Literature DB >> 32529340

Use of a Decision Support Tool on Prognosis of Work Ability in Work Disability Assessments: An Experimental Study Among Insurance Physicians.

I Louwerse1,2,3, M A Huysmans4,5, H J van Rijssen4,6,5, C L I Gielen4,6,5, A J van der Beek4,5, J R Anema4,5.   

Abstract

Purpose Assessment of prognosis of work disability is a challenging task for occupational health professionals. An evidence-based decision support tool, based on a prediction model, could aid professionals in the decision-making process. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of such a tool on Dutch insurance physicians' (IPs) prognosis of work ability and their prognostic confidence, and assess IPs' attitudes towards use of the tool. Methods We conducted an experimental study including six case vignettes among 29 IPs. For each vignette, IPs first specified their own prognosis of future work ability and prognostic confidence. Next, IPs were informed about the outcome of the prediction model and asked whether this changed their initial prognosis and prognostic confidence. Finally, respondents reported their attitude towards use of the tool in real practice. Results The concordance between IPs' prognosis and the outcome of the prediction model was low: IPs' prognosis was more positive in 72 (41%) and more negative in 20 (11%) cases. Using the decision support tool, IPs changed their prognosis in only 13% of the cases. IPs prognostic confidence decreased when prognosis was discordant, and remained unchanged when it was concordant. Concerning attitudes towards use, the wish to know more about the tool was considered as the main barrier. Conclusion The efficacy of the tool on IPs' prognosis of work ability and their prognostic confidence was low. Although the perceived barriers were overall limited, only a minority of the IPs indicated that they would be willing to use the tool in practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barriers and facilitators; Evidence-based decision support tool; Occupational health professionals; Prognosis of work ability; Prognostic confidence

Year:  2021        PMID: 32529340      PMCID: PMC7954760          DOI: 10.1007/s10926-020-09907-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  40 in total

1.  Predicting the duration of sickness absence for patients with common mental disorders in occupational health care.

Authors:  Karen Nieuwenhuijsen; Jos H A M Verbeek; Angela G E M de Boer; Roland W B Blonk; Frank J H van Dijk
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.024

Review 2.  Personal paper. Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice.

Authors:  R Grol
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-08-16

3.  The effect of ill health and socioeconomic status on labor force exit and re-employment: a prospective study with ten years follow-up in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Merel Schuring; Suzan J W Robroek; Ferdy W J Otten; Coos H Arts; Alex Burdorf
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 5.024

4.  Use of a personal digital assistant for managing antibiotic prescribing for outpatient respiratory tract infections in rural communities.

Authors:  Michael A Rubin; Kim Bateman; Sharon Donnelly; Gregory J Stoddard; Kurt Stevenson; Reed M Gardner; Matthew H Samore
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Measuring clients' perception of functional limitations using the Perceived Functioning & Health questionnaire.

Authors:  J M H Schellekens; F I Abma; H P G Mulders; S Brouwer
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2010-12

6.  Developing a computer delivered, theory based intervention for guideline implementation in general practice.

Authors:  Lisa McDermott; Lucy Yardley; Paul Little; Mark Ashworth; Martin Gulliford
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  A search strategy to identify studies on the prognosis of work disability: a diagnostic test framework.

Authors:  Rob Kok; Jos A H M Verbeek; Babs Faber; Frank J H van Dijk; Jan L Hoving
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Assessment of prognosis by physicians involved in work disability evaluation: A qualitative study.

Authors:  René J Kox; Jan L Hoving; Jos H Verbeek; Maria J E Schouten; Carel T J Hulshof; Haije Wind; Monique H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Why don't physicians adhere to guideline recommendations in practice? An analysis of barriers among Dutch general practitioners.

Authors:  Marjolein Lugtenberg; Judith M Zegers-van Schaick; Gert P Westert; Jako S Burgers
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Changes in work situation and work ability in young female and male workers. A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Maria Boström; Judith K Sluiter; Mats Hagberg
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  1 in total

1.  The perceived importance of prognostic aspects considered by physicians during work disability evaluation: a survey.

Authors:  Sylvia P Snoeck-Krygsman; Frederieke G Schaafsma; Birgit H P M Donker-Cools; Carel T J Hulshof; Lyanne P Jansen; René J Kox; Jan L Hoving
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 2.796

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.