| Literature DB >> 32532128 |
Dongwoo Lee1, Jihye Kim1, Eunjoo Song1, Ji-Young Jeong2, Eun-Chae Jeon3, Pilhan Kim1,4, Wonhee Lee1,5,6.
Abstract
3D imaging of a biological sample provides information about cellular and subcellular structures that are important in cell biology and related diseases. However, most 3D imaging systems, such as confocal and tomographic microscopy systems, are complex and expensive. Here, we developed a quasi-3D imaging tool that is compatible with most conventional microscopes by integrating micromirrors and microchannel structures on coverslips to provide bidirectional imaging. Microfabricated micromirrors had a precisely 45° reflection angle and optically clean reflective surfaces with high reflectance over 95%. The micromirrors were embedded on coverslips that could be assembled as a microchannel structure. We demonstrated that this simple disposable device allows a conventional microscope to perform bidirectional imaging with simple control of a focal plane. Images of microbeads and cells under bright-field and fluorescent microscopy show that the device can provide a quick analysis of 3D information, such as 3D positions and subcellular structures.Entities:
Keywords: 3D imaging; Optical MEMS; microfabrication; micromirror
Year: 2020 PMID: 32532128 PMCID: PMC7345240 DOI: 10.3390/mi11060582
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Figure 1Schematics for bidirectional imaging with a micromirror-embedded coverslip assembly. A microfabricated capillary channel and micromirrors are integrated on coverslips to provide top-view and side-view images of a sample at the same time with a conventional microscope system.
Figure 2A fabrication process for a micromirror. (a) Fabrication steps for trapezoidal micromirror. (b) Brass mater mold with a trapezoidal cross-section. (c) Cross-section view of PDMS channel. (d) Optical microscopic image of micromirrors with grains of salt. (e) SEM images of a micromirror.
Figure 3A fabrication process for micromirror-embedded coverslip assembly. (a) Fabrication steps for coverslip assembly. (b) SU-8 mold for parallel column structures (c) Coverslips with the embedded micromirrors (d) Final assembled coverslip device.
Figure 4Evaluation of bidirectional imaging with fluorescent beads. (a) Fluorescent microscopy images of four beads from top-view and side-view. (b) Bright-field images of bead 1. (c) Fluorescent intensity contours of bead 1 and (d) its intensity profile through the center lines in horizontal and vertical directions.
Comparison of the direct and reflected images of fluorescent beads.
| Intensity Ratio | Roundness | Aspect Ratio | Distance from the Mirror (μm) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horizontal | Vertical | Top | Side | Top | Side | ||
| B1 | 0.97 | 0.963 | 0.998 | 0.971 | 1.002 | 1.03 | 43.4 |
| B2 | 0.978 | 0.978 | 0.998 | 0.988 | 1.002 | 1.012 | 17.1 |
| B3 | 0.957 | 0.957 | 0.994 | 0.951 | 1.006 | 1.052 | 97.5 |
| B4 | 0.972 | 0.979 | 0.994 | 0.981 | 1.006 | 1.019 | 20.7 |
Figure 5Quasi-3D imaging of live cells with a micromirror-embedded coverslip. (a) Schematic of bidirectional imaging. (b) Corresponding bright-field microscopy images of an H460 cell (with arrows, obtained with 20× objective lens). The cell is located at different focal planes in the top-view and the side-view. (c) Image of multiple H460-GFP cells from top-view and two side-views with focusing at different depths. (d) 3D positions of the cells from c. (e) Bright-field images from the top-view and side-view of red blood cells (obtained with 50× objective lens).
Figure 6Fluorescent images of subcellular structure from top-view and side-view. Top-view and side-view images (obtained with 40× objective lens) of four H460 cells with the fluorescent-labeled cell membrane (red) and nucleus (green).