Maryam Althobiti1,2, Abir A Muftah3, Mohammed A Aleskandarany1, Chitra Joseph1, Michael S Toss1, Andrew Green1, Emad Rakha4,5. 1. Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, University of Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. 2. Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, College of Applied Medical Science, Shaqra University 33, Shaqra, 11961, Saudi Arabia. 3. Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of Benghazi, Benghazi, Libya. 4. Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, University of Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. emad.rakha@nottingham.ac.uk. 5. Department of Histopathology, Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust, City Hospital Campus, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK. emad.rakha@nottingham.ac.uk.
Abstract
PURPOSE: BMI1, which is a major component of the polycomb group complex 1, is an essential epigenetic repressor of multiple regulatory genes and has been identified as a cancer stem cell (CSC) marker in several cancers. However, its role in breast cancer (BC) remains to be defined. In this study, we have evaluated the prognostic significance of BMI1 among the different molecular subtypes and assessed its association with other breast CSC markers (BCSC). MATERIAL AND METHOD: BMI1 copy number and mRNA was assessed in large and well-characterised cohorts of early-stage BC patients [METABRIC (n = 1980) and the Bc-GenExMiner (n = 9616) databases]. BMI1 protein expression was assessed using tissue microarray and immunohistochemistry in a cohort of 870 invasive BC patients with long-term outcome data and the expression of a panel of BCSC markers was monitored. RESULT: BMI1 expression, prognostic significance and its association with BCSC markers were differed between molecular classes. In the luminal oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+) BC, BMI1 showed significantly higher expression compared to ER- tumours. BMI1 showed positive correlation with favourable prognostic features and it was negatively associated with the expression of key BCSC markers (ALDH1A1, CD24, CD44, CD133, SOX10 and SOX9). High expression of BMI1 was associated with longer breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) independent of other prognostic variables. In the basal triple negative BC subtype, BMI1 expression showed positive association with CD133 and SOX10 and it was significantly associated with shorter BCSS. CONCLUSION: High BMI1 expression is associated with clinicopathological variables and outcome in BC. However, this association is dependent on the molecular subtypes. Further functional assessment to detect its underlying mechanistic roles in BC subtypes is warranted.
PURPOSE:BMI1, which is a major component of the polycomb group complex 1, is an essential epigenetic repressor of multiple regulatory genes and has been identified as a cancer stem cell (CSC) marker in several cancers. However, its role in breast cancer (BC) remains to be defined. In this study, we have evaluated the prognostic significance of BMI1 among the different molecular subtypes and assessed its association with other breast CSC markers (BCSC). MATERIAL AND METHOD:BMI1 copy number and mRNA was assessed in large and well-characterised cohorts of early-stage BC patients [METABRIC (n = 1980) and the Bc-GenExMiner (n = 9616) databases]. BMI1 protein expression was assessed using tissue microarray and immunohistochemistry in a cohort of 870 invasive BC patients with long-term outcome data and the expression of a panel of BCSC markers was monitored. RESULT: BMI1 expression, prognostic significance and its association with BCSC markers were differed between molecular classes. In the luminal oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+) BC, BMI1 showed significantly higher expression compared to ER- tumours. BMI1 showed positive correlation with favourable prognostic features and it was negatively associated with the expression of key BCSC markers (ALDH1A1, CD24, CD44, CD133, SOX10 and SOX9). High expression of BMI1 was associated with longer breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) independent of other prognostic variables. In the basal triple negative BC subtype, BMI1 expression showed positive association with CD133 and SOX10 and it was significantly associated with shorter BCSS. CONCLUSION: High BMI1 expression is associated with clinicopathological variables and outcome in BC. However, this association is dependent on the molecular subtypes. Further functional assessment to detect its underlying mechanistic roles in BC subtypes is warranted.
Entities:
Keywords:
BMI1; Breast cancer; Breast cancer stem markers; Oestrogen receptor positive; Outcome
Authors: Young Jin Choi; Yoon La Choi; Eun Yoon Cho; Young Kee Shin; Ki Woong Sung; Yu Kyeong Hwang; Sang Jin Lee; Gu Kong; Jeong Eon Lee; Jee Soo Kim; Jung Han Kim; Jung-Hyun Yang; Seok Jin Nam Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2008-01-29 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Dalia M Abd El-Rehim; Graham Ball; Sarah E Pinder; Emad Rakha; Claire Paish; John F R Robertson; Douglas Macmillan; Roger W Blamey; Ian O Ellis Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2005-09-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Pascal Jézéquel; Mario Campone; Wilfried Gouraud; Catherine Guérin-Charbonnel; Christophe Leux; Gabriel Ricolleau; Loïc Campion Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2011-03-31 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Emad A Rakha; Devika Agarwal; Andrew R Green; Ibraheem Ashankyty; Ian O Ellis; Graham Ball; Mohammed A Alaskandarany Journal: Histopathology Date: 2016-12-28 Impact factor: 5.087
Authors: Bernard Pereira; Suet-Feung Chin; Oscar M Rueda; Hans-Kristian Moen Vollan; Elena Provenzano; Helen A Bardwell; Michelle Pugh; Linda Jones; Roslin Russell; Stephen-John Sammut; Dana W Y Tsui; Bin Liu; Sarah-Jane Dawson; Jean Abraham; Helen Northen; John F Peden; Abhik Mukherjee; Gulisa Turashvili; Andrew R Green; Steve McKinney; Arusha Oloumi; Sohrab Shah; Nitzan Rosenfeld; Leigh Murphy; David R Bentley; Ian O Ellis; Arnie Purushotham; Sarah E Pinder; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Helena M Earl; Paul D Pharoah; Mark T Ross; Samuel Aparicio; Carlos Caldas Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Mohammed A Aleskandarany; Sultan Sonbul; Rachel Surridge; Abhik Mukherjee; Carlos Caldas; Maria Diez-Rodriguez; Ibraheem Ashankyty; Khalil I Albrahim; Ahmed M Elmouna; Ritu Aneja; Stewart G Martin; Ian O Ellis; Andrew R Green; Emad A Rakha Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2017-08-22 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Emad A Rakha; Sarah E Pinder; John M S Bartlett; Merdol Ibrahim; Jane Starczynski; Pauline J Carder; Elena Provenzano; Andrew Hanby; Sally Hales; Andrew H S Lee; Ian O Ellis Journal: J Clin Pathol Date: 2014-12-08 Impact factor: 3.411