| Literature DB >> 32528949 |
Anna Slanzi1, Giulia Iannoto1, Barbara Rossi1, Elena Zenaro1, Gabriela Constantin1,2.
Abstract
Neurodegenerative diseases are progressive degenerative conditions characterized by the functional deterioration and ultimate loss of neurons. These incurable and debilitating diseases affect millions of people worldwide, and therefore represent a major global health challenge with severe implications for individuals and society. Recently, several neuroprotective drugs have failed in human clinical trials despite promising pre-clinical data, suggesting that conventional cell cultures and animal models cannot precisely replicate human pathophysiology. To bridge the gap between animal and human studies, three-dimensional cell culture models have been developed from human or animal cells, allowing the effects of new therapies to be predicted more accurately by closely replicating some aspects of the brain environment, mimicking neuronal and glial cell interactions, and incorporating the effects of blood flow. In this review, we discuss the relative merits of different cerebral models, from traditional cell cultures to the latest high-throughput three-dimensional systems. We discuss their advantages and disadvantages as well as their potential to investigate the complex mechanisms of human neurodegenerative diseases. We focus on in vitro models of the most frequent age-related neurodegenerative disorders, such as Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease and prion disease, and on multiple sclerosis, a chronic inflammatory neurodegenerative disease affecting young adults.Entities:
Keywords: in vitro models; induced pluripotent stem cells; neurodegenerative diseases; organoids; three-dimensional culture
Year: 2020 PMID: 32528949 PMCID: PMC7247860 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00328
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol ISSN: 2296-634X
Cell culture systems that can be used to study neurodegenerative diseases (iPSC, induced pluripotent stem cell).
| Neurodegenerative diseases | Immortalized cell lines | iPSC-derived cell lines | iPSCs (patient derived) | Organ-like model |
| Not available | ||||
| Not available | Not available | |||
| Not available | ||||
| Not available |
Advantages and disadvantages of the different cell lines used to study Parkinson’s disease (iPSC, induced pluripotent stem cell).
| Cell line | Type | Advantages | Disadvantages |
| Human neuroglioma cells | Easy to culture and transfect. | Lacks dopaminergic phenotype. | |
| Immortalized human embryonic kidney cells | Homogenous populations, suitable for large-scale experiments ( | High passage numbers can lead to genetic and epigenetic alterations. Non-neuronal cell type ( | |
| Human neuroblastoma cells | Differentiate into neuronal-like cells exhibiting cholinergic, dopaminergic, or noradrenergic phenotypes ( | Neuroblastoma origin may influence differentiation, viability, growth performance, metabolic properties and genomic stability. Multiple differentiation protocols lead to different outcomes ( | |
| Pheochromocytoma-derived cell line from the rat adrenal medulla | Synthesizes, releases and stores catecholamines. Easy to handle and homogeneous ( | Not human. Derived from a neural tumor, which may alter signaling pathways. | |
| Immortalized human embryonic mesencephalic cells | Already used in co-cultures with astrocytes ( | Low transfection efficiency. | |
| Prepared from embryonic rodent brain tissue | Similar to human neurons in terms of morphology and physiology. Similar proliferation rate to human neurons. Suitable for the generation of genetic models ( | Ethical problems. Mixed culture. Variations among different culture preparations and difficult to maintain. Dissection procedure can introduce experimental variability ( | |
| Derived from patients | Capacity for self-renewal. Potential to differentiate into any cell type. Allow the generation of autologous pluripotent cells from any individual for disease modeling ( | Challenging to identify disease-specific cell phenotypes that better represent pathogenesis. Do not mimic aging. Requirement of standardized protocols and quality controls to reduce technical variation. High costs ( | |
| Derived from patients | Provide a 3D environment of multiple cell types. Organized structure. Enhanced cellular maturity. Promising for screening compounds targeting the central nervous system. Possibility to study PD-related genes. | Highly variable. Need for improved vascularization and optimization of differentiation protocols. Time-consuming and expensive. Ethical problems ( |
FIGURE 1Schematic representation of microfluidic brain model. The model features neurons and glial cells embedded in a matrix. The architecture includes a flow of medium mimicking the BBB, enriched with soluble factors and peripheral immune cells, which are key players in neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration. The migration of peripheral immune cells through the BBB has been implicated in the pathogenesis of several neurodegenerative diseases. The role of infiltrating peripheral immune cells has been investigated in detail for MS, which involves the breakdown of the BBB and multifocal inflammation caused by the innate and adaptive immune systems. However, BBB impairment and the infiltration of peripheral immune cells also correlate with the pathogenesis of other neurodegenerative diseases, such as AD and PD. Adding a fluidic system to mimic the BBB is therefore necessary to investigate the pathological mechanisms of neurodegenerative diseases and eventually to study the transport of drugs across the BBB.