OBJECTIVE: To assess the acceptability and usage of a standalone personal digital assistant (PDA)-based clinical decision-support system (CDSS) for the diagnosis and management of acute respiratory tract infections (RTIs) in the outpatient setting. DESIGN: Observational study performed as part of a larger randomized trial in six rural communities in Utah and Idaho from January 2002 to March 2004. Ninety-nine primary care providers received a PDA-based CDSS for use at the point-of-care, and were asked to use the tool with at least 200 patients with suspected RTIs. MEASUREMENTS: Clinical data were collected electronically from the devices at periodic intervals. Providers also completed an exit questionnaire at the end of the study period. RESULTS: Providers logged 14,393 cases using the CDSS, the majority of which (n=7624; 53%) were from family practitioners. Overall adherence with CDSS recommendations for the five most common diagnoses (pharyngitis, otitis media, sinusitis, bronchitis, and upper respiratory tract infection) was 82%. When antibiotics were prescribed (53% of cases), adherence with the CDSS-recommended antibiotic was high (76%). By logistic regression analysis, the odds of adherence with CDSS recommendations increased significantly with each ten cases completed (P=0.001). Questionnaire respondents believed the CDSS was easy to use, and most (44/65; 68%) did not believe it increased their encounter time with patients, regardless of prior experience with PDAs. CONCLUSION: A standalone PDA-based CDSS for acute RTIs used at the point-of-care can encourage better outpatient antimicrobial prescribing practices and easily gather a rich set of clinical data.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the acceptability and usage of a standalone personal digital assistant (PDA)-based clinical decision-support system (CDSS) for the diagnosis and management of acute respiratory tract infections (RTIs) in the outpatient setting. DESIGN: Observational study performed as part of a larger randomized trial in six rural communities in Utah and Idaho from January 2002 to March 2004. Ninety-nine primary care providers received a PDA-based CDSS for use at the point-of-care, and were asked to use the tool with at least 200 patients with suspected RTIs. MEASUREMENTS: Clinical data were collected electronically from the devices at periodic intervals. Providers also completed an exit questionnaire at the end of the study period. RESULTS: Providers logged 14,393 cases using the CDSS, the majority of which (n=7624; 53%) were from family practitioners. Overall adherence with CDSS recommendations for the five most common diagnoses (pharyngitis, otitis media, sinusitis, bronchitis, and upper respiratory tract infection) was 82%. When antibiotics were prescribed (53% of cases), adherence with the CDSS-recommended antibiotic was high (76%). By logistic regression analysis, the odds of adherence with CDSS recommendations increased significantly with each ten cases completed (P=0.001). Questionnaire respondents believed the CDSS was easy to use, and most (44/65; 68%) did not believe it increased their encounter time with patients, regardless of prior experience with PDAs. CONCLUSION: A standalone PDA-based CDSS for acute RTIs used at the point-of-care can encourage better outpatient antimicrobial prescribing practices and easily gather a rich set of clinical data.
Authors: H P Selker; J R Beshansky; J L Griffith; T P Aufderheide; D S Ballin; S A Bernard; S G Crespo; J A Feldman; S S Fish; W B Gibler; D A Kiez; R A McNutt; A W Moulton; J P Ornato; P J Podrid; J H Pope; D N Salem; M R Sayre; R H Woolard Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1998-12-01 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: M J Fine; T E Auble; D M Yealy; B H Hanusa; L A Weissfeld; D E Singer; C M Coley; T J Marrie; W N Kapoor Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1997-01-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Robert L Ohsfeldt; Marcia M Ward; John E Schneider; Mirou Jaana; Thomas R Miller; Yang Lei; Douglas S Wakefield Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2004-10-18 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: D W Bates; L L Leape; D J Cullen; N Laird; L A Petersen; J M Teich; E Burdick; M Hickey; S Kleefield; B Shea; M Vander Vliet; D L Seger Journal: JAMA Date: 1998-10-21 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Annette Moxey; Jane Robertson; David Newby; Isla Hains; Margaret Williamson; Sallie-Anne Pearson Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2010 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Cara B Litvin; Steven M Ornstein; Andrea M Wessell; Lynne S Nemeth; Paul J Nietert Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-11-02 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jun Wern Yau; Sze Mun Thor; Danny Tsai; Tobias Speare; Chris Rissel Journal: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Date: 2021-07-13 Impact factor: 4.887