| Literature DB >> 32516984 |
Saleh Zidan1,2, Nikolaos Silikas1, Julfikar Haider3, Abdulaziz Alhotan1, Javad Jahantigh1, Julian Yates1.
Abstract
High-impact (HI) polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), obtained from modification of conventional PMMA, is commonly used in prosthodontics as a denture base material for improved impact resistance. However, it suffers from poor flexural strength properties. The aim of this study was to investigate the flexural strength of complete removable dentures made of HI heat-polymerised PMMA resin reinforced with zirconia nanoparticles at two different concentrations. The effect of fatigue loading on the flexural strength behaviour of the dentures was also investigated. A total of 30 denture specimens were fabricated from PMMA with different concentrations of zirconia nanoparticles: 0 (control), 3, and 5 wt.%. Ten specimens in each group were divided into two subgroups, with five specimens in each, to conduct both flexural strength and fatigue loading test of each of the subgroups. Fatigue loading was applied on the dentures using a mastication simulator and equivalent flexural strength was calculated with data from bending tests with and without fatigue cyclic loading. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the test data was conducted with the Bonferroni significant difference post-hoc test at a preset alpha value of 0.05. Paired t-test was employed to identify any difference between the specimens with and without the application of fatigue loading. The fractured surface of the denture specimens was examined with a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The bending tests demonstrated that the mean equivalent flexural strength of reinforced HI PMMA denture specimens with 5 wt.% zirconia nanoparticles increased significantly (134.9 ± 13.9 MPa) compared to the control group (0 wt.%) (106.3 ± 21.3 MPa) without any fatigue loading. The mean strength of the dentures with PMMA +3 wt.% zirconia also increased, but not significantly. Although the mean strength of all specimen groups subjected to fatigue loading slightly decreased compared to that of the specimen groups without any fatigue cyclic loading, this was not statistically significant. Denture specimens made of HI heat-polymerised PMMA reinforced with 5 wt.% zirconia nanoparticles had significantly improved equivalent flexural strength compared to that made of pure PMMA when the specimens were not subjected to any prior fatigue cyclic loading. In addition, the application of fatigue cyclic loading did not significantly improve the equivalent flexural strengths of all denture specimen groups. Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the use of zirconia-impregnated PMMA in the manufacture of dentures does not result in any significant improvement for clinical application.Entities:
Keywords: denture base; fatigue loading; flexural strength; high-impact PMMA; zirconia (ZrO2), nanocomposite
Year: 2020 PMID: 32516984 PMCID: PMC7321581 DOI: 10.3390/ma13112580
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Materials used in making complete removable dentures.
| Materials | Trade Name | Manufacturer | Lot. Number |
|---|---|---|---|
| High-impact heat-curing acrylic denture base resin | HI Metrocryl | Metrodent Limited, Huddersfield, UK | Powder (22828) |
| Yttria-stabilised zirconium oxide | Zirconium oxide | Sky Spring Nano Materials, Inc., Houston, TX, USA | 8522–120315 |
| Dental plaster | Flasking plaster | Saint-Gobain, Formula, Newark, UK | 0411217–3 |
| High-strength dental stone | Dentstone KD | Saint-Gobain, Formula, Newark, UK | 085217–5 |
| Type 4 diestone | Metrostone | Metrodent Limited, Huddersfield, UK | 032218–1 |
| Addition cure silicone putty 1:1 | Sheraduplica | Shera, Lemforde, Huddersfield, UK | Base (86392) Catalyst (86047) |
| 3-Trimethoxysilyl propyl methacrylate | Silane coupling agent | Sigma Aldrich, Gillingham, UK | 440159 |
Weight percent zirconia in combination with acrylic resin powder as well as monomer content of the specimen groups.
| Experimental Groups | Zirconia | Zirconia | HI PMMA | HI MMA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.0 | 0.000 | 21.000 | 10.0 |
| Nanocomposite-1 | 3.0 | 0.630 | 20.370 | 10.0 |
| Nanocomposite-2 | 5.0 | 1.050 | 19.950 | 10.0 |
Figure 1(A) Test setup for mastication simulation under fatigue cyclic loading and (B) schematic diagram of mastication fatigue loading.
Figure 2(A) Applying bending load on palatal surface of denture specimen in Hounsfield universal testing machine and (B) schematic diagram of loading conditions.
Weight of complete dentures made of pure polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and zirconia-impregnated PMMA.
| Weight of Non-Reinforced PMMA Dentures (g) (Mean ± SD) | Weight of Reinforced PMMA Dentures (g) (Mean ± SD) | |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group 0 wt.% of zirconia | 3 wt.% of zirconia | 5 wt.% of zirconia |
| 20.1 ± 1.0 | 19.5 ± 0.2 | 19.5 ± 1.0 |
Figure 3Typical bending load vs. deflection curves without fatigue cyclic loading for pure high impact (HI)-PMMA and zirconia-reinforced nanocomposites.
Maximum force (N) and mean and SD of values the equivalent flexural strength (MPa) before and after fatigue cyclic loading for the test groups.
| Without Fatigue Cyclic Loading | With Fatigue Cyclic Loading | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight Percent Zirconia | Maximum Force (N) | Equivalent Flexural Strength (MPa) and SD | Maximum Force (N) | Equivalent Flexural Strength (MPa) and SD |
| Control (0.0 %) | 633.2 | 106.3 (21.3)Aa | 598.9 | 100.6 (17.4)Aa |
| 3.0 % | 757.0 | 127.1 (5.8)Ab | 643.8 | 108.1 (15.2)Ab |
| 5.0 % | 803.6 | 134.9 (13.9)Bc | 662.2 | 111.2 (15.45)Ac |
Note: Within a column, cells having similar (upper case) letters are not significantly different from the control group (0% zirconia content) and within a row values identified using the same lower-case letters are not significantly different; n = 5 specimens per group.
Failure modes of complete dentures with and without fatigue cyclic loading.
| Failure Mode | Name of Failure Modes | Control Group | 3 wt.% Zirconia | 5 wt.% Zirconia | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without Fatigue Loading | With Fatigue Loading | Without Fatigue Loading | With Fatigue Loading | Without Fatigue Loading | With Fatigue Loading | ||
| Complete fracture | Midline fracture | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| Between central and lateral | - | One between central and lateral. One between centrals | One between canine and first premolar. | Two between centrals. One through a central | One between centrals. | ||
| Incomplete fracture | Localised fracture | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cracks | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | |
Figure 4Failure modes observed in the dentures during the bending tests: midline fracture, localised fracture, and crack.
Figure 5Fractured surfaces of denture specimens with fatigue cyclic loading during bending tests at different magnifications.
Figure 6Fractured surfaces of dentures with fatigue cyclic loading during bending tests showing surface characteristics at 25,000×. Arrows indicate voids and circles indicate voids filled by zirconia particles.