| Literature DB >> 32528050 |
Mohamed Mohamed Soliman1,2, Mohamed Abdo Nassan3, Adil Aldhahrani4, Fayez Althobaiti5, Wafaa Abdou Mohamed6.
Abstract
Hyperuricemia is an abnormal metabolic condition characterized by an increase in uric acid levels in the blood. It is the cause of gout, manifested by inflammatory arthritis, pain and disability. This study examined the possible ameliorative impacts of parsley (PAR) and celery (CEL) as hypouricemic agents at biochemical, molecular and cellular levels. PAR and CEL alone or in combination were orally administered to hyperuricemic (HU) mice and control mice for 10 consecutive days. Serum levels of uric acid and blood urea nitrogen (BUN), xanthine oxidase activity, antioxidants, inflammatory (IL-1β and TNF-α) and anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10) were measured. mRNA expression of urate transporters and uric acid excretion genes in renal tissues were examined using qRT-PCR (quantitative real time PCR). Normal histology and immunoreactivity of transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-β1) in kidneys was examined. Administration of PAR and CEL significantly reduced serum BUN and uric acids in HU mice, ameliorated changes in malondialdehyde, catalase, and reduced glutathione, glutathione peroxidase (GPX), IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-10 in hyperuricemic mice. Both effectively normalized the alterations in mURAT-1, mGLUT-9, mOAT-1 and mOAT-3 expression, as well as changes in TGF-β1 immunoreactivity. Interestingly, combined administration of PAR and CEL mitigated all examined measurements synergistically, and improved renal dysfunction in the hyperuricemic mice. The study concluded that PAR and CEL can potentially reduce damaging cellular, molecular and biochemical effects of hyperuricemia both individually and in combination.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32528050 PMCID: PMC7289838 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-66205-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
The primers used for quantitative real time PCR (qRT-PCR). The primers sequence have been designed using real-time PCR (TaqMan) Primer and Probes Design Tool.
| Gene | Product size (bp) | Accession number | Direction | Sequence (5′-3′) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mOAT-1 | 183 | NM_008766.3 | Sense | GACAGGGTCTCATCCCTAGC |
| Antisense | GTCCCTGACACACTGACTGA | |||
| mOAT-3 | 153 | NM_001164635.1 | Sense | TACAGTTGTCCGTGTCTGCT |
| Antisense | CTTCCTCCTTCTTGCCGTTG | |||
| mURAT-1 | 145 | NM_009203.3 | Sense | GATAGGTTTGGGCGCAGAAG |
| Antisense | TCATCATGACACCTGCCACT | |||
| mGlut-9 | 153 | NM_001102415.1 | Sense | TTCGGGTCCTTCCTTCCTCTA |
| Antisense | GGACACAGTCACAGACCAGA | |||
| mGda | 139 | NM_010266.2 | Sense | GGCTGGTGGCTACTCCTATT |
| Antisense | GCTTCCTCCAAGAGTGGCTA | |||
| mPNP | 140 | L11290.1 | Antisense | CGACTGGTGTTTGGATTGCT |
| Sense | ACCACCAAAGTTTCCACACC | |||
| mβ-actin | 143 | Nm_007393.5 | Sense | CCAGCCTTCCTTCTTGGGTA |
| Antisense | CAATGCCTGGGTACATGGTG |
Ameliorative effects of parsley and celery on serum kidney and liver biomarkers in oxonate induced hyperuricemia.
| Creatinine (mg/dl) | BUN (mg/dl) | Uric acid (U/l) | GPT (U/l) | GOT (U/l) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.67 ± 0.05 | 11.1 ± 1 | 4.5 ± 0.2 | 33.5 ± 1.3 | 30.1 ± 1.7 |
| HU | 1.6 ± 0.15* | 26.3 ± 1.3* | 15.7 ± 0.9* | 49.9 ± 2.1* | 52 ± 3.0* |
| HU + ALP | 0.7 ± 0.05# | 14.9 ± 0.8# | 8.01 ± 0.4# | 37.3 ± 0.9# | 36.9 ± 1.3# |
| Parsley | 0.55 ± 0.01 | 12.6 ± 1.6 | 5.8 ± 0.6 | 33.1 ± 0.5 | 34.9 ± 1.7 |
| Celery | 0.6 ± 0.02 | 12.9 ± 1.5 | 5.7 ± 0.3 | 33.4 ± 1.7 | 35.1 ± 1.1 |
| HU + Parsley | 0.6 ± 0.02# | 14.5 ± 1.13# | 7.8 ± 0.4# | 38.8 ± 1.2# | 37.2 ± 1.4# |
| HU + Celery | 0.6 ± 0.03# | 13.5 ± 1.8# | 6.9 ± 0.3# | 36.8 ± 1.2# | 36.4 ± 1.3# |
| HU + Par + CEL | 0.5 ± 0.07$ | 10.4 ± 0.9$ | 5.3 ± 0.2$ | 29.3 ± 0.89$ | 27.1 ± 1.01$ |
Values are means ± standard error (SEM) for 7 different mice per each treatment. Values are statistically significant at *P < 0.05 vs control; #P < 0.05 vs hyperuricemic group and $P < 0.05 vs either hyperuricemic group or both HU + PAR or HU + CEL. ALP: Allopurinol; PAR: parsley; CEL celery; HU: hyperuricemia.
Ameliorative effects of parsley and celery on serum and liver xanthine oxidase activity in hyperuricemic mice.
| Serum XO (U/l) | Hepatic XO (U/g tissue protein) | |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 13.9 ± 1.1 | 17.3 ± 1.2 |
| HU | 55.7 ± 4* | 67.2 ± 6.8* |
| HU + ALP | 24.4 ± 2.5# | 27.1 ± 1.7# |
| Parsley | 14.9 ± 1.3 | 17.5 ± 1.9 |
| Celery | 14.4 ± 2.9 | 15.4 ± 1.1 |
| HU + Parsley | 23.1 ± 4.7# | 25.4 ± 2.4# |
| HU + Celery | 22.2 ± 4.8# | 29 ± 4.3# |
| HU + Par + CEL | 17.8 ± 3.2$ | 20.1 ± 1.9$ |
Values are means ± standard error (SEM) for 7 different mice per each treatment. Values are statistically significant at *P < 0.05 vs control; #P < 0.05 vs hyperuricemic group and $P < 0.05 vs either hyperuricemic group or both HU + PAR or HU + CEL. ALP: Allopurinol; PAR: parsley; CEL celery; HU: hyperuricemia; XO: xanthine oxidase.
Ameliorative effects of parsley and celery on serum levels of IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-10 in hyperuricemic mice.
| IL-1β (pg/ml) | TNF-α (pg/ml) | IL-10 (pg/ml) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 15.6 ± 1.1 | 21.5 ± 1.2 | 46.3 ± 2.1 |
| HU | 35.6 ± 1.8* | 59.9 ± 4.6* | 29.1 ± 1.8* |
| HU + ALP | 17.7 ± 1.6# | 32.1 ± 1.8# | 42.5 ± 1.67# |
| Parsley | 14.4 ± 2.4 | 28.2 ± 2 | 49.8 ± 1.88 |
| Celery | 13.8 ± 2.3 | 22.6 ± 1.59 | 50.1 ± 3.1 |
| HU + Parsley | 18.2 ± 1.7# | 36.4 ± 2.6# | 43.7 ± 1.5# |
| HU + Celery | 19.2 ± 2.36# | 31.1 ± 3.1# | 42.9 ± 1.69# |
| HU + Par + CEL | 13.3 ± 2.1$ | 26.4 ± 2.1$ | 45.8 ± 1.23$ |
Values are means ± standard error (SEM) for 7 different mice per each treatment. Values are statistically significant at *P < 0.05 vs control; #P < 0.05 vs hyperuricemic group and $P < 0.05 vs either hyperuricemic group or both HU + PAR or HU + CEL. ALP: Allopurinol; PAR: parsley; CEL celery; HU: hyperuricemia.
Ameliorative effects of parsley and celery on serum antioxidants levels in oxonate induced hyperuricemia.
| MDA (nmol/ml) | GSH (nmol/l) | GPX (U/l) | Catalase (U/l) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 13.2 ± 0.7 | 2.6 ± 0.1 | 161 ± 4.6 | 264 ± 22 |
| HU | 38.7 ± 1.01* | 1.2 ± 0.1* | 110 ± 3/5* | 167 ± 13* |
| HU + ALP | 16.5 ± 1# | 2 ± 0.2# | 147 ± 5.6# | 254 ± 8.9# |
| Parsley | 12.1 ± 1.3 | 3.1 ± 0.2 | 202 ± 29 | 309 ± 21.6 |
| Celery | 11.4 ± 0.5 | 3.1 ± 0.2 | 216 ± 31 | 287 ± 10.1 |
| HU + Parsley | 18.1 ± 1.5# | 2.89 ± 0.1# | 149 ± 6.1# | 235 ± 15.9# |
| HU + Celery | 19.3 ± 1.4# | 3.1 ± 0.1# | 156 ± 5.1# | 227 ± 8# |
| HU + Par + CEL | 12.5 ± 0.5$ | 3.4 ± 0.2$ | 184 ± 6.5$ | 257 ± 7.8$ |
Values are means ± standard error (SEM) for 7 different mice per each treatment. Values are statistically significant at *P < 0.05 vs control; #P < 0.05 vs hyperuricemic group and $P < 0.05 vs either hyperuricemic group or both HU + PAR or HU + CEL. ALP: Allopurinol MDA: Malondialdehyde; GSH: reduced glutathione; GPX: glutathione peroxidase; PAR: parsley; CEL celery; HU: hyperuricemia;
Figure 1Ameliorative Effects of parsley and celery on changes of mRNA expression of OAT-1 and OAT-3 in HU mice using quantitative real time PCR. Graphic presentation of renal mRNA of OAT-1 and OAT-3 in different groups of mice after normalization with beta actin. *p < 0.05 vs control group; #P < 0.05 vs HUR group and $P < 0.05 vs either HU + Parsley or HU + Celery groups.
Figure 2Ameliorative Effects of parsley and celery on mRNA expression of mURAT-1 and mGlut-9 in HU mice using real time PCR. Graphic presentation of renal mRNA of mURAT-1 and mGlut-9 in different groups of mice after normalization with beta actin. *p < 0.05 vs control group; #P < 0.05 vs HUR group and $P < 0.05 vs either HU + parsley or HU + celery groups.
Figure 3Ameliorative Effects of parsley and celery on mRNA expression of mPNP and mGda HU mice using real time PCR. Graphic presentation of liver mRNA of mPNP and mGda in different groups of mice after normalization with beta actin. *p < 0.05 vs control group; #P < 0.05 vs HUR group and $P < 0.05 vs either HU + parsley or HU + celery groups.
Figure 4(A) Kidney of control group showing normal glomerular (arrow) and tubular (*) structure. (B) Kidney of HU group showed occlusion of tubular lumina by dense cell infiltration (arrow) and a shrinkage of glomerular tufts with periglomrular and interstitial (*) round cells infiltration. (C) Kidney of HU group treated with allopurinol showed normal glomerular architecture (arrow) with normal tubular histology (*). (D) Kidney of parsley administered mice showed normal renal tissue with normal tubular (arrow) and glomerular picture (*). Kidney of celery administered group showed the normal histological picture of both glomerular (arrow) and tubular (*) sections (F) Kidney of HU group treated with parsley alone showed restoration of normal picture with normal glomerular (thick arrow) and tubular (*) structure and mild perivascular round cells infiltration (thin arrow). (G) Kidney of HU group treated with celery showed restoration of glomerular (arrow) and tubular (*) tissue histology. H. Kidney of HU group treated with celery and parsley showed normal histological picture of both glomerular (arrow) and tubular (*) tissue with absence of urate crystals. Scale bar = 50 μm.
Figure 5(A) Kidney of control group showed absence of expression of TGF-β1 in renal tissue. (B) Kidney of HU group showed increased expression of TGF-β1 in renal tubular tissue. (C) Kidney of HU group treated with allopurinol showed no marked expression of TGF-β in renal tissue. (D) Kidney of parsley administered mice showed absence of expression of TGF-β1 in renal tubular tissue. (E) Kidney of celery group showed absence of TGF-β1 expression in tubular tissue. (F) Kidney of HU group treated with parsley alone showed no observed reactivity for TGF-β1 in renal tissue. (G) Kidney of HU group treated with celery showed glomerular and tubular tissue with no TGF-β1 expression. H. Kidney of HU group treated with celery and parsley together showed restoration of normal picture without expression of TGF-β1 in renal tissue. Scale bar = 50 μm.
Immunohistochemical scoring and intensity of TGF-β in renal sections of different treated groups.
| Immunohistochemical scoring of TGF-β | CNT | HU | HU + ALP | PAR | CEL | HU + PAR | HU + CEL | HU + PAR + CEL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Staining intensity | − | +++ | − | − | − | − | − | − |
Score 1 = (No expression; no positive stained cells per examined three high-power fields (HPF), at 40× magnification.
Score 2 = (weak; 1–10 positive stained cells/HPF).
Score 3 = (moderate; 11–20 positive stained cells/HPF).
Score 4 = (strong; >20 positive stained cells/HPF).
Figure 6Schematic illustration for the ameliorative effects of parsley and celery on experimental hyperuricemia.