764 | 2,727 | 2,372 | |
| 2,627 | 2,604 | 2,259 | |
| 137 | 123 | 113 | |
| 345 | 392 | 465 | |
| 841 | 831 | 1,113 |
Fig 2Venn diagram showing the number of shared orthologous groups identified by OrthoFinder between all four species assembled transcriptome.
The alternative and null model likelihood values for the twelve genes that show footprints of positive selection in the Holbrookia lineage.
| Gene | Alternative Log Likelihood | Null Log Likelihood | Unadjusted P-Values | Adjusted P-Values | BEB scores for positive sites |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -1236.0192 | -1245.697904 | 1.08E-05 | 7.70E-04 | N 0.996 | |
| N 0.986 | |||||
| N 0.986 | |||||
| -3224.401186 | -3232.500738 | 5.70E-05 | 4.39E-03 | P 0.939 | |
| Q 0.938 | |||||
| -2022.830549 | -2036.859674 | 1.18E-07 | 9.09E-06 | G 0.975 | |
| E 0.950 | |||||
| E 0.995 | |||||
| -3332.16336 | -3342.054215 | 8.68E-06 | 6.68E-04 | Q 0.980 | |
| A 0.921 | |||||
| -2900.33107 | -2907.152926 | 0.00022098 | 1.69E-02 | G 0.947 | |
| S 0.942 | |||||
| N 0.977 | |||||
| -1161.470425 | -1170.150278 | 3.09E-05 | 2.38E-03 | P 0.861 | |
| A 0.867 | |||||
| -1337.215619 | -1344.793392 | 9.90E-05 | 7.62E-03 | Q 0.925 | |
| -761.2579 | -788.429241 | 1.68E-13 | 1.29E-11 | Q 0.988 | |
| I 0.999 | |||||
| C 0.999 | |||||
| V 0.999 | |||||
| D 0.999 | |||||
| A 0.993 | |||||
| C 0.994 | |||||
| T 0.999 | |||||
| -2724.823688 | -2731.69004 | 0.000210753 | 1.62E-02 | T 0.914 | |
| Q 0.970 | |||||
| -1661.883638 | -1669.365305 | 0.000109621 | 8.47E-03 | E 0.975 | |
| -1070.037763 | -1079.230221 | 1.80E-05 | 1.54E-03 | P 0.972 | |
| S 0.985 | |||||
| -1077.189311 | -1086.384783 | 1.80E-05 | 1.39E-03 | A 0.921 | |
| R 0.953 | |||||
| P 0.951 |
The uncorrected pairwise distance calculated across all orthologous gene sets between all species.
| Pairwise Distance | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | |||||
| 11.29% | 0 | ||||
| 11.10% | 5.58% | 0 | |||
| 11.27% | 5.56% | 1.53% | 0 | ||
| 11.29% | 5.57% | 1.50% | 0.73% | 0 |
Fig 3Gene ontology annotations for the liver transcriptome of H. maculata (yellow), H. subcaudalis (red), and H. lacerata (blue).