Marieke J H Wermer1, Steven M Greenberg2. 1. Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is diagnosed primarily as a cause of lobar intracerebral hemorrhages (ICH) in elderly patients. With improving MRI techniques, however, the role of CAA in causing other symptoms has become clear. Recognizing the full clinical spectrum of CAA is important for diagnosis and treatment. In this review we summarize recent insights in clinical CAA features, MRI biomarkers, and management. RECENT FINDINGS: The rate of ICH recurrence in CAA is among the highest of all stroke subtypes. Cortical superficial siderosis (cSS) and cortical subarachnoid hemorrhage (cSAH) are important imaging predictors for recurrent ICH. CAA also causes cognitive problems in multiple domains. In patients with nondemented CAA, the risk of developing dementia is high especially after ICH. CAA pathology probably starts years before the first clinical manifestations. The first signs in hereditary CAA are white matter lesions, cortical microinfarcts, and impaired occipital cerebral vasoreactivity. Visible centrum semiovale perivascular spaces, lobar located lacunes, and cortical atrophy are new nonhemorrhagic MRI markers. SUMMARY: CAA should be in the differential diagnosis of elderly patients with lobar ICH but also in those with cognitive decline and episodic transient neurological symptoms. Physicians should be aware of the cognitive effects of CAA. In patients with a previous ICH, cSS, or cSAH, anticoagulation should be considered risky. The increasing number of MRI markers may help to discriminate CAA from other small vessel diseases and dementia subtypes.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is diagnosed primarily as a cause of lobar intracerebral hemorrhages (ICH) in elderly patients. With improving MRI techniques, however, the role of CAA in causing other symptoms has become clear. Recognizing the full clinical spectrum of CAA is important for diagnosis and treatment. In this review we summarize recent insights in clinical CAA features, MRI biomarkers, and management. RECENT FINDINGS: The rate of ICH recurrence in CAA is among the highest of all stroke subtypes. Cortical superficial siderosis (cSS) and cortical subarachnoid hemorrhage (cSAH) are important imaging predictors for recurrent ICH. CAA also causes cognitive problems in multiple domains. In patients with nondemented CAA, the risk of developing dementia is high especially after ICH. CAA pathology probably starts years before the first clinical manifestations. The first signs in hereditary CAA are white matter lesions, cortical microinfarcts, and impaired occipital cerebral vasoreactivity. Visible centrum semiovale perivascular spaces, lobar located lacunes, and cortical atrophy are new nonhemorrhagic MRI markers. SUMMARY: CAA should be in the differential diagnosis of elderly patients with lobar ICH but also in those with cognitive decline and episodic transient neurological symptoms. Physicians should be aware of the cognitive effects of CAA. In patients with a previous ICH, cSS, or cSAH, anticoagulation should be considered risky. The increasing number of MRI markers may help to discriminate CAA from other small vessel diseases and dementia subtypes.
Authors: Aaron P Schultz; Reina W Kloet; Hamid R Sohrabi; Louise van der Weerd; Sanneke van Rooden; Marieke J H Wermer; Laure Grand Moursel; Maqsood Yaqub; Bart N M van Berckel; Pratishtha Chatterjee; Samantha L Gardener; Kevin Taddei; Anne M Fagan; Tammie L Benzinger; John C Morris; Reisa Sperling; Keith Johnson; Randall J Bateman; M Edip Gurol; Mark A van Buchem; Ralph Martins; Jasmeer P Chhatwal; Steven M Greenberg Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2019-08-12 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Hedok Lee; Feng Xu; Xiaodan Liu; Sunil Koundal; Xiaoyue Zhu; Judianne Davis; David Yanez; Joseph Schrader; Aleksandra Stanisavljevic; Douglas L Rothman; Joanna Wardlaw; William E Van Nostrand; Helene Benveniste Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2020-08-13 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Lieke Jäkel; H Bea Kuiperij; Lara P Gerding; Emma E M Custers; Emma van den Berg; Wilmar M T Jolink; Floris H B M Schreuder; Benno Küsters; Catharina J M Klijn; Marcel M Verbeek Journal: Acta Neuropathol Commun Date: 2020-07-06 Impact factor: 7.801
Authors: Cheryl R McCreary; Andrew E Beaudin; Arsenije Subotic; Angela M Zwiers; Ana Alvarez; Anna Charlton; Bradley G Goodyear; Richard Frayne; Eric E Smith Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2020-05-26 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Alvin S Das; Robert W Regenhardt; Meike W Vernooij; Deborah Blacker; Andreas Charidimou; Anand Viswanathan Journal: J Stroke Date: 2019-04-17 Impact factor: 6.967
Authors: Anan Shtaya; Leslie R Bridges; Margaret M Esiri; Joanne Lam-Wong; James A R Nicoll; Delphine Boche; Atticus H Hainsworth Journal: Ann Clin Transl Neurol Date: 2019-07-13 Impact factor: 4.511
Authors: Qingyi Ma; Zhen Zhao; Abhay P Sagare; Yingxi Wu; Min Wang; Nelly Chuqui Owens; Philip B Verghese; Joachim Herz; David M Holtzman; Berislav V Zlokovic Journal: Mol Neurodegener Date: 2018-10-19 Impact factor: 14.195