Literature DB >> 30851259

Midterm Outcomes of Bridge-to-Recovery Patients After Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support.

Yi-Tso Cheng1, Arthur R Garan2, Joseph Sanchez3, Paul Kurlansky3, Masahiko Ando3, Marisa Cevasco3, Melana Yuzefpolskaya2, Paolo C Colombo2, Yoshifumi Naka3, Hiroo Takayama3, Koji Takeda4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of short-term mechanical circulatory support (ST-MCS) has increased for refractory cardiogenic shock. However, there are scant data about bridge-to-recovery patients.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 502 patients with cardiogenic shock who received venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or a temporary surgical ventricular assist device as ST-MCS between 2010 and 2016. There were 178 patients (35.5%) who survived through device explantation. Of these, 149 patients (29.7%) survived to discharge and were included for analysis. The primary outcome was midterm survival without undergoing heart replacement therapy.
RESULTS: In our bridge-to-recovery cohort, 101 patients (67.8%) were men, and the median age was 59 years (interquartile range, 51 to 67 years). Etiology of cardiogenic shock included postcardiotomy shock in 35.6% of patients (n = 53), allograft failure in 26.8% (n = 40), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in 24.2% (n = 36), and other acute decompensated heart failure in 14.4% (n = 20). There were 24 major events (16.1%) recorded, including 21 patients who died and 3 patients who received heart replacement therapy during median follow-up of 306 days (interquartile range, 58.25 to 916.75 days). Overall freedom from event at 3 years was 74.2%. In subgroup analysis, AMI patients had a significantly worse freedom-from-event rate at 40.4% (p < 0.001). By univariate Cox analysis, AMI etiology (p = 0.003), length of ST-MCS (p = 0.06), blood urea nitrogen (p = 0.012), and left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.005) at discharge were predictors for adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: The overall midterm outcome of patients explanted from ST-MCS is favorable except for AMI patients.
Copyright © 2019 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30851259     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.01.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  5 in total

1.  Recovery With Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support While Waitlisted for Heart Transplantation.

Authors:  Veli K Topkara; Gabriel T Sayer; Kevin J Clerkin; Omar Wever-Pinzon; Koji Takeda; Hiroo Takayama; Craig H Selzman; Yoshifumi Naka; Daniel Burkhoff; Josef Stehlik; Maryjane A Farr; James C Fang; Nir Uriel; Stavros G Drakos
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  When NOT to use short-term mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Vivek Rao; Fillio Billia
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2020-08-09

3.  Proposal for a trial of early left ventricular venting during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Michael Ibrahim; Michael A Acker; Wilson Szeto; Jacob Gutsche; Matthew Williams; Pavan Atluri; Matthew Woods; Thomas Richards; Timothy J Gardner; Jeremy McGarvey; Mark Epler; Joyce Wald; Eduardo Rame; Edo Birati; Christian Bermudez
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2021-07-30

4.  Commentary: Futility in the age of modern mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Alexander Schutz; Ravi Ghanta
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2020-06-29

5.  How I approach weaning from venoarterial ECMO.

Authors:  Justin A Fried; Amirali Masoumi; Koji Takeda; Daniel Brodie
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 9.097

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.