Literature DB >> 32524353

The prognostic significance of BMI1 expression in invasive breast cancer is dependent on its molecular subtypes.

Maryam Althobiti1,2, Abir A Muftah3, Mohammed A Aleskandarany1, Chitra Joseph1, Michael S Toss1, Andrew Green1, Emad Rakha4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: BMI1, which is a major component of the polycomb group complex 1, is an essential epigenetic repressor of multiple regulatory genes and has been identified as a cancer stem cell (CSC) marker in several cancers. However, its role in breast cancer (BC) remains to be defined. In this study, we have evaluated the prognostic significance of BMI1 among the different molecular subtypes and assessed its association with other breast CSC markers (BCSC). MATERIAL AND
METHOD: BMI1 copy number and mRNA was assessed in large and well-characterised cohorts of early-stage BC patients [METABRIC (n = 1980) and the Bc-GenExMiner (n = 9616) databases]. BMI1 protein expression was assessed using tissue microarray and immunohistochemistry in a cohort of 870 invasive BC patients with long-term outcome data and the expression of a panel of BCSC markers was monitored. RESULT: BMI1 expression, prognostic significance and its association with BCSC markers were differed between molecular classes. In the luminal oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+) BC, BMI1 showed significantly higher expression compared to ER- tumours. BMI1 showed positive correlation with favourable prognostic features and it was negatively associated with the expression of key BCSC markers (ALDH1A1, CD24, CD44, CD133, SOX10 and SOX9). High expression of BMI1 was associated with longer breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) independent of other prognostic variables. In the basal triple negative BC subtype, BMI1 expression showed positive association with CD133 and SOX10 and it was significantly associated with shorter BCSS.
CONCLUSION: High BMI1 expression is associated with clinicopathological variables and outcome in BC. However, this association is dependent on the molecular subtypes. Further functional assessment to detect its underlying mechanistic roles in BC subtypes is warranted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMI1; Breast cancer; Breast cancer stem markers; Oestrogen receptor positive; Outcome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32524353      PMCID: PMC7320923          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05719-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  40 in total

1.  Expression of Bmi-1 protein in tumor tissues is associated with favorable prognosis in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Young Jin Choi; Yoon La Choi; Eun Yoon Cho; Young Kee Shin; Ki Woong Sung; Yu Kyeong Hwang; Sang Jin Lee; Gu Kong; Jeong Eon Lee; Jee Soo Kim; Jung Han Kim; Jung-Hyun Yang; Seok Jin Nam
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  High-throughput protein expression analysis using tissue microarray technology of a large well-characterised series identifies biologically distinct classes of breast cancer confirming recent cDNA expression analyses.

Authors:  Dalia M Abd El-Rehim; Graham Ball; Sarah E Pinder; Emad Rakha; Claire Paish; John F R Robertson; Douglas Macmillan; Roger W Blamey; Ian O Ellis
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 3.  Histochemical approaches to steroid receptor analyses.

Authors:  K S McCarty; K S McCarty
Journal:  Semin Diagn Pathol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  bc-GenExMiner: an easy-to-use online platform for gene prognostic analyses in breast cancer.

Authors:  Pascal Jézéquel; Mario Campone; Wilfried Gouraud; Catherine Guérin-Charbonnel; Christophe Leux; Gabriel Ricolleau; Loïc Campion
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Prognostic stratification of oestrogen receptor-positive HER2-negative lymph node-negative class of breast cancer.

Authors:  Emad A Rakha; Devika Agarwal; Andrew R Green; Ibraheem Ashankyty; Ian O Ellis; Graham Ball; Mohammed A Alaskandarany
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  The somatic mutation profiles of 2,433 breast cancers refines their genomic and transcriptomic landscapes.

Authors:  Bernard Pereira; Suet-Feung Chin; Oscar M Rueda; Hans-Kristian Moen Vollan; Elena Provenzano; Helen A Bardwell; Michelle Pugh; Linda Jones; Roslin Russell; Stephen-John Sammut; Dana W Y Tsui; Bin Liu; Sarah-Jane Dawson; Jean Abraham; Helen Northen; John F Peden; Abhik Mukherjee; Gulisa Turashvili; Andrew R Green; Steve McKinney; Arusha Oloumi; Sohrab Shah; Nitzan Rosenfeld; Leigh Murphy; David R Bentley; Ian O Ellis; Arnie Purushotham; Sarah E Pinder; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Helena M Earl; Paul D Pharoah; Mark T Ross; Samuel Aparicio; Carlos Caldas
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Rho-GTPase activating-protein 18: a biomarker associated with good prognosis in invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Mohammed A Aleskandarany; Sultan Sonbul; Rachel Surridge; Abhik Mukherjee; Carlos Caldas; Maria Diez-Rodriguez; Ibraheem Ashankyty; Khalil I Albrahim; Ahmed M Elmouna; Ritu Aneja; Stewart G Martin; Ian O Ellis; Andrew R Green; Emad A Rakha
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Hsp90α Mediates BMI1 Expression in Breast Cancer Stem/Progenitor Cells through Facilitating Nuclear Translocation of c-Myc and EZH2.

Authors:  Yueh-Chun Lee; Wen-Wei Chang; Yi-Ying Chen; Yu-Hung Tsai; Ying-Hsiang Chou; Hsien-Chun Tseng; Hsin-Lin Chen; Chun-Chieh Wu; Ju Chang-Chien; Hsueh-Te Lee; Huei-Fan Yang; Bing-Yen Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Expression of aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1) is associated with basal-like markers and features of aggressive tumours in African breast cancer.

Authors:  H Nalwoga; J B Arnes; H Wabinga; L A Akslen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Updated UK Recommendations for HER2 assessment in breast cancer.

Authors:  Emad A Rakha; Sarah E Pinder; John M S Bartlett; Merdol Ibrahim; Jane Starczynski; Pauline J Carder; Elena Provenzano; Andrew Hanby; Sally Hales; Andrew H S Lee; Ian O Ellis
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Abnormal Endometrial Receptivity and Oxidative Stress in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Authors:  Hongying Shan; Renxin Luo; Xuanying Guo; Rong Li; Zhenhong Ye; Tianliu Peng; Fenting Liu; Zi Yang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 5.988

Review 2.  Critical Roles of Polycomb Repressive Complexes in Transcription and Cancer.

Authors:  Guan-Jun Dong; Jia-Le Xu; Yu-Ruo Qi; Zi-Qiao Yuan; Wen Zhao
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 3.  Mechanisms of Polycomb group protein function in cancer.

Authors:  Victoria Parreno; Anne-Marie Martinez; Giacomo Cavalli
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 46.297

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.