Literature DB >> 32537092

Evaluation of an Omnibus Mand in the Treatment of Multiply Controlled Destructive Behavior.

Daniel R Mitteer1, Wayne W Fisher1, Adam M Briggs1, Brian D Greer1, Alexandra M Hardee1.   

Abstract

Functional communication training is a commonly used and effective treatment for socially reinforced destructive behavior. However, when a functional analysis suggests that destructive behavior is multiply controlled (e.g., by attention, tangibles, and escape), teaching and evaluating separate functional communication responses (FCRs) can be time-consuming or only partially effective when failing to address multiple establishing operations that may occur simultaneously. We evaluated the use of an omnibus FCR or mand that produced access to attention, tangibles, and escape within each functional-analysis test condition for two boys with autism spectrum disorder who displayed multiply controlled destructive behavior. The omnibus-FCR treatment produced low rates of destructive behavior and high percentages of independent FCRs within each condition for both children, suggesting that such a treatment option may reduce destructive behavior and teach communication skills quickly prior to introducing other treatment components, such as teaching individual FCRs to address each unique function of destructive behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  functional analysis; functional communication response; functional communication training; multiple control; omnibus mand

Year:  2019        PMID: 32537092      PMCID: PMC7292531          DOI: 10.1037/bdb0000088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Dev Bull        ISSN: 1942-0722


  43 in total

1.  Competition between positive and negative reinforcement in the treatment of escape behavior.

Authors:  J S Lalli; T R Vollmer; P R Progar; C Wright; J Borrero; D Daniel; C H Barthold; K Tocco; W May
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1999

2.  The problem of parental nonadherence in clinical behavior analysis: effective treatment is not enough.

Authors:  K D Allen; W J Warzak
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

3.  Behavioral treatment of self-injury, 1964 to 2000.

Authors:  SungWoo Kahng; Brian A Iwata; Adam B Lewin
Journal:  Am J Ment Retard       Date:  2002-05

Review 4.  Functional analysis of problem behavior: a review.

Authors:  Gregory P Hanley; Brian A Iwata; Brandon E McCord
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

5.  Achieving socially significant reductions in problem behavior following the interview-informed synthesized contingency analysis: A summary of 25 outpatient applications.

Authors:  Joshua Jessel; Einar T Ingvarsson; Rachel Metras; Hillary Kirk; Ruth Whipple
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2018-01-10

6.  A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.

Authors:  W Fisher; C C Piazza; L G Bowman; L P Hagopian; J C Owens; I Slevin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

7.  Assessment and treatment of problem behavior occasioned by interruption of free-operant behavior.

Authors:  Louis P Hagopian; Jennifer L Bruzek; Lynn G Bowman; Heather K Jennett
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2007

8.  Comparisons of standardized and interview-informed synthesized reinforcement contingencies relative to functional analysis.

Authors:  Brian D Greer; Daniel R Mitteer; Adam M Briggs; Wayne W Fisher; Andrew J Sodawasser
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2019-07-07

9.  The functions of self-injurious behavior: an experimental-epidemiological analysis.

Authors:  B A Iwata; G M Pace; M F Dorsey; J R Zarcone; T R Vollmer; R G Smith; T A Rodgers; D C Lerman; B A Shore; J L Mazalesk
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1994

10.  Comparisons of synthesized and individual reinforcement contingencies during functional analysis.

Authors:  Wayne W Fisher; Brian D Greer; Patrick W Romani; Amanda N Zangrillo; Todd M Owen
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2016-05-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.