| Literature DB >> 32523363 |
Masoume Mansouri1, Naseh Pahlavani2, Farshad Sharifi3, Mehdi Varmaghani4, Azad Shokri5, Hamid Yaghubi6, Omid Asbaghi7, Abasali Keshtkar8, Yousef Moghadas Tabrizi9, Omid Sadeghi10,11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a chronic condition that its prevalence is increasing at an alarming rate. Findings on the association between dairy consumption and hypertension are conflicting and few data are available in the Middle East. AIM: To assess the association between dairy consumption and hypertension among a large population of university students.Entities:
Keywords: blood pressure; dairy; diet; hypertension; students
Year: 2020 PMID: 32523363 PMCID: PMC7234968 DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S248592
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes ISSN: 1178-7007 Impact factor: 3.168
Demographic Characteristics and Dietary Habits of Participants Across Categories of Dairy Consumption (n=67,011)
| <1 serv/wk | 1 serv/wk | 2–3 serv/wk | ≥4 serv/wk | P-trend* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | 4259 (6.3) | 15,458 (23.1) | 31,765 (47.4) | 15,529 (23.2) | |
| Age (years) | 21.16 ± 3.81 | 21.27 ± 3.70 | 21.55 ± 3.98 | 21.47 ± 4.19 | <0.001 |
| Sex (female) (%) | 55.2 | 54.0 | 54.3 | 59.4 | <0.001 |
| Weight (kg) | 63.64 ± 13.96 | 63.07 ± 13.20 | 64.22 ± 13.99 | 65.64 ± 14.69 | <0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.39 ± 3.93 | 22.18 ± 3.77 | 22.47 ± 3.98 | 23.00 ± 4.20 | <0.001 |
| Marital status (married) (%) | 8.9 | 8.3 | 10.1 | 10.7 | <0.001 |
| Education (graduated) (%) | 34.2 | 36.0 | 39.7 | 34.8 | <0.001 |
| Having a job (%) | 11.6 | 8.8 | 9.6 | 10.8 | <0.001 |
| Current smoker (%) | 33.3 | 15.7 | 6.4 | 5.3 | <0.001 |
| Physical activity (active)a (%) | 36.7 | 34.6 | 39.2 | 45.6 | <0.001 |
| Sleep pattern (regular) (%) | 49.1 | 52.9 | 60.2 | 65.9 | <0.001 |
| Economic status (low) (%) | 29.1 | 22.2 | 16.8 | 13.1 | <0.001 |
| Supplement use (%) | 9.6 | 9.3 | 10.0 | 12.1 | <0.001 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 78.84 ± 19.90 | 75.62 ± 17.04 | 74.34 ± 15.28 | 74.49 ± 15.65 | <0.001 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 110.47 ± 27.43 | 107.54 ± 20.98 | 108.56 ± 22.00 | 108.38 ± 25.39 | 0.16 |
| Family history of hypertension (%) | 21.5 | 20.1 | 19.1 | 19.3 | <0.001 |
| Family history of diabetes (%) | 13.9 | 12.9 | 12.8 | 13.8 | 0.08 |
| Overweight and obesity (%) | 21.2 | 19.6 | 22.2 | 26.1 | <0.001 |
| Breakfast skipping (%) | 55.6 | 55.4 | 46.0 | 35.5 | <0.001 |
| Dietary Intakes | |||||
| Fruit (≥4 serv/d) (%) | 43.1 | 48.4 | 62.5 | 75.3 | <0.001 |
| Vegetable (≥4 serv/wk) (%) | 11.3 | 7.2 | 11.5 | 24.1 | <0.001 |
| Fast food (≥4 time/wk) (%) | 4.1 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 1.0 | <0.001 |
| SSBs (≥3 time/wk) (%) | 10.9 | 5.5 | 5.3 | 7.9 | <0.001 |
| Sweets (≥4 serv/wk) (%) | 14.7 | 10.1 | 11.7 | 16.9 | <0.001 |
| Whole grains (≥4 serv/wk) (%) | 3.2 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 2.1 | <0.001 |
Notes: Data are presented as mean (SD) or percent. *Obtained from ANOVA or Chi-square, where appropriate. aThose who exercised 3 time/wk or more lasting 30 minutes in each time.
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; SSBs, sugar-sweetened beverages.
Odds Ratios and 95% CIs for Hypertension Across Categories of Dairy Consumption Among Whole Population (n=67,011)
| <1 serv/wk | 1 serv/wk | 2–3 serv/wk | ≥4 serv/wk | P-trend* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | 4259 (6.3) | 15,458 (23.1) | 31,765 (47.4) | 15,529 (23.2) | |
| Crude | 1.00 | 0.32 (0.29–0.34) | 0.10 (0.09–0.11) | 0.08 (0.07–0.09) | <0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 0.32 (0.29–0.34) | 0.10 (0.09–0.11) | 0.08 (0.07–0.09) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 0.49 (0.43–0.56) | 0.24 (0.21–0.28) | 0.18 (0.15–0.21) | <0.001 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 0.47 (0.41–0.54) | 0.22 (0.19–0.26) | 0.16 (0.13–0.19) | <0.001 |
| Model 4 | 1.00 | 0.47 (0.41–0.55) | 0.22 (0.19–0.26) | 0.15 (0.13–0.18) | <0.001 |
Notes: Data are presented as OR (95% CI). *Obtained from binary logistic regression. Model 1: adjusted for age and sex. Model 2: additionally adjusted for marital status, education, occupation, physical activity, economic status, smoking, sleep pattern, family history of hypertension and diabetes, breakfast skipping, and supplement use. Model 3: further adjustment for dietary intake of fruits, vegetables, fast foods, sugar-sweetened beverages, whole grains, and sweets. Model 4: additionally control for BMI.
Odds Ratios and 95% CIs for Hypertension Across Categories of Dairy Consumption Stratified by Sex, BMI Status and Family History of Hypertension
| <1 serv/wk | 1 serv/wk | 2–3 serv/wk | ≥4 serv/wk | P-trend* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Males (n=29,858) | |||||
| N (%) | 1908 (6.4) | 7110 (23.8) | 14,532 (48.7) | 6308 (21.1) | |
| Crude | 1.00 | 0.39 (0.34–0.44) | 0.15 (0.13–0.17) | 0.14 (0.12–0.17) | <0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 0.39 (0.34–0.44) | 0.15 (0.13–0.17) | 0.14 (0.12–0.17) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 0.51 (0.43–0.61) | 0.24 (0.20–0.29) | 0.20 (0.16–0.25) | <0.001 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 0.48 (0.39–0.58) | 0.21 (0.17–0.26) | 0.16 (0.12–0.20) | <0.001 |
| Model 4 | 1.00 | 0.48 (0.39–0.58) | 0.21 (0.17–0.25) | 0.14 (0.11–0.18) | <0.001 |
| Females (n=37,153) | |||||
| N (%) | 2351 (6.3) | 8348 (22.5) | 17,233 (46.4) | 9221 (24.8) | |
| Crude | 1.00 | 0.28 (0.25–0.31) | 0.08 (0.07–0.09) | 0.05 (0.04–0.06) | <0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 0.28 (0.25–0.31) | 0.07 (0.06–0.08) | 0.05 (0.04–0.06) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 0.46 (0.37–0.58) | 0.23 (0.18–0.29) | 0.16 (0.13–0.21) | <0.001 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 0.45 (0.36–0.57) | 0.23 (0.18–0.29) | 0.16 (0.12–0.20) | <0.001 |
| Model 4 | 1.00 | 0.46 (0.36–0.58) | 0.23 (0.18–0.30) | 0.16 (0.12–0.21) | <0.001 |
| Normal-Weight (n=51,837) | |||||
| N (%) | 3345 (6.5) | 12,382 (23.9) | 24,650 (47.6) | 11,461 (22.1) | |
| Crude | 1.00 | 0.34 (0.31–0.38) | 0.10 (0.09–0.11) | 0.07 (0.06–0.08) | <0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 0.34 (0.31–0.38) | 0.10 (0.09–0.11) | 0.07 (0.06–0.08) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 0.52 (0.44–0.61) | 0.24 (0.21–0.29) | 0.16 (0.13–0.20) | <0.001 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 0.49 (0.41–0.58) | 0.23 (0.19–0.27) | 0.15 (0.12–0.18) | <0.001 |
| Overweight or Obese (n=15,174) | |||||
| N (%) | 914 (6.0) | 3076 (20.3) | 7115 (46.9) | 4068 (26.8) | |
| Crude | 1.00 | 0.26 (0.21–0.31) | 0.09 (0.08–0.11) | 0.09 (0.07–0.11) | <0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 0.26 (0.21–0.31) | 0.09 (0.08–0.11) | 0.09 (0.07–0.11) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 0.40 (0.31–0.52) | 0.21 (0.16–0.27) | 0.18 (0.14–0.24) | <0.001 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 0.39 (0.30–0.51) | 0.19 (0.15–0.25) | 0.15 (0.11–0.21) | <0.001 |
| Not-Having Family History of Hypertension (n=53,926) | |||||
| N (%) | 3344 (6.2) | 12,348 (22.9) | 25,701 (47.7) | 12,533 (23.2) | |
| Crude | 1.00 | 0.30 (0.28–0.34) | 0.10 (0.09–0.11) | 0.07 (0.06–0.08) | <0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 0.30 (0.28–0.34) | 0.10 (0.09–0.11) | 0.07 (0.06–0.08) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 0.48 (0.41–0.56) | 0.23 (0.20–0.27) | 0.16 (0.13–0.19) | <0.001 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 0.45 (0.39–0.53) | 0.21 (0.18–0.25) | 0.14 (0.11–0.17) | <0.001 |
| Model 4 | 1.00 | 0.46 (0.39–0.54) | 0.21 (0.18–0.25) | 0.13 (0.11–0.16) | <0.001 |
| Having Family History of Hypertension (n=13,085) | |||||
| N (%) | 915 (7.0) | 3110 (23.8) | 6064 (46.3) | 2996 (22.9) | |
| Crude | 1.00 | 0.36 (0.30–0.43) | 0.12 (0.10–0.15) | 0.12 (0.09–0.15) | <0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 0.36 (0.30–0.43) | 0.12 (0.10–0.14) | 0.11 (0.09–0.14) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 0.55 (0.41–0.73) | 0.28 (0.21–0.37) | 0.28 (0.20–0.39) | <0.001 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 0.52 (0.39–0.71) | 0.27 (0.20–0.36) | 0.26 (0.18–0.36) | <0.001 |
| Model 4 | 1.00 | 0.53 (0.39–0.72) | 0.26 (0.19–0.72) | 0.24 (0.17–0.35) | <0.001 |
Notes: Data are presented as OR (95% CI). *Obtained from binary logistic regression, Model 1: adjusted for age and sex (not included in the sex-stratified analysis). Model 2: additionally adjusted for marital status, education, occupation, physical activity, economic status, smoking, sleep pattern, family history of hypertension (not included in the stratified analysis based on family history of hypertension) and diabetes, breakfast skipping and supplement use. Model 3: further adjustment for dietary intake of fruits, vegetables, fast foods, sugar-sweetened beverages, whole grains, and sweets and desserts. Model 4: additionally control for BMI (not included in the BMI status-stratified analysis).