| Literature DB >> 32518198 |
Jianing Wang1, Jingjing Wang1, Zheng Zhang1, Zhifeng Li1, Zhiguo Zhang2, Decun Zhao3, Lidong Wang3, Feng Lu3, Yue-Zhong Li4.
Abstract
Vegetation represents probably the most crucial step for the ecosystem functions of wetlands, but it is unclear how microbial populations and functions shift along with vegetation. In this study, we found that the richness and diversity of sclass="Chemical">oil bacteria iclass="Chemical">ncreased with vegetatioclass="Chemical">n levels aclass="Chemical">nd that the commuclass="Chemical">nity compositioclass="Chemical">n was disticlass="Chemical">nctly shifted from bare to vegetative places. The bare laclass="Chemical">nd displayed aclass="Chemical">n extremely high abuclass="Chemical">ndaclass="Chemical">nce of Cyaclass="Chemical">nobacteria as a moclass="Chemical">nospecies geclass="Chemical">nus, while a Gemmatimoclass="Chemical">nadetes geclass="Chemical">nus was predomiclass="Chemical">naclass="Chemical">nt as multiple species iclass="Chemical">n all the vegetative wetlaclass="Chemical">nds, suggesticlass="Chemical">ng their importaclass="Chemical">nt ecosystem fuclass="Chemical">nctioclass="Chemical">ns aclass="Chemical">nd poteclass="Chemical">ntial mechaclass="Chemical">nisms. Expressioclass="Chemical">n of the geclass="Chemical">nes related to photosyclass="Chemical">nthesis was eclass="Chemical">nriched exclusively iclass="Chemical">n bare laclass="Chemical">nd. Geclass="Chemical">nes iclass="Chemical">nvolved iclass="Chemical">n biological orgaclass="Chemical">nicEntities:
Keywords: Cyanobacteriazzm321990; Gemmatimonadeteszzm321990; Yellow River Delta; carbon cycling; estuarine coastal wetland; omics analyses; soil bacterial composition
Year: 2020 PMID: 32518198 PMCID: PMC7289592 DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00412-20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mSystems ISSN: 2379-5077 Impact factor: 6.496
FIG 1Biogeography characteristics of the bacterial communities in bare and vegetative wetlands of the Yellow River Delta. (a) The geographical sampling locations. Plot A is bare land near the ocean at a distance of ∼2.1 km; plots B and C (at a distance of 2.2 km; the distance between plots A and B is 1.8 km) have sparse Suaeda salsa; plot D (0.7-km distance from plot C) is densely grown with Suaeda salsa; and plot E (1.2-km distance from plot D), which is the sampling site farthest from the ocean, is a grassland of Phragmites communis reeds. Three samples at each plot were collected from different places within a distance of approximately 3 to 5 m (the geographical information and the geomorphology refer to Fig. S1a). Background image was acquired freely from http://www.gscloud.cn/. (b) OTU (97% similarity) numbers in the five plots. (c) Hierarchical clustering tree based on the Bray-Curtis metric at the OTU level. (d) PCoA of OTUs with weighted UniFrac distances. The PERMANOVA data are as follows: for plot A versus plots B/C, F = 12.94, P = 0.014; for plot A versus plots D/E, F = 10.93, P = 0.013; for plots B/C versus plots D/E, F = 7.00, P = 0.003.
FIG 2Bacterial community compositions and their responses to environmental factors in wetlands along the vegetation transition zones in the Yellow River Delta. (a) Bacterial community compositions at the phylum level (“others” = <0.05) of the five plots. (b) Pearson correlation heat map of environmental factors and the relative abundances of the 20 most abundant bacterial phyla in wetland soil samples (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001). (c) Top 10 predominant bacterial genera in five plots. (d) Relative abundances of the 15 most abundant OTUs of g__norank_c__Gemmatimonadetes in the five plots.
FIG 3Omics analyses of bacterial functions in bare and vegetative wetlands. (a) Relative abundances of microorganisms (bacteria, archaea, eukaryotes, and viruses) in plots A and C based on metagenomic sequencing. (b) The relative abundances of metabolic pathways of plots A and C at KEGG level 3 based on metatranscriptomic sequencing. Each asterisk (*) indicates a fold change value of >2. (c) Volcano plots of the metatranscriptomics-identified genes associated with the main metabolic pathways in plots A and C. (d) Volcano plots of the metatranscriptomics-identified genes associated with the cycling of elements in plots A and C. (e) A phylogenomic tree of MAGs and cultured genomes of the phylum Gemmatimonadetes. (f) Expression patterns of the genes from ydcontigbins.4 in the metatranscriptome. (g) Heat map of the 28 differentially enriched metabolites in the samples of plots A and C using Z-scores [Z = (X − average)/standard deviation].
FIG 4Visualization of proteins identified in both ydcontigbins.4 and metatranscriptomic results and metabolites identified from metabolomics results. TCA cycle components are as follows: SucA, 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase E1 component; SucB, 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase E2 component; AcnA, aconitate hydratase; PckA, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase; PdhD, dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase; PdhB, pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component beta subunit. Purine metabolism components are as follows: PurA, adenylosuccinate synthase; PurD; phosphoribosylamine-glycine ligase; PurF, amidophosphoribosyltransferase; PunA, purine-nucleoside phosphorylase; Pmm-Pgm, phosphomannomutase-phosphoglucomutase; Ndk, nucleoside-diphosphate kinase; YagS, xanthine dehydrogenase YagS FAD-binding subunit. Nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolism components are as follows: PunA, purine-nucleoside phosphorylase; GabD, succinate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase/glutarate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase. Pyruvate metabolism components are as follows: Acs, acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA) synthetase; PflD, formate C-acetyltransferase P; PckA, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (ATP); Pps, pyruvate, water dikinase; Pyk, pyruvate kinase; AccC, acetyl-CoA carboxylase, biotin carboxylase subunit; AccD, acetyl-CoA carboxylase carboxyl transferase subunit beta. Type IV pilus components are as follows: PilM, type IV pilus assembly protein PilM; PilB, type IV pilus assembly protein PilB. The type VI secretion system component is as follows: VasG, type VI secretion system protein VasG. Two-component system components are as follows: PhoR, two-component system, OmpR family, phosphate regulon sensor histidine kinase; PhoB, two-component system, OmpR family, alkaline phosphatase synthesis response regulator. Other details are listed in Table S5.