| Literature DB >> 32514616 |
Eleonora Cinelli1, Gabriella Fabbrocini2, Davide Fattore2, Claudio Marasca2, Giovanni Damiani3,4, Maria Carmela Annunziata2.
Abstract
Stringent measures have been taken to contain COVID-19 spread, limiting access only for urgent visits, surgery procedures, or hospitalizations and using teledermatology services for non-urgent cases. Management of oncological patients affected by chemo-, immune-, and radiotherapy-related cutaneous and mucosal adverse events is a challenge. Firstly because of the differential diagnosis of cutaneous rash (e.g., drug-related rash or paraviral exanthema). Secondly, oncological patients can suffer from xerosis, pruritus, and mucositis that contribute to cutaneous and mucosal barrier lesions, thus becoming vulnerable site for viral or bacterial colonization. These lesions can also be aggravated by the use of protective mask and gloves. Here, we report also our results of a teledermatological survey on 87 oncological patients, where the health status of oncological patients referred to our dedicated clinic was assessed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, it is fundamental that oncological patients are followed up by their dermatologists even if the clinics are closed. Teledermatology represents a crucial means of communication. Patients can contact the dermatological staff by emails and telephone, 24 h a day, 7 days a week, for video calls and dermatological consultations.Entities:
Keywords: Adverse events; COVID-19; Skin; Teledermatology
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32514616 PMCID: PMC7276658 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05563-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Support Care Cancer ISSN: 0941-4355 Impact factor: 3.603
Teledermatology survey: study population data
| Patients, | |
|---|---|
| Patients contacted by telephone or video call | 35 |
| • Patients with worsening condition who required a shift or an increased dose of therapy* | 8 |
| • Patients with stable condition | 12 |
| • Patients with improving condition | 8 |
| • Patients in good health, only on preventive follow-up | 7 |
| Patients contacted by email | 52 |
| • Patients with worsening condition who required a shift or an increased dose of therapy | 6 |
| • Patients with stable condition | 21 |
| • Patients with improving condition | 12 |
| • Patients in good health, only on preventive follow-up | 13 |
| Patients who did not answer to both means of communications | 18 |
*Topical and/or systemic therapy prescribed for chemotherapy- or immunotherapy-related adverse events in the previous visit