STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Fractures of overdentures occur in the denture base through the abutments. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of reinforcements and the space available for their placement on the dynamic and static loading capacity of a simulated implant-supported overdenture model. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Rhomboidal (6 × 6 × 25 mm) test specimens (n=8), made with an acrylic resin and containing 2 metal O-ring capsules, were reinforced with braided stainless steel bar (BS), stainless steel mesh (SM), unidirectional E-glass fiber (GF), E-glass mesh (GM), woven polyethylene braids (PE), or polyaramid fibers (PA). Two distinct spaces for reinforcement placement were investigated: a 2.5 mm and a 1 mm space. Control groups consisted of nonreinforced specimens. Specimens were thermocycled (5°C and 55°C, 5,000 cycles) and then subjected to a 100,000 cyclic load regime. Unbroken specimens were then loaded until failure. The number of failures under fatigue (f) and static load (s) were compared with the Chi-Square test, while static load means were compared with the Kruskal-Wallis test (α=.05). RESULTS: The number of failures (f:s) of GF (0:16), PE (0:16), and PA (0:16) differed significantly from the control group (8:8) and SM (4:12) (P=.037 and P=.025, respectively). For the 2.5 mm space group, these same reinforcements also exhibited higher static load means than the control (P=.016, P=.003, and P=.003, respectively); under static load, no significant differences were detected between the reinforced groups and the control for the 1.0 mm space group (P=1.0). CONCLUSIONS: E-glass fibers, woven polyethylene braids, and polyaramid fibers withstood the fatigue regime and increased the flexural strength of the implant-supported overdenture model. The spaces available for reinforcement did not affect the dynamic strength or the static loading capacity of the implant-supported overdenture model.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Fractures of overdentures occur in the denture base through the abutments. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of reinforcements and the space available for their placement on the dynamic and static loading capacity of a simulated implant-supported overdenture model. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Rhomboidal (6 × 6 × 25 mm) test specimens (n=8), made with an acrylic resin and containing 2 metal O-ring capsules, were reinforced with braided stainless steel bar (BS), stainless steel mesh (SM), unidirectional E-glass fiber (GF), E-glass mesh (GM), woven polyethylene braids (PE), or polyaramid fibers (PA). Two distinct spaces for reinforcement placement were investigated: a 2.5 mm and a 1 mm space. Control groups consisted of nonreinforced specimens. Specimens were thermocycled (5°C and 55°C, 5,000 cycles) and then subjected to a 100,000 cyclic load regime. Unbroken specimens were then loaded until failure. The number of failures under fatigue (f) and static load (s) were compared with the Chi-Square test, while static load means were compared with the Kruskal-Wallis test (α=.05). RESULTS: The number of failures (f:s) of GF (0:16), PE (0:16), and PA (0:16) differed significantly from the control group (8:8) and SM (4:12) (P=.037 and P=.025, respectively). For the 2.5 mm space group, these same reinforcements also exhibited higher static load means than the control (P=.016, P=.003, and P=.003, respectively); under static load, no significant differences were detected between the reinforced groups and the control for the 1.0 mm space group (P=1.0). CONCLUSIONS: E-glass fibers, woven polyethylene braids, and polyaramid fibers withstood the fatigue regime and increased the flexural strength of the implant-supported overdenture model. The spaces available for reinforcement did not affect the dynamic strength or the static loading capacity of the implant-supported overdenture model.