| Literature DB >> 32531917 |
Maria Grazia Melilli1, Vita Di Stefano2, Fabiola Sciacca3, Antonella Pagliaro1, Rosaria Bognanni1, Salvatore Scandurra1, Nino Virzì3, Carla Gentile2, Massimo Palumbo3.
Abstract
The addition of functional ingredients to breads could have effects on preventing cardiovascular diseases, cancers and inflammation. The incorporation of 0-5-10-15% of three populations of dried purslane flour on the rheological, sensorial and nutritional quality of fortified durum wheat breads were evaluated. The increase in dried purslane (up to 15%) caused an increase in the resistance to the mixture and a consequent reduction in its extensibility. The "panel test" gave a largely positive evaluation in 10% of enrichment. The fatty acids in breads resulted higher with the 5% substitution. Contrary to what has been imagined, the increase in percentage of substitution to 10 and 15% did not lead to an increase in linoleic (omega-3) and α-linolenic (omega-6) acid and probably the cause is in the cooking. The total phenols content and the antioxidant potential, evaluated by ferric reducing antioxidant potential (FRAP) and 2,2'-azinobis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) assays of the enriched breads increased with the percentage of the dry purslane substitution. The enrichment of the durum wheat flour with 5% purslane resulted in a good compromise to obtain good rheological characteristics of loaves and breads with decreased omega-6/omega-3 ratio and good antioxidant properties.Entities:
Keywords: Portulaca oleracea L.; antioxidants; durum wheat bread; essential fatty acids; omega-6/omega-3 ratio
Year: 2020 PMID: 32531917 PMCID: PMC7353616 DOI: 10.3390/foods9060764
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Bread samples.
| Origin | Code | Percentage of Substitution | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5% | 10% | 15% | ||
| Cassibile | Cas | Cas5 | Cas10 | Cas15 |
| Caltagirone | Cal | Cal5 | Cal10 | Cal15 |
| S. Venerina | SVen | SVen5 | SVen10 | SVen15 |
Alveographic and farinographic indices of the doughs enriched with purslane averaged for concentrations and populations. Different letters indicate differences at p < 0.05 (according to the Duncan test).
| Populations | Alveograph Analysis | Farinograph Analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | P/L | Water Absorption % | Development Time | Stability (min) | |
| Average of concentrations | |||||
| Cas | 86 a | 7.79 a | 64.92 c | 3.47 a | 9.35 a |
| Cal | 86 a | 7.91 a | 65.50 a | 3.45 a | 9.20 a |
| SVen | 88 a | 8.50 a | 65.05 ab | 5.45 a | 8.97 a |
| Means | 86.78 | 8.07 | 65.16 | 4.13 | 9.18 |
| Average of populations | |||||
| 0 | 135 a | 3.58 b | 62.90 d | 2.00 b | 4.20 d |
| 5 | 67 b | 10.15 a | 64.40 c | 2.57 b | 6.13 c |
| 10 | 58 b | 10.48 a | 65.70 b | 4.43 b | 9.47 b |
| 15 | - | - | 67.63 a | 7.50 a | 16.90 a |
| Means | 86.78 | 8.07 | 65.16 | 4.13 | 9.18 |
L*, a*, b* in the breads enriched with purslane on the average of concentrations and populations. Different letters indicate differences at p < 0.05.
| Populations | Crust L* | Crust a* | Crust b* | Crumb L* | Crumb a* | Crumb b* | Height cm | Volume cm3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average of concentrations | ||||||||
| Cal | 42.01 a | 9.96 a | 19.59 a | 49.00 a | 1.47 b | 16.34 a | 5.53 a | 265 a |
| Cas | 41.18 a | 9.97 a | 18.69 a | 47.57 b | 2.10 a | 15.83 a | 5.59 a | 260 a |
| SVen | 40.88 a | 10.38 a | 19.55 a | 47.04 b | 2.04 a | 16.19 a | 5.71 a | 263 a |
| Means | 41.35 | 10.10 | 19.28 | 47.87 | 1.87 | 16.12 | 5.61 | 263 |
| Average of populations | ||||||||
| 0 | 46.82 a | 16.69 a | 28.09 a | 69.26 a | −0.28 d | 22.58 a | 5.67 b | 336 a |
| 5 | 39.74 c | 9.98 b | 19.02 b | 44.80 b | 2.04 c | 15.35 b | 5.98 a | 259 b |
| 10 | 37.06 d | 8.21 c | 14.55 d | 40.30 c | 2.71 b | 14.03 c | 5.48 b | 240 bc |
| 15 | 41.79 b | 5.53 d | 14.88 c | 37.11 d | 3.01 a | 12.52 d | 5.32 b | 217 c |
| Means | 41.35 | 10.10 | 19.14 | 47.87 | 1.87 | 16.12 | 5.61 | 263 |
Sensory attributes of the crust and crumb of the fortified breads with purslane and their overall judgment. The threshold of acceptability for the bread’s overall judgment is 6.
| Sensory Attributes | Crust | Means | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cas | Cal | SVen | ||||||||||||||
| CTRL | 5 | 10 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 15 | Cas | Cal | SVen | 5% | 10% | 15% | |
| Thickness a | 3.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 4.3 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.3 |
| Elasticity a | 5.5 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 8.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.5 | 6.7 | 4.0 | 5.2 | 6.0 | 5.3 |
| Hardness a | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 5.3 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 5.3 | 5.1 | 5.8 | 5.3 | 4.7 |
| Friability a | 4.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 4.7 |
| Apparent softness a | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 3.7 | 3.3 | 3.7 | 2.7 | 3.7 |
| Crumb | ||||||||||||||||
| Elasticity a | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 4.7 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 5.3 | 4.7 |
| Apparent softness a | 3.3 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Friability a | 5.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 5.3 | 4.7 | 4.0 | 5.7 | 5.3 |
| Cohesiveness a | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.0 |
| Humidity a | 3.8 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.7 |
| Average size of the alveoli a | 3.5 | 4.5 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.5 | 3.1 | 2.8 | 3.8 | 2.0 | 3.3 |
| Homogeneity of the alveoli a | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| Cohesiveness to the crust a | 7.5 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.3 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Bread overall judgment b | 8.0 | 8.0 | 5.3 | 4.0 | 7.3 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 8.0 | 6.7 | 4.0 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 6.2 | 7.8 | 6.0 | 4.0 |
a 1—good feeling and 10—bad feeling; b 1—extremely unpleasant, 10—extremely pleasant. CTRL—bread without purslane.
Fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) content (mg 100 g−1) in the fortified breads. Different letters indicate statistical differences at p < 0.05 among percentage of substitution into the same purslane population.
| Fortified Bread Sample | Dry Purslane * | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTRL | Cal5 | Cal10 | Cal15 | Cas5 | Cas10 | Cas15 | SVen5 | SVen10 | SVen15 | Cal | Cas | SVen | |
| Palmitic a. | 42.0 | 41.0 a | 35.0 b | 32.4 c | 65.1 a | 47.4 b | 29.3 c | 48.6 a | 38.5 b | 35.1 b | 39.0 | 42.0 | 35.0 |
| Oleic a. | 38.5 | 35.5 a | 30.6 b | 26.2 c | 56.9 a | 40.0 b | 24.1 c | 41.4 a | 32.9 b | 28.2 b | 20.0 | 21.0 | 10.0 |
| LA | 132.3 | 119.3 a | 104.3 b | 90.3 c | 203.0 a | 141.1 b | 83.6 c | 143.8 a | 115.1 b | 93.7 c | 88.0 | 78.0 | 51.0 |
| ALA | 8.4 | 13.2 a | 9.3b | 10.5 b | 16.6 a | 13.0 a | 7.7 b | 13.1 a | 9.5 b | 9.9 b | 84.0 | 89.0 | 67.0 |
| ∑fatty acids | 221.2 | 209.0 a | 179.2 b | 159.5 c | 341.5 a | 241.5 b | 144.6 c | 246.8 a | 196.0 b | 166.9 c | 172 | 167 | 118 |
| PUFA | 140.7 | 132.5 a | 113.6 ab | 100 b | 219.6 a | 154.1 b | 91.3 c | 156.9 a | 124.6 b | 103.6 c | 231 | 230 | 163 |
| PUFA/SFA | 3.3 | 3.2 a | 3.2 a | 3.1 a | 3.4 a | 3.2 a | 3.1 a | 3.2 a | 3.2 a | 2.9 b | 4.41 | 3.98 | 3.37 |
| ω-6/ω-3 ratio | 15.7 | 9.0 b | 11.2 a | 8.6 b | 12.2 a | 10.9 b | 10.9 b | 10.9 b | 12.1 a | 9.4 b | 1.05 | 0.88 | 0.76 |
* [12]; (LA: linoleic acid; ALA: α-linolenic acid; PUFA: polyunsaturated fatty acid; SFA: saturated fatty acid).
Figure 1The total phenol content (TPC) of the fortified breads, obtained with durum wheat flour and purslane at three different concentrations. (ns) indicates not statistically different. (***) significant at 0.001 probability level. LSD (Least Significant Difference) (p < 0.05) Cas = 15.3; LSD (p < 0.05) Cal = 12.8; LSD (p < 0.05) SVen = 14.2.
Figure 2Trolox equivalent (TE) antioxidant activity (FRAP assay and ABTS assay) of the fortified breads obtained with durum wheat flour and the three populations of purslane at 5 and 10% substitution. Different letters among bars indicate significant differences at 0.05 probability level. FRAP: ferric reducing antioxidant power); ABTS 2,2′-azinobis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid).