| Literature DB >> 32518587 |
Ali Taghvaienia1, Arash Zonobitabar1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Positive intervention (PI) is a modern and therapeutic approach broadly based on the principles of positive psychology (Rashid in J Posit Psychol 1:25-40, 2014). PI effects at schools have received little attention to date. However, since PI offers a focus on the positive aspects of human experience (Seligman and Csikszentmihalyi in Am Psychol 55:5-14, 2000), we hypothesized that it could exert positive changes in the teacher-student relationship (TSR) and depression symptoms. Therefore, the mentioned pilot study conducted in this article aimed at evaluating PI effects on depression and TSR among Iranian high school girl students with moderate/mild depression.Entities:
Keywords: Depression; High school; Positive intervention; Students; Teacher–student relationship
Year: 2020 PMID: 32518587 PMCID: PMC7271528 DOI: 10.1186/s13034-020-00331-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health ISSN: 1753-2000 Impact factor: 3.033
PI program overview
| Session number | Name | Goals | Examples of activity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A curve of life | Introduce each individual, explore the meanings of pain and a purpose in life by understanding your past | Draw a curve of life after finding the meanings of the past and present pains |
| 2 | My present | Understand and know yourself | Talk about teacher–student relationship and write 10 sentences that show your understandings of feelings and emotions |
| 3 | A tree of life | Discover the positive and negative aspects of yourself | Draw a tree with good and bad fruits on it and talk about those you wish to keep or throw away |
| 4 | Family story | Discover your positive traits by helping to solve others’ family conflicts | Talk about the family members’ specifications of the past three generations and the conflicts between them after drawing their family tree with lines representing their closeness and problems, Exchange suggestions on resolving problems |
| 5 | Healing of the hurt mind | Seek health by understanding the concept of forgiveness | Share some experiences of the situations, in which you have received emotional scars and have had to forgive and be forgiven by role playing after writing a list of them |
| 6 | Good communication | Practice an appropriate communication | Role play in a recent stressful situation after writing about it or writing it through I-messages |
| 7 | Life and death | Practice coping with the concept of life and death, practice an appropriate communication with others | What would you write on your tombstone when you imagine your grave? Express expectations and needs as well as appreciations to your family and write apologies for the emotional wounds you have left behind during your life, while making your last demands |
| 8 | Planning the future | Accept responsibility for life | Know your wishes in life and make detailed plans |
Fig. 1Distribution of study students
Participant demographics
| PI group ( | Control group ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 17.15 ± 3.28 | 16.84 ± 3.17 | 0.595 |
| Grade | 0.366 | ||
| First grade of high school | 15.54 ± 1.08 | 15.01 ± 0.96 | |
| Second grade of high school | 16.89 ± 0.89 | 16.25 ± 1.14 | |
| Third grade of high school | 17.26 ± 1.78 | 17.47 ± 1.33 | |
| Fourth grade of high school | 18.91 ± 1.38 | 18.63 ± 1.27 | |
| Socio-economic status | 0.771 | ||
| Low, | 11 (45.8) | 12 (46.2) | |
| Medium, | 10 (41.7) | 6 (23.1) | |
| High, | 3 (12.5) | 7 (30.7) |
M mean, SD standard deviation, p values refer to the χ2 test
Mean and standard deviation of the BDI-II and IT-SR variables at the pre-test and the post-test between the two groups
| Variable | Groups | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Depression | PI | 18.23 ± 7.20 | 13.34 ± 7.00 |
| Control | 18.06 ± 8.35 | 18.23 ± 8.49 | |
| Communication | PI | 22.43 ± 4.48 | 26.01 ± 4.69 |
| Control | 24.26 ± 4.27 | 23.93 ± 4.05 | |
| Trust | PI | 14.13 ± 3.31 | 16. 16 ± 3.48 |
| Control | 15.80 ± 2.72 | 15.66 ± 2.53 | |
| Alienation | PI | 11.90 ± 2.45 | 8.10 ± 2.42 |
| Control | 11.16 ± 2.59 | 11.15 ± 2.66 |
M: mean, SD: standard deviation, TSR teacher–student relationship, PI positive intervention
N = 49
Main and interaction effects comparison of the BDI-II and IT-SR measure between the two groups
| Main effect | Interaction effect | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Within-group | Between-group | ||||||||
| Depression | 25.43 | 0.001 | 0.37 | 9.54 | 0.005 | 0.11 | 12.22 | 0.001 | 0.15 |
| Communication | 11.95 | 0.007 | 0.14 | 8.56 | 0.001 | 0.10 | 14.53 | 0.001 | 0.17 |
| Trust | 15.44 | 0.001 | 0.18 | 8.10 | 0.001 | 0.11 | 12.47 | 0.001 | 0.14 |
| Alienation | 10.94 | 0.030 | 0.12 | 8.03 | 0.001 | 0.12 | 10.60 | 0.012 | 0.11 |
F and p values refer to repeated-measures MANOVA comparing groups, d = Cohen’s effect size