| Literature DB >> 35719707 |
Azizeh Farshbaf-Khalili1, Alireza Ostadrahimi2, Mojgan Mirghafourvand3, Khatereh Ataei-Almanghadim4, Sara Dousti5, Amir Mehdi Iranshahi6.
Abstract
Aims of the Study. Reducing estrogen levels due to menopause activates oxidative and inflammatory processes, which causes symptoms of menopause, anxiety, and sexual dysfunction. As a suggestion, potential anti-inflammatory and antioxidant agents such as curcumin and vitamin E could be used as an effective alternative treatment due to parsimony, suitable access, and fewer side effects. Therefore, the present study was conducted to find out whether supplementation with curcumin and vitamin E affects inflammatory-oxidative stress biomarkers and primary symptoms of menopause in healthy postmenopausal women. Methods Used to Conduct the Study. The present study is a triple-blind parallel randomized controlled trial. Eighty-four eligible postmenopausal women aged 40 to 60 years old were randomly assigned into three groups using block randomization with an allocation ratio of 1 : 1 : 1. The curcumin group received one capsule containing 500 mg curcumin twice a day, the vitamin E group received one 500 mg capsule of vitamin E twice a day, and the placebo group took two placebo capsules containing 500 mg of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) daily for eight weeks. Demographic and anthropometric characteristics, dietary intake, and early symptoms of menopause were collected at baseline. Serum levels of total antioxidant capacity (TAC), malondialdehyde (MDA), and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were measured at baseline and after the intervention. Intervention safety and satisfaction with the intervention were also evaluated. Results of the Study. Eighty-one participants completed the trial and were finally analyzed. There were no statistically significant differences in demographic characteristics and dietary intake of participants (except for vitamin C intake, P=0.023) between the groups at baseline. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) score of total menopause symptoms, depression, anxiety, psychological, vasomotor, and physical domains significantly decreased within all groups (P < 0.05). Between-group analyses indicated that decreasing the mean score of anxiety in the vitamin E group was significantly more than in the placebo group (P=0.026). The mean (SD) serum levels of MDA and hs-CRP significantly decreased only in the curcumin group (P=0.009 and P=0.025, respectively). Serum levels of TAC significantly increased in curcumin and vitamin E groups (P < 0.001 and P=0.006, respectively). Conclusions Drawn from the Study and Clinical Implications. Curcumin could improve the oxidative stress (MDA and TAC) and inflammatory (hs-CRP) biomarkers. Vitamin E may also improve the antioxidant status by increasing the TAC levels. The alleviation of anxiety in the vitamin E group was more than in the placebo group. Clinical Trial Registration. The trial was registered at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (https://irct.ir/IRCT20131009014957N6).Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35719707 PMCID: PMC9203212 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6339715
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nutr Metab ISSN: 2090-0724
Figure 1Flow diagram of participants' summary.
Baseline characteristics of participants among the study groups.
| Variable | Curcumin ( | Vitamin E ( | Placebo ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year)† | 52.0 (2.5) | 52.5 (3.2) | 52.1 (2.7) | 0.764 |
| Menopause age (year)† | 49.3 (2.2) | 49.6 (2.8) | 48.6 (3.5) | 0.358 |
| Childbirth† | 2.5 (1.0) | 2.8 (0.9) | 2.6 (1.0) | 0.646 |
| Family members† | 1.6 (0.5) | 1.5 (0.6) | 1.4 (0.5) | 0.235 |
| Weight (kg)† | 72.3 (8.8) | 71.8 (10.9) | 74.0 (10.4) | 0.710 |
| BMI (kg/m2)† | 30.5 (4.6) | 29.9 (4.4) | 30.1 (3.7) | 0.880 |
| Age (year)† | 52.0 (2.5) | 52.5 (3.2) | 52.1 (2.7) | 0.764 |
| Total physical activity (MET‑min.week)± | 396.6 (336.6–815.5) | 442.0 (326.5–1026.5) | 386.5 (340.5–864.5) | 0.588 |
| Marriage status‡ | Single and widow | 5 (17.9) | 3 (10.7) | 3 (10.7) |
| Married | 23 (82.1) | 25 (89.3) | 25 (89.3) | |
| Educational level‡ | Illiterate and primary | 13 (46.4) | 13 (46.4) | 13 (46.4) |
| Secondary and high school | 6 (21.4) | 11 (39.3) | 8 (28.6) | |
| Diploma and more | 9 (32.1) | 4 (14.3) | 7 (25.0) | |
| Occupation‡ | Housewife | 27 (96.4) | 26 (92.9) | 28 (100.0) |
| Occupied andretired | 1 (3.6) | 2 (7.1) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Husband education‡ | Illiterate andprimary | 2 (7.4) | 8 (28.6) | 8 (28.6) |
| Secondary andhigh school | 12 (44.4) | 10 (39.3) | 7 (25.0) | |
| Diploma andmore | 14 (50.0) | 9 (33.3) | 13 (46.4) | |
| Husband occupation‡ | Self-occupied | 8 (29.6) | 13 (46.4) | 16 (57.1) |
| Employee | 5 (17.9) | 3 (10.7) | 4 (14.3) | |
| Retired | 13 (46.4) | 10 (37.0) | 7 (25.0) | |
| Worker | 2 (7.1) | 2 (7.1) | 1 (3.6) | |
| Family income‡ | Sufficient | 13 (46.4) | 11 (40.7) | 15 (53.6) |
| Less than sufficient | 15 (53.6) | 16 (59.3) | 13 (46.4) | |
| Life satisfaction‡ | Yes | 26 (92.9) | 24 (92.3) | 22 (84.6) |
| No | 2 (7.1) | 2 (7.7) | 4 (15.4) | |
| Smoker husband‡ | Yes | 7 (25.0) | 7 (25.0) | 8 (28.6) |
| No | 21 (75.5) | 21 (75.5) | 20 (71.4) | |
| Living with husband family‡ | Yes | 1 (3.6) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (3.6) |
| No | 27 (96.4) | 28 (100.0) | 27 (96.4) |
BMI: body mass index, †mean (SD), ±median (p25–p75), ‡number (percent); one-way ANOVA, chi-square, linear by linear chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis.
Comparison of dietary intake between participants among the study groups.
| Variable | Curcumin ( | Vitamin E ( | Placebo ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy (kcal/day)† | 2006.45 (532.8) | 2174.6 (268.9) | 2291.0 (345.1) | 0.815 |
| Carbohydrate (g/day)† | 280.8 (70.1) | 328.1 (38.1) | 363.5 (49.7) | 0.555 |
| Protein (g/day)† | 54.27 (12.9) | 58.1 (12.2) | 63.7 (17.7) | 0.572 |
| Total fat (g/day)† | 67.3 (24.8) | 61.7 (12.8) | 63.1 (13.8) | 0.974 |
| SFA (g/day)† | 28.9 (7.5) | 23.0 (3.0) | 26.4 (4.6) | 0.740 |
| PUFA (g/day)† | 22.0 (6.3) | 23.8 (3.8) | 21.3 (3.4) | 0.923 |
| MUFA (g/day)† | 33.6 (9.2) | 31.7 (5.1) | 30.9 (4.4) | 0.959 |
| Total fiber (g/day)† | 43.1 (6.4) | 54.6 (7.4) | 50.9 (5.6) | 0.522 |
| Vitamin E (mg/day)† | 16.7 (3.4) | 22.1 (5.5) | 17.7 (2.3) | 0.584 |
| Vitamin C (mg/day)† | 129.7 (21.1) | 146.6 (35.7) | 193.5 (46.7) | 0.023 |
| Vitamin A (mg/day)† | 569.7 (109.3) | 490.7 (39.9) | 786.1 (203.1) | 0.051 |
| Vitamin D ( | 1.7 (0.87) | 1.6 (0.2) | 2.1 (0.63) | 0.820 |
| Selenium ( | 92.5 (31.3) | 99.2 (15.1) | 111.3 (25.3) | 0.826 |
| Zinc (mg/day)† | 9.1 (2.1) | 8.8 (1.8) | 11.2 (2.4) | 0.451 |
| Turmeric (mg/day) | 533.6 (454.5) | 576.5 (322.5) | 592.2 (345.5) | 0.688 |
SFA: saturated fatty acid, PUFA: polyunsaturated fatty acid, MUFA: monounsaturated fatty acid; †Mean (SD); one-way ANOVA.
The score of menopause symptoms among the study groups.
| Menopause symptoms | Curcumin ( | Vitamin E ( | Placebo ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Baseline† | 6.4 (2.6) | 6.9 (2.3) | 6.4 (1.9) | 0.680 |
| After 8 weeks† | 5.7 (2.6) | 5.1 (2.4) | 5.8 (1.8) | 0.021 |
| MD (95% CI) | −0.8 (−1.5 to −0.01) | −1.8 (−2.5 to −1.2) | −0.6 (−1.1 to −0.1) | |
|
| 0.046 | <0.001 | 0.032 | |
|
| ||||
| Baseline† | 6.2 (2.8) | 5.0 (2.3) | 5.1 (3.0) | 0.084 |
| After 8 weeks† | 4.7 (2.9) | 3.6 (2.4) | 3.7 (2.5) | 0.923 |
| MD (95% CI) | −1.5 (−2.5 to −0.5) | −1.4 (−2.0 to −0.8) | −1.4 (−2.0 to −0.94) | |
|
| 0.006 | 0.001 | <0.001 | |
|
| ||||
| Baseline† | 12.6 (4.7) | 11.9 (3.6) | 11.5 (4.3) | 0.455 |
| After 8 weeks† | 10.4 (4.9) | 8.6 (3.9) | 9.4 (3.9) | 0.058 |
| MD (95% CI) | −2.3 (−3.9 to −0.6) | −3.2 (−4.2 to −2.3) | −2.0 (−2.8 to −1.2) | |
|
| 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
|
| ||||
| Baseline† | 5.2 (1.5) | 5.6 (1.9) | 5.2 (1.9) | 0.358 |
| After 8 weeks† | 4.1 (1.82) | 3.9 (1.3) | 4.2 (2.1) | 0.107 |
| MD (95% CI) | −1.1 (−1.8 to −0.4) | −1.7 (−2.5 to −0.8) | −1. 0 (−1.5 to −0.5) | |
|
| <0.001 | >0.001 | 0.001 | |
|
| ||||
| Baseline† | 4.4 (1.0) | 4.0 (1.9) | 4.7 (1.1) | 0.746 |
| After 8 weeks† | 2.9 (1.6) | 2.1 (1.7) | 2.8 (1.7) | 0.551 |
| MD (95% CI) | −1.5 (−2.2 to −0.8) | −1.8 (−2.6 to −1.1) | −1.9 (−2. 4 to −1.4) | |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
|
| ||||
| Baseline† | 1.4 (0.9) | 1.9 (0.8) | 1.2 (0.9) | 0.467 |
| After 8 weeks† | 1.4 (0.9) | 1.7 (1.0) | 1.1 (0.9) | 0.737 |
| MD (95% CI) | 0.0 (−0.4 to 0.4) | −0.3 (−0.6 to 0.1) | −0.05 (−0.15 to 0.05) | |
|
| 1.00 | 0.135 | 0.330 | |
|
| ||||
| Baseline† | 23.6 (5.9) | 23.4 (3.6) | 22.5 (4.6) | 0.949 |
| After 8 weeks† | 18.8 (7.2) | 16.4 (5.1) | 17.5 (5.0) | 0.048 |
| MD (95% CI) | −4.8 (−7.4 to −2.1) | −7.0 (−8.8 to −5.2) | −5.0 (−6.5 to −3.5) | |
|
| 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
MD: mean difference, CI: confidence interval; †Mean (SD); one-way ANOVA, analysis of covariance adjusted for baseline measures and confounding factors (vitamin C intake), paired-samples t-test.
Serum levels of MDA, TAC, and hs-CRP among the study groups.
| Variable | Curcumin ( | Vitamin E ( | Placebo ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Baseline† | 2.4 (0.9) | 2.4 (0.9) | 2.3 (1.29) | 0.920 |
| After 8 weeks† | 1.9 (0.6) | 2.2 (0.7) | 2.1 (1.0) | 0.993 |
| MD (95% CI) | −0.5 (−0.8 to −0.1) | −0.2 (−0.9 to 0.40) | −0.2 (−0.6 to 0.1) | |
|
| 0.009 | 0.195 | 0.230 | |
|
| ||||
| Baseline† | 1.3 (0.3) | 1.3 (0.20) | 1.5 (0.3) | 0.820 |
| After 8 weeks† | 1. 5 (0.3) | 1.4 (0.20) | 1.6 (0.3) | 0.997 |
| MD (95% CI) | 0.2 (0.1 to 0.3) | 0.1 (0.01 to 0.2) | 0.05 (−0.01 to 0.1) | |
|
| <0.001 | 0.006 | 0.118 | |
|
| ||||
| Baseline† | 5.1 (3. 4) | 4.9 (2.3) | 5.1 (3.3) | 0.998 |
| After 8 weeks† | 4.6 (2.6) | 4.8 (2.3) | 4.8 (3.3) | 0.861 |
| MD (95% CI) | −0.5 (−0.8 to −0.2) | −0.1 (−0.7 to 0.5) | −0.3 (−0.7 to 0.1) | |
|
| 0.025 | 0.718 | 0.219 | |
MDA: malondialdehyde, TAC: total antioxidant capacity, hs-CRP: high sensitivity C-reactive protein, MD: mean difference, CI: confidence interval; †mean (SD), P‡P value E/P: PP value of pairwise comparison between vitamin E and placebo groups, P§P value C/P: PP value of pairwise comparison between curcumin and placebo groups; one-way ANOVA by Tukey, analysis of covariance adjusted for baseline measures and confounding factors (vitamin C intake), paired-samples t-test.
Satisfaction with supplementation among the study groups.
| Satisfaction | Curcumin ( | Vitamin E ( | Placebo ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completely satisfied† | 21 (80.8) | 23 (85.2) | 25 (89.3) |
| Satisfied† | 2 (7.7) | 2 (7.4) | 0 (0.0) |
| Neither dissatisfied nor satisfied† | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Dissatisfied† | 3 (11.5) | 2 (7.4) | 3 (10.7) |
| Completely dissatisfied† | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
†Number (percent).