Literature DB >> 32522295

Using an air purifier as a supplementary protective measure in dental clinics during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Bin Zhao1,2, Na An3, Chen Chen1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32522295      PMCID: PMC7411437          DOI: 10.1017/ice.2020.292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor—The current outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to spread. The total confirmed cases worldwide were >6.0 million by June 2, 2020, and the number is increasing in countries like the United States and across Europe. Measures including social distancing, border closures, and the epicenter lockdown have been taken to control the spread of this virus. Recently, Dave et al[1] proposed the challenges of dental care services during the COVID-19 pandemic. We understand that routine dentistry is suspended for precaution of aerosols formed by using drills or ultrasonic devices. Here, we want to highlight the possibility that using air purifiers may serve as a supplementary protective measure in dental clinics and units for organized emergency dental care, especially since the current shortage of personal protective equipment is endangering healthcare workers worldwide.[2] During dental treatments, saliva may become aerosolized, and microorganisms in such aerosols from the oral cavity contribute to the spread of infectious diseases.[3] Our previous study proved that running air purifiers in suitable locations can remove aerosols in dental clinics significantly, resulting in the reduction of dental healthcare worker (DHCWs) exposure to aerosols ranging from 80% to 95%.[4] Regarding to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a recent study found that the virus appears most commonly in aerosols in the submicron (0.25–1.0 μm) and supermicron ranges (>2.5 μm).[5] Hence, we measured size-dependent filtration efficiency of air purifiers integrated with 2 types of widely used filter media respectively: fine filters (F6 class) and high-efficiency particulate air filters (HEPA, H12 class) (Fig. 1). On average, an air purifier with F6 class filter media removed 54% of aerosols that may carry airborne SARS-CoV-2, while the one with H12 class filter media removed 83% of such aerosols. Therefore, for dental treatments generating a large amount of aerosols, air purifiers with HEPA may be more effective and protective for DHCWs than air purifiers with fine filters. Also, air purifiers with F6 class filter media may still have some efficacy. Notably, the measured filtration efficiency was obtained by measuring aerosol concentration before and after air flow through the filter media on first use. For actual air purifier use, the air is recirculated through the filter media, resulting in a higher efficiency of aerosol removal in enclosed spaces, including dental clinics and units.
Fig. 1.

Size-dependent filtration efficiency of fine filters (F6) and HEPA filters (H12).

Size-dependent filtration efficiency of fine filters (F6) and HEPA filters (H12). Further studies may be needed to provide more direct evidence for the protective effectiveness of air purifiers in dental clinics and units. However, considering the urgent need for emergency dental care during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is highly advisable to use air purifiers as an easy-to-use, portable, inexpensive, and high-efficiency precaution measure, especially in situations where air purifiers are already available.
  9 in total

1.  Effects of Air Purifiers on the Spread of Simulated Respiratory Droplet Nuclei and Virus Aggregates.

Authors:  Ki Joon Heo; Inyong Park; Gunhee Lee; Keejung Hong; Bangwoo Han; Jae Hee Jung; Sang Bok Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Are the Portable Air Cleaners (PAC) really effective to terminate airborne SARS-CoV-2?

Authors:  María Rodríguez; M Llanos Palop; Susana Seseña; Ana Rodríguez
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Optimizing clinical productivity in the otolaryngology clinic during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Amarbir S Gill; Gretchen Oakley; Marc Error; Kerry Kelly; Richard Orlandi; Jeremiah A Alt
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 5.426

Review 4.  The Impact of COVID-19 on the Oral Health of Patients with Special Needs.

Authors:  Ronald Ettinger; Leonardo Marchini; Samuel Zwetchkenbaum
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2022-01-10

5.  Reducing airborne infection risk of COVID-19 by locating air cleaners at proper positions indoor: Analysis with a simple model.

Authors:  Hui Dai; Bin Zhao
Journal:  Build Environ       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 6.456

6.  Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practices among dental practitioners on methods of infection control while carrying out dental procedures during novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.

Authors:  Neetha Shenoy; Vasudev Ballal; Usha Rani; Himani Kotian; Vani Lakshmi
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2021-08-24

Review 7.  Review of indoor aerosol generation, transport, and control in the context of COVID-19.

Authors:  Michael A Kohanski; L James Lo; Michael S Waring
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.858

8.  SARS-CoV-2: characterisation and mitigation of risks associated with aerosol generating procedures in dental practices.

Authors:  Touraj Ehtezazi; David G Evans; Ian D Jenkinson; Philip A Evans; Vijay J Vadgama; Jaimini Vadgama; Fadi Jarad; Nicholas Grey; Robert P Chilcott
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.727

9.  Mitigation of Aerosols Generated During Exercise Testing With a Portable High-Efficiency Particulate Air Filter With Fume Hood.

Authors:  Andrés Garzona-Navas; Pavol Sajgalik; Ibolya Csécs; J Wells Askew; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez; Alexander S Niven; Bruce D Johnson; Thomas G Allison
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 9.410

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.