Literature DB >> 27782306

Prognostic stratification of oestrogen receptor-positive HER2-negative lymph node-negative class of breast cancer.

Emad A Rakha1, Devika Agarwal2, Andrew R Green1, Ibraheem Ashankyty3, Ian O Ellis1, Graham Ball2, Mohammed A Alaskandarany1,3.   

Abstract

AIMS: Multigene assay is recommended currently for prognostic stratification of the clinically indeterminate group of breast cancer (BC) patients defined as lymph node (LN)-negative, oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative (LN- /ER+ /HER2- ) to determine the use of chemotherapy. However, this cohort, comprising approximately 40% of BC, is not a homogeneous group and shows variable outcome. This study aims to determine the prognostic value of routinely assessed variables, singly and in combination, in LN- /ER+ /HER2- BC patients. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 830 LN- /ER+ /HER2- chemotherapy-naive BCs were investigated. The prognostic value of histological grade, tumour size, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), progesterone receptor (PgR) and Ki67 labelling index (Ki67LI) was assessed. In this series, only 25% of patients received hormone therapy. Median follow-up was 172 months. In the whole cohort, tumour grade, size, LVI, PgR and Ki67LI were correlated highly with outcome in a time-dependent manner. The outcome of this group varied widely from 97% (20% of cases) to 50% survival rate after 10-year follow-up using a combination of these markers. A prognostic index (Nottingham Px) incorporating grade, size, PgR and Ki67LI, was developed. The index can stratify the whole cohort robustly as well as the higher-risk subgroup (NPI score >3.4) into distinct prognostic classes.
CONCLUSION: Current routinely assessed variables can provide additional prognostic information in LN- /ER+ /HER2- BC. The proposed (Nottingham Px) index can stratify the BC clinically indeterminate group of patients into excellent and poor prognostic subgroups and can be used to identify reliably patients for systemic chemotherapy or further multigene prognostic testing. Performance of prognostic variables in these tumours is time-dependent, and should be considered in future studies.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Oncotype DX; breast carcinoma; prognostic classifications; routine practice

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27782306     DOI: 10.1111/his.13108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histopathology        ISSN: 0309-0167            Impact factor:   5.087


  11 in total

1.  The prognostic significance of BMI1 expression in invasive breast cancer is dependent on its molecular subtypes.

Authors:  Maryam Althobiti; Abir A Muftah; Mohammed A Aleskandarany; Chitra Joseph; Michael S Toss; Andrew Green; Emad Rakha
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Comparison of Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score® with other risk assessment tools including the Nottingham Prognostic Index in the identification of patients with low-risk invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Maura Bríd Cotter; Alex Dakin; Aoife Maguire; Janice M Walshe; M John Kennedy; Barbara Dunne; Ciarán Ó Riain; Cecily M Quinn
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Myxovirus resistance 1 (MX1) is an independent predictor of poor outcome in invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Abrar I Aljohani; Chitra Joseph; Sasagu Kurozumi; Omar J Mohammed; Islam M Miligy; Andrew R Green; Emad A Rakha
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  The prognostic significance of wild-type isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) in breast cancer.

Authors:  Abrar I Aljohani; Michael S Toss; Sasagu Kurozumi; Chitra Joseph; Mohammed A Aleskandarany; Islam M Miligy; Rokaya El Ansari; Nigel P Mongan; Ian O Ellis; Andrew R Green; Emad A Rakha
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 4.624

5.  The prognostic significance of interferon-stimulated gene 15 (ISG15) in invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Yousif A Kariri; Mansour Alsaleem; Chitra Joseph; Sami Alsaeed; Abrar Aljohani; Sho Shiino; Omar J Mohammed; Michael S Toss; Andrew R Green; Emad A Rakha
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Nucleolar protein 10 (NOP10) predicts poor prognosis in invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Khloud A Elsharawy; Maryam Althobiti; Omar J Mohammed; Abrar I Aljohani; Michael S Toss; Andrew R Green; Emad A Rakha
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-11-08       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Defining the area of mitoses counting in invasive breast cancer using whole slide image.

Authors:  Asmaa Ibrahim; Ayat G Lashen; Ayaka Katayama; Raluca Mihai; Graham Ball; Michael S Toss; Emad A Rakha
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 8.209

8.  Approach for a Clinically Useful Comprehensive Classification of Vascular and Neural Aspects of Diabetic Retinal Disease.

Authors:  Michael D Abramoff; Patrice E Fort; Ian C Han; K Thiran Jayasundera; Elliott H Sohn; Thomas W Gardner
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Research-based PAM50 signature and long-term breast cancer survival.

Authors:  Minya Pu; Karen Messer; Sherri R Davies; Tammi L Vickery; Emily Pittman; Barbara A Parker; Matthew J Ellis; Shirley W Flatt; Catherine R Marinac; Sandahl H Nelson; Elaine R Mardis; John P Pierce; Loki Natarajan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  The nucleolar-related protein Dyskerin pseudouridine synthase 1 (DKC1) predicts poor prognosis in breast cancer.

Authors:  Khloud A Elsharawy; Omar J Mohammed; Mohammed A Aleskandarany; Ayman Hyder; Hekmat L El-Gammal; Mohamed I Abou-Dobara; Andrew R Green; Leslie W Dalton; Emad A Rakha
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 9.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.