OBJECTIVE: To describe the first series of cases of autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) in collagen membrane performed in Brazil. METHODS: ACI was performed in 12 knees of 11 patients, aged 32.1 ± 10.9 years, with 5.3 ± 2.6 cm2 full-thickness knee cartilage lesions, with a six-month minimum follow-up. Two surgical procedures were performed: arthroscopic cartilage biopsy for isolation and expansion of chondrocytes, which were seeded onto collagen membrane and implanted in the lesion site; the characterization of cultured cells and implant was performed using immunofluorescence for type II collagen (COL2) for cell viability and electron microscopy of the implant. Clinical safety, KOOS and IKDC scores and magnetic resonance imaging were evaluated. We used repeated-measures ANOVA and post-hoc comparisons at α = 5%. RESULTS: COL2 was identified in the cellular cytoplasm, cell viability was higher than 95% and adequate distribution and cell adhesion were found in the membrane. The median follow-up was 10.9 months (7 to 19). We had two cases of arthrofibrosis, one of graft hypertrophy and one of superficial infection as complications, but none compromising clinical improvement. KOOS and IKDC ranged from 71.2 ± 11.44 and 50.72 ± 14.10, in preoperative period, to 85.0 ± 4.4 and 70.5 ± 8.0, at 6 months (p = 0.007 and 0.005). MRI showed regenerated tissue compatible with hyaline cartilage. CONCLUSION: ACI in collagen membrane was feasible and safe in a short-term follow-up, presenting regenerated formation visualized by magnetic resonance imaging and improved clinical function. Level of evidence IV, Case series.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the first series of cases of autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) in collagen membrane performed in Brazil. METHODS: ACI was performed in 12 knees of 11 patients, aged 32.1 ± 10.9 years, with 5.3 ± 2.6 cm2 full-thickness knee cartilage lesions, with a six-month minimum follow-up. Two surgical procedures were performed: arthroscopic cartilage biopsy for isolation and expansion of chondrocytes, which were seeded onto collagen membrane and implanted in the lesion site; the characterization of cultured cells and implant was performed using immunofluorescence for type II collagen (COL2) for cell viability and electron microscopy of the implant. Clinical safety, KOOS and IKDC scores and magnetic resonance imaging were evaluated. We used repeated-measures ANOVA and post-hoc comparisons at α = 5%. RESULTS: COL2 was identified in the cellular cytoplasm, cell viability was higher than 95% and adequate distribution and cell adhesion were found in the membrane. The median follow-up was 10.9 months (7 to 19). We had two cases of arthrofibrosis, one of graft hypertrophy and one of superficial infection as complications, but none compromising clinical improvement. KOOS and IKDC ranged from 71.2 ± 11.44 and 50.72 ± 14.10, in preoperative period, to 85.0 ± 4.4 and 70.5 ± 8.0, at 6 months (p = 0.007 and 0.005). MRI showed regenerated tissue compatible with hyaline cartilage. CONCLUSION: ACI in collagen membrane was feasible and safe in a short-term follow-up, presenting regenerated formation visualized by magnetic resonance imaging and improved clinical function. Level of evidence IV, Case series.
Articular cartilage defects can impose limiting symptoms, loss of function and
predisposition for osteoarthritis. Furthermore, it is a challenging clinical
problem, as cartilage damage has limited biological capacity for regeneration.
Nowadays, there are several techniques for treating these injuries with
proven medium and long-term clinical results, including bone marrow stimulation
(subchondral perforations and microfracture), autologous osteochondral transfer,
fresh allogeneic osteochondral transplantation and autologous chondrocyte
implantation (ACI). (
), (
Each of these techniques has advantages and limitations, but ACI is
currently considered first-line surgical treatment for large defects with intact
subchondral bone. (
)- (ACI was introduced in 1994 by Brittberg et al. (
The procedure is performed in two surgical procedures: arthroscopic biopsy
of normal cartilage from a non-weightbearing area, in which chondrocytes are
isolated and expanded in a cell culture laboratory; implant of the cultured
chondrocytes onto defect site. ACI first-generation techniqueused a periosteum patch
harvested from the tibia and sutured to the surrounding of the defect, containing
the solution with suspended cells and delimiting the area for cartilage formation.
(
Second-generation technique used a collagen membrane to replace the
periosteum patch. (
Third-generation used previously chondrocytes-seeded membranes, and last
days of cell culture are performed directly on the membrane scaffold. (In Brazil, experiences with ACI and other cellular therapies for cartilage
regeneration are incipient. After the initial application of first-generation
technique, (
), (
there was a period in which other techniques were not available.The aim of this study was to establish an ACI clinical routine for knee cartilage
injuries and report the experience with a six-month minimum follow-up, focusing on
feasibility, patient safety and evaluation of adverse events and functional
outcome.
METHODS
From January 2017 to December 2018, eleven patients were consecutively recruited to
attend an outpatient clinic in a tertiary health service. Inclusion criteria were:
aged between 14 and 55 years; and symptomatic chondral knee lesions larger than 2
cm2, visualized on magnetic resonance imaging, classified as III or
IV grade by the International Cartilage Regeneration & Joint Preservation
Society (ICRS) score with previous conservative treatment failure. Non-inclusion
criteria were: patients with BMI > 30 kg/m2 and ligamentous
instability or limb malalignment greater than 5° which were not correctable during
surgery. Meniscal deficiency was not an exclusion criterion.All patients were informed about their voluntary participation in the research by the
application of the Informed Consent Form. The study was approved by the
Institutional Research Ethics Committee (protocol 1123) and registered in the
National Clinical Trials database.
Cartilage biopsy
In the first surgical stage, cartilage biopsy was performed on the superolateral
aspect of the intercondylar notch, outside the loading area. A specific
arthroscopic gouge was used to remove a 5 mm by 10 to 15 mm full-thickness
fragment (Figure 1). The fragment was
immediately placed in a 50 ml conical tube containing DMEM / F12 transport
culture medium (GIBCO) supplemented with 50 µM gentamicin (Hypofarma). The
samples were promptly transported to the cell culture laboratory, with
facilities approved by the Brazilian national sanitary authority (ANVISA) for
cell therapy clinical trials (Center for Cellular Technology II - CTC II), where
they were kept refrigerated at 4°C for a maximum of 48 hours.
Figure 1
Arthroscopic cartilage biopsy of lateral intercondylar area.
Fragment Chondrocyte.
Isolation and culture
Biopsy specimen was washed three times using phosphorus-buffered saline (PBS)
supplemented with 50 µM gentamicin and fragmented to obtain small cartilaginous
tissue explants. These were placed in 25 cm2 culture bottles, with 5
ml of DMEM/F12 mixture (GIBCO), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (GIBCO)
and 50 uM gentamicin. The bottles were kept in an incubator at 37°C, with
relative humidity close to 100% and atmosphere of 5% CO2. After 72 hours,
culture medium was changed, and non-adherent fragments were discarded. New
culture medium consisted of DMEM/F12 mixture supplemented with 5% fetal bovine
serum and 50 µM gentamicin until cells migrated from the explant and formed the
first colonies. When maximum confluence (70-90%) was reached, cell suspension
was performed. About 1×104 cells per cm2 were placed in
culture bottles in DMEM / F12 culture medium supplemented with 5% fetal bovine
serum and 50 µM gentamicin until chondrocyte implantation in collagen membrane.
Chondrocytes were removed from the culture bottles by TRYPLE enzyme (5 min at
37°C) and transferred to 15 ml conical tubes with culture medium supplemented
with fetal bovine serum. Then, they were centrifuged at 800 rpm for 5 minutes.
Supernatant was discarded and chondrocytes were resuspended in 5 ml DMEM / F12
culture medium supplemented with 50 µM gentamicin and distributed evenly over
the surface of the double-layer type I/III (Chondro-gide® - Geistlich
Pharma).
Cultures were kept for 3 to 4 days in an incubator at 37°C, with
relative humidity close to 100% and atmosphere of 5% CO2 until the second
surgical procedure. (
), (All samples were subjected to quality control. For microbiological control,
approximately 2 ml of culture medium was extracted from the chondrocyte culture
flasks and added to the microbiological growth flask (BD Bactec Peds
PlusTM), to detect the growth of aerobic and anaerobic
microorganisms in culture medium samples. Fungal culture tests were also
performed on culture medium. Immunofluorescence evaluation with human monoclonal
antibody anti-collagen was used in cell cultures to assess the presence of type
II collagen as a biological marker of chondrocytes. The final implantation of
chondrocyte-seeded collagen membrane was subjected to scanning electron
microscopy to assess the presence of adhered cells. Cell viability was assessed
by DNA-intercalanting assays using hoechst 33342 (0.1 µg/ml) and iodide
propidium (50 µg/ml).
Second surgical stage
Through a parapatellar knee arthrotomy, the chondral lesion was identified and
debrided to remove all injured tissue, calcified cartilage layer and any
intralesional osteophytes. The objective was to obtain perpendicular edges of
healthy cartilage at the edge of the lesion. Then chondrocyte-seeded collagen
membrane was implanted with the porous part facing the bed and fixed with
absorbable points on the adjacent cartilage and fibrin glue at the lesion bottom
and edges. (
Additional clinically indicated procedures were performed, as shown in
Table 1. Intraoperative clinical
images are exemplified in Figures 2 to
4.
All patients received initial rehabilitation with assisted gait training with
crutches and continuous passive motion (CPM) device at the hospital, for at
least three days. For tibiofemoral lesions, immediate partial weightbearing was
allowed, progressing to total weightbearing at six weeks. Range of motion (ROM)
progression was: 0-30° in the hospital, 0-90° up to three weeks, 0-120° at six
weeks, and full ROM after that. For patellofemoral lesions, immediate partial
weightbearing with extension immobilizer and crutches was used, progressing to
full weightbearing at three weeks and immobilizer removal at six weeks. ROM
progression was: 0-20° at admission, 0-60° at three weeks and 0-120° up to six
weeks. Running started between 9 and 12 months, and normal sports activities
after 12 to 18 months.KOOS (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) and IKDC (International Knee
Documentation Committee Score) functional outcomes questionnaires were used.
(
T2-mapping magnetic resonance images were performed after six months for
all patients.Preoperative and postoperative patient’s functional scores were compared.
Repeated-measures ANOVA and Bonferroni method for multiple comparisons were
performed using the SPSS 22 statistical package (IBM, New York) to verify
statistically significant differences. Results were expressed as mean ± standard
deviation for normal distribution variables, considering a statistically
significant P value < 0.05.
RESULTS
Twelve knees of eleven patients aged 32.1 ± 10.9 years underwent treatment. Average
size of lesions was 5.3 ± 2.6 cm2. Location and associated lesions
treated are summarized in Table 1. Patient’s
median follow-up was 10.9 months (7 to 19). Two patients followed up for less than
two months by our group were not included in this series.We were successful in isolating and culturing all biopsy specimens performed. Average
cell culture period was 35 days. There was no microbiological contamination in any
of the samples. Immunofluorescence images of cultured chondrocytes showed the
presence of type II collagen distributed throughout the cell cytoplasm,
demonstrating chondrogenic profile (Figure 5).
Membrane scanning electron microscopy at the time of implantation showed the
presence of chondrocytes uniformly adhered to the membrane matrix through thin
cytoplasmic extensions (Figure 6). There was
good cell distribution in the membrane, and cell viability tests showed at least 95%
of viable cells (Figure 7).
Figure 5
Immunofluorescence showing type II collagen in the cytoplasm of
cultured chondrocytes.
Figure 6
Scanning electron microscopy image showing chondrocytes adhered to
the membrane collagen fibers
Figure 7
(A) DNA-intercalanting assay showing cell viability greater than 95%.
(B, C) Immunofluorescence with human anti-collagen II monoclonal
antibody in the final implant, showing presence and cellular
distribution in membranes.
Functional results are summarized in Table 2
and Figure 8. KOOS and IKDC scales were 71.2 ±
11.44 and 50.72 ± 14.10 preoperatively; at three months 77.7 ± 16.2 and 62.3 ± 19.2;
and six months 85.0 ± 4.4 and 70.5 ± 8.0. KOSS (p = 0.031) and IKDC (p = 0.009)
scores were significantly differentbetween preoperative and 6-month scores (p =
0.007 for KOOS and p = 0.005 for IKDC).
Table 2
Preoperative clinical scores at three and six months of
follow-up.
Preoperative
three months
six months
p*
p (preop vs 6 months) †
KOOS
71.2 ± 11.44
77.7 ± 16.2
85.0 ± 4.4
p = 0.031 ‡
p = 0.007 ‡
IKDC
50.72 ± 14.10
62.3 ± 19.2
70.5 ± 8.0
p = 0.009 ‡
p = 0.005 ‡
KOOS: Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; IKDC:
International Knee Documentation Committee Score. *Repeated-measures
ANOVA with Greenhouse-Geisser correction; † Bonferroni correction
t-test; ‡ statistically significant.
Figure 8
Box charts for the evolution of preoperative KOOS and IKDC scores at
six weeks, three months and six months.
KOOS: Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; IKDC:
International Knee Documentation Committee Score. *Repeated-measures
ANOVA with Greenhouse-Geisser correction; † Bonferroni correction
t-test; ‡ statistically significant.Magnetic resonance imaging at six-month follow-up showed regenerated tissue at lesion
site, good filling and signs of compatibility with hyaline cartilage (Figures 9 and 10).
Figure 9
Images demonstrating lateral femoral condyle lesions of two patients.
Images A and C are preoperative, showing chondral lesion, bone edema and
intra-lesional osteophytes; images B and D show the evolution at 6
months, good filling regeneration and signs of compatibility with
hyaline cartilage.
Figure 10
Preoperative magnetic resonance images (A), six months (B) and one
year (C) patient follow-up. 1. Increased lesion filling and
regeneration, similar to adjacent cartilage on the one-year
image.
There were four cases of complication. Two patients presented stiffness and
difficulty in ROM progression, with flexion less than 120 degrees at the tenth week.
After arthroscopic release and joint manipulation, full ROM was achieved. One
patient presented dehiscence and superficial infection in a pelvic surgical wound
for iliac graft removal, used for a high tibial osteotomy. He was treated with wound
debridement and antibiotic therapy until complete resolution. There was only one
complication due to the chondrocyte implantation itself: a graft hypertrophy
observed through magnetic resonance imaging but asymptomatic.
DISCUSSION
This study reported the first cases of third-generation ACI using collagen membrane
in Brazil.Isolation and cell cultivation of samples from all patients were successful on
chondrocyte growth and positive expression of collagen type II. The quality control
of the implants demonstrated good distribution, viable cells adhering to the
extracellular matrix of the collagen membrane and no microbiological
contamination.The primary outcome assessed in this short-term follow-up was safety. All surgeries
were performed successfully. Although there were four cases of treatment
complications, all were successfully treated, without functional outcome impairment.
Three cases were due to complex reconstructive knee surgery: post-operative
stiffness and wound complication. Only one was related to the implantation itself,
with graft hypertrophy observed through magnetic resonance imaging, but not
presenting symptoms. This complication has been reported in ACI international
literature as occurring in up to 27% of cases,15 and unrelated to
clinical outcomes or cartilage quality. (
), (The functional result obtained was adequate until the sixth month, with KOOS and IKDC
scores improvement in relation to the preoperative, consistent with previous
literature. Gommol et al. (
reported an increase in IKDC from 45.6 to 68, and KOOS from 45.86 to 70.14
in 2.46 years. Saris et al. (
reported an increase in IKDC 32.9 to 65.7, and KOOS from 32.5 to 74.1 in 24
months.As in other literature series, we expect function to improve further with longer
follow-ups, as returning to sports activities takes long after ACI application,
fully allowed after 12 to 18 months. (
), (Our study has limitations. This is a case series with no control group and short-term
follow-up. To evaluate the effectiveness of cartilage treatments, a minimum two-year
follow-up is desirable. However, the work was fully adequate to its main objective:
to report the development of a clinical routine for ACI with feasibility and safety
evaluation as a secondary outcome for the initial efficacy. At this follow-up, it
was possible to observe the regeneration in imaging exams, initial clinical
improvement in all patients and no serious complications.Patients recruited for this study represent the reality of cartilage treatment
defects in Brazil: large chondral lesions requiring additional procedures to treat
associated lesions. Using patients with isolated chondral lesion would result in
less varied outcomes. However, for the evaluation of safety and effectiveness, we
preferred to include the patient profile in which the technique is most likely to be
applied in our country, including associated injuries and previous surgeries. We
expect ACI to be frequently used as a combined procedure, and even as a salvage one,
after several previous surgeries. Therefore, this choice increases the external
validity of our study. (ACI is considered a first-line method in the international literature for the
treatment of large unipolar chondral knee injuries in active patients. (
), (
With third-generation technique, chondrocyte adhesion in scaffold occurred
in vitro, needless of cell manipulation in the operating room. (
), (Cell therapy as a treatment for cartilage injury has generated widespread clinical
and research interest worldwide. (
ACI was the first cell therapy for cartilage defects developed and routinely
used worldwide and is a first-line therapy for large chondral lesions. Gaining
national experience allows us to glimpse the possibility of having this technique
available for routine clinical use in near future. It is also the first necessary
step towards the future of cell and orthobiologic therapy in Brazil.
CONCLUSION
ACI in collagen membrane was feasible and safe in short-term follow-up for the
treatment of cartilage defects larger than 2 cm2, presenting regenerated
formation, visualized through magnetic resonance imaging, and improvement of
clinical function.
Authors: Thomas R Niethammer; Ansgar Loitzsch; Annie Horng; Andrea Baur-Melnyk; Martin Bendiks; Mehmet F Gülecyüz; Peter E Müller; Matthias F Pietschmann Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Cathal J Moran; Cecilia Pascual-Garrido; Susan Chubinskaya; Hollis G Potter; Russell F Warren; Brian J Cole; Scott A Rodeo Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2014-02-19 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Caroline Hoemann; Rita Kandel; Sally Roberts; Daniel B F Saris; Laura Creemers; Pierre Mainil-Varlet; Stephane Méthot; Anthony P Hollander; Michael D Buschmann Journal: Cartilage Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Riccardo Gomes Gobbi; Marco Kawamura Demange; Ronald Bispo Barreto; José Ricardo Pécora; Múrcia Uchõa de Rezende; Tarcisio E P Barros Filho; Christiane Bertachini Lombello Journal: Rev Bras Ortop Date: 2015-11-17
Authors: Alessandro Rozim Zorzi; Eliane Antonioli; Camila Cohen Kaleka; Moisés Cohen; Juliana Aparecida Preto de Godoy; Andrea Tiemi Kondo; José Mauro Kutner; Mario Lenza; Mario Ferretti Journal: Einstein (Sao Paulo) Date: 2022-05-06