| Literature DB >> 32521475 |
Cheryl R McCreary1, Andrew E Beaudin2, Arsenije Subotic2, Angela M Zwiers2, Ana Alvarez2, Anna Charlton2, Bradley G Goodyear2, Richard Frayne2, Eric E Smith2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To test the hypotheses that peak skeletonized mean diffusivity (PSMD), a measure of cerebral white matter microstructural disruption, is 1) increased in patients with cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) compared to normal control (NC), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and Alzheimer's disease (AD); 2) associated with neuropsychological test performance among CAA patients; and 3) increased more quickly over one year in CAA than in AD, MCI, and NC.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Cerebral amyloid angiopathy; Cognition; Diffusion; Magnetic resonance imaging
Year: 2020 PMID: 32521475 PMCID: PMC7284130 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102280
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.881
Cohort characteristics at baseline including a summary of MRI findings. Means ± standard deviations are reported for normally distributed continuous measures. Number of individuals with the specified medical history are reported for each cohort. ANOVA group comparison p-values reported.
| Overall (n = 92) | NC (n = 22) | CAA (n = 34) | MCI (n = 21) | AD (n = 15) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y) | 71.0 ± 8.0 | 67.8 ± 9.6 | 74.4 ± 7.4 | 70.6 ± 5.9 | 68.7 ± 7.2 | 0.007 |
| Female (%) | 39 (42.4) | 12 (54.6) | 13 (38.2) | 8 (38.1) | 6 (40.0) | 0.62 |
| Education (y) | 14.6 ± 2.9 | 14.8 ± 2.7 | 13.7 ± 2.7 | 15.2 ± 3.1 | 15.3 ± 3.2 | 0.15 |
| Current Smokers (%) | 4 (4.4) | 1 (4.5) | 2 (5.6) | 0 (0) | 1 (6.3) | 0.72 |
| Past Smokers (%) | 43 (46.7) | 9 (40.9) | 18 (52.8) | 7 (33.3) | 9 (62.5) | 0.33 |
| Hypertension (%) | 40 (43.5) | 2 (9.1) | 26 (76.5) | 7 (33.3) | 5 (31.3) | <0.001 |
| Hypercholestero-lemia (%) | 35 (38.0) | 8 (36.4) | 17 (50.0) | 7 (33.3) | 3 (20.0) | 0.18 |
| Diabetes (%) | 15 (16.3) | 1 (4.6) | 8 (23.5) | 4 (19.0) | 2 (13.3) | 0.29 |
| CAD (%) | 10 (10.9) | 1 (4.6) | 4 (11.8) | 4 (19.0) | 1 (6.7) | 0.45 |
| AFib (%) | 8 (8.7) | 1 (4.6) | 4 (11.8) | 1 (4.8) | 2 (13.3) | 0.69 |
| ICH (%) | 15 (16.3) | 0 (0) | 15 (44.1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | <0.001 |
Summary of neuropsychological assessment scores and MRI findings. Means ± standard deviations are reported for normally distributed continuous measures. Median and interquartile range are reported for the WMH volume as they were not normally distributed. Number of individuals with 1 or more lacunes or CMBs are reported. ANOVA comparison group p-values reported.
| Overall (n = 92) | NC (n = 22) | CAA (n = 34) | MCI (n = 21) | AD (n = 15) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMSE | 26.9 ± 3.3 | 29.4 ± 1.2 | 26.6 ± 3.1 | 27.2 ± 2.3 | 23.7 ± 4.1 | <0.001 |
| Memory z-score | −0.02 ± 0.90 | 0.85 ± 0.60 | −0.10 ± 0 0.86 | −0.21 ± 0.65 | −0.89 ± 0.50 | <0.001 |
| Executive Function z-score | 0.01 ± 0.87 | 0.72 ± 0.59 | −0.20 ± 0.86 | 0.07 ± 0.59 | −0.64 ± 0.89 | <0.001 |
| Processing Speed z-score | −0.05 ± 0.92 | 0.72 ± 0.65 | −0.50 ± 0.88 | 0.26 ± 0.49 | −0.59 ± 0.94 | <0.001 |
| WMH Volume (mL) | 8.1 [3.0–22.5] | 2.4 [0.3–4.7] | 26.6 [11.8–52.9] | 6.0 [3.0–11.4] | 7.9 [4.3–10.6] | <0.001 |
| WMH volume (% ICV) | 0.62 [0.2–3.1] | 0.15 [0.11–0.32] | 1.83 [0.86–3.82] | 0.41 [0.26–0.83] | 0.56 [33–0.72] | <0.001 |
| Log WMH volume (% ICV) | 2.10 ± 1.35 | −1.78 ± 1.13 | 0.50 ± 0.98 | −0.75 ± 1.15 | −0.68 ± 0.84 | <0.001 |
| CMB (%) | 42 (46.2) | 3 (13.6) | 33 (97.1) | 4 (19.1) | 2 (14.3) | <0.001 |
| Lacune baseline (%) | 20 (21.7) | 4 (18.2) | 10 (29.4) | 3 (14.3) | 3 (20.0) | 0.56 |
| Lacune follow-up (%) | 17 (25.4) n = 67 | 2 (14.3) n = 14 | 11 (37.5) n = 27 | 2 (13.3) n = 15 | 2 (18.2) n = 11 | 0.23 |
| cSS (%) | 18 (19.8) | 0 | 18 (52.9) | 0 | 0 | <0.001 |
| Mean Cortical Thickness (mm) | 2.36 ± 0.12 | 2.38 ± 0.11 | 2.37 ± 0.10 | 2.39 ± 0.08 | 2.28 ± 0.17 | 0.03 |
| PSMD baseline (×10−4 mm2/s) | 4.07 ± 1.43 | 3.25 ± 0.49 | 4.97 ± 1.69 | 3.62 ± 1.09 | 3.89 ± 1.05 | 0.002 |
| PSMD follow-up (×10−4 mm2/s) | 4.52 ± 1.51 (n = 64) | 3.76 ± 0.82 (n = 15) | 5.50 ± 1.49 (n = 24) | 4.14 ± 1.58 (n = 17) | 4.03 ± 1.13 (n = 11) | <0.001 |
| ΔPSMD (×10−4 mm2/s) | 0.42 ± 0.53 | 0.46 ± 0.63 | 0.52 ± 0.41 | 0.42 ± 0.85 | 0.33 ± 0.15 | 0.71 |
| Annualized ΔPSMD (%) | 10.2 ± 11.2 | 11.7 ± 11.1 | 11.0 ± 9.6 | 10.5 ± 16.7 | 8.8 ± 5.2 | 0.94 |
| MD baseline (×10−4 mm2/s) | 8.57 ± 0.67 | 8.10 ± 0.42 | 9.03 ± 0.68 | 8.42 ± 0.58 | 8.49 ± 0.43 | <0.001 |
| MD follow-up (×10−4 mm2/s) | 8.74 ± 0.70 | 8.36 ± 0.39 | 9.21 ± 0.66 | 8.48 ± 0.70 | 8.42 ± 0.44 | 0.002 |
| ΔMD (×10−4 mm2/s) | 0.11 ± 0.22 | 0.15 ± 0.16 | 0.17 ± 0.21 | 0.04 ± 0.26 | 0.12 ± 0.04 | 0.09 |
Fig. 1Cross-sectional baseline PSMD across study groups. The baseline PSMD data for each group are shown in box plots. Univariate tests of significance between groups are indicated by the brackets with unadjusted p-values. After adjusting for age, sex, and education, PSMD in CAA was higher than NC (adjusted p = .005) and MCI (adjusted p = .005), while AD was no longer significantly different (adjusted p = .19). The median (solid line within each box), mean (dashed red line within each box), 25th and 75th percentiles (extent of each box) as well as the 10th and 90th percentile (error bars) are shown. Outliers are indicated by the symbols for each group. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 2Associations between PSMD and standardized neuropsychological test scores in CAA. The reported coefficients of determination (R2) and beta coefficients (95% confidence interval) are adjusted for age, sex and education. Two memory z-scores (n = 32) and a processing speed z-score (n = 33) were missing.
Fig. 3Associations between PSMD and other continuous neuroimaging measures in CAA. The reported coefficients of determination (R2) and beta coefficients (95% confidence interval) are adjusted for age and sex. Eight participants were missing total SVD scores (n = 26).
PSMD and mean MD and their associations with cognitive scores. Standardized beta-coefficients and p-values are shown.
| β-coefficients PSMD (95% CI) | PSMD | PSMD Adj R2 | β coefficients mean MD (95% CI) | Mean MD | Mean MD Adj R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Memory z-score | −0.303 (−0.644 to 0.038) | 0.080 | 0.282 | −0.128 (−0.476 to 0.219) | 0.455 | 0.210 |
| MMSE | −0.313 (−0.704 to 0.077) | 0.111 | 0.110 | −0.202 (−0.574 to 0.170) | 0.276 | 0.067 |
| Executive Function z-score | −0.206 (−0.692 to 0.149) | 0.197 | −0.032 | −0.205 (−0.601 to 0.190) | 0.296 | −0.053 |
| Processing Speed z-score | −0.627 (−0.941–0.314) | <0.001 | 0.426 | −0.480 (−0.780 to −0.162) | 0.004 | 0.318 |
| log(WMH) volume | 0.743 (0.482 to 1.004) | <0.001 | 0.587 | 0.722 (0.484 to 0.960) | <0.001 | 0.614 |
| Number of CMBs | 0.086 (−0.332 to 0.503) | 0.677 | −0.056 | 0.227 (−0.159 to 0.613) | 0.239 | −0.014 |
| Cortical thickness | −0.197 (−0.621 to 0.226) | 0.348 | 0.127 | −0.047 (−0.446 to 0.351) | 0.810 | 0.099 |
| CAA SVD score | 0.681 (0.241 to 1.121) | 0.004 | 0.349 | 0.684 (0.338 to 1.030) | <0.001 | 0.459 |
Fig. 4Changes in PSMD across study groups after 1 year. A significant increase in PSMD between baseline and follow-up time points was detected and was similar across all groups. Between group differences at follow-up were the same as baseline differences.