Literature DB >> 32511668

Association of Low-Value Testing With Subsequent Health Care Use and Clinical Outcomes Among Low-risk Primary Care Outpatients Undergoing an Annual Health Examination.

Zachary Bouck1,2, Andrew J Calzavara3, Noah M Ivers1,3,4, Eve A Kerr5,6,7, Cherry Chu1, Jacob Ferguson8, Danielle Martin1, Joshua Tepper2, Peter C Austin3,4, Peter Cram9,10, Wendy Levinson9, R Sacha Bhatia1,3,4.   

Abstract

Importance: The association of low-value testing with downstream care and clinical outcomes among primary care outpatients is unknown to date. Objective: To assess the association of low-value testing with subsequent care among low-risk primary care outpatients undergoing an annual health examination (AHE). Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based retrospective cohort study used administrative health care claims from Ontario, Canada, for primary care outpatients undergoing an AHE between April 1, 2012, and March 31, 2016, to identify individuals who could be placed into one (or more) of the following 3 cohorts: adult patients (18 years or older) at low risk for cardiovascular and pulmonary disease, adult patients at low risk for cardiovascular disease, and female patients (aged 13-20 years or older than 69 years) at low risk for cervical cancer. The dates of analysis were June 3 to September 12, 2019. Exposures: Low-value screening tests were defined per cohort as (1) a chest radiograph within 7 days, (2) an electrocardiogram (ECG) within 30 days, or (3) a Papanicolaou test within 7 days after an AHE. Main Outcomes and Measures: Subsequent specialist visits, diagnostic tests, and procedures within 90 days after a low-value test (if the patient had a chest radiograph, ECG, or Papanicolaou test) or end of the exposure observation window (if not tested).
Results: Included in the chest radiograph, ECG, and Papanicolaou test cohorts of propensity score-matched pairs were 43 532 patients (mean [SD] age, 47.5 [14.4] years; 38.5% female), 245 686 patients (mean [SD] age, 49.9 [13.7] years; 51.1% female), and 29 194 patients (mean [SD] age, 45.5 [27.1] years; 100% female), respectively. At 90 days, chest radiographs in low-risk patients were associated with an additional 0.87 (95% CI, 0.69-1.05) and 1.96 (95% CI, 1.71-2.22) patients having an outpatient pulmonology visit or an abdominal or thoracic computed tomography scan per 100 patients, respectively, and ECGs in low-risk patients were associated with an additional 1.92 (95% CI, 1.82-2.02), 5.49 (95% CI, 5.33-5.65), and 4.46 (95% CI, 4.31-4.61) patients having an outpatient cardiologist visit, a transthoracic echocardiogram, or a cardiac stress test per 100 patients, respectively. At 180 days, Papanicolaou testing in low-risk patients was associated with an additional 1.31 (95% CI, 0.84-1.78), 52.8 (95% CI, 51.9-53.6), and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.66-1.01) patients having an outpatient gynecology visit, a follow-up Papanicolaou test, or colposcopy per 100 patients, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Observed associations in this population-based cohort study suggest that testing in low-risk patients as part of an AHE increases the likelihood of subsequent specialist visits, diagnostic tests, and procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32511668      PMCID: PMC7281357          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  17 in total

1.  Frequency of and variation in low-value care in primary care: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ciara Pendrith; Meghan Bhatia; Noah M Ivers; Graham Mecredy; Karen Tu; Gillian A Hawker; Susan B Jaglal; Lynn Wilson; Kimberly Wintemute; Richard H Glazier; Wendy Levinson; R Sacha Bhatia
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2017-01-20

2.  Routine chest radiography in a primary care setting.

Authors:  Stefan Tigges; David L Roberts; Kay H Vydareny; David A Schulman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Trends in the overuse of ambulatory health care services in the United States.

Authors:  Minal S Kale; Tara F Bishop; Alex D Federman; Salomeh Keyhani
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Benchmarking physician performance: reliability of individual and composite measures.

Authors:  Sarah Hudson Scholle; Joachim Roski; John L Adams; Daniel L Dunn; Eve A Kerr; Donna Pillittere Dugan; Roxanne E Jensen
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Prevalence of Potentially Unnecessary Bimanual Pelvic Examinations and Papanicolaou Tests Among Adolescent Girls and Young Women Aged 15-20 Years in the United States.

Authors:  Jin Qin; Mona Saraiya; Gladys Martinez; George F Sawaya
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.894

7.  Calculating unreported confidence intervals for paired data.

Authors:  Karim F Hirji; Morten W Fagerland
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Cascades of Care After Incidental Findings in a US National Survey of Physicians.

Authors:  Ishani Ganguli; Arabella L Simpkin; Claire Lupo; Arlene Weissman; Alexander J Mainor; E John Orav; Meredith B Rosenthal; Carrie H Colla; Thomas D Sequist
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-10-02

9.  Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Physician Characteristics Associated With Ordering 4 Low-Value Screening Tests in Primary Care.

Authors:  Zachary Bouck; Jacob Ferguson; Noah M Ivers; Eve A Kerr; Kaveh G Shojania; Min Kim; Peter Cram; Ciara Pendrith; Graham C Mecredy; Richard H Glazier; Joshua Tepper; Peter C Austin; Danielle Martin; Wendy Levinson; R Sacha Bhatia
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-10-05
View more
  12 in total

1.  Rethinking screening during and after COVID-19: Should things ever be the same again?

Authors:  James A Dickinson; Guylène Thériault; Harminder Singh; Olga Szafran; Roland Grad
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Is Low-value Testing Before Low-risk Hand Surgery Associated With Increased Downstream Healthcare Use and Reimbursements? A National Claims Database Analysis.

Authors:  Jessica M Welch; Thompson Zhuang; Lauren M Shapiro; Alex H S Harris; Laurence C Baker; Robin N Kamal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Adverse Events and Hospital-Acquired Conditions Associated With Potential Low-Value Care in Medicare Beneficiaries.

Authors:  Kelsey Chalmers; Valérie Gopinath; Shannon Brownlee; Vikas Saini; Adam G Elshaug
Journal:  JAMA Health Forum       Date:  2021-07-23

4.  Electronic Delivery of Pain Education for Chronic Overlapping Pain Conditions: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Lindsey C McKernan; Leslie J Crofford; Ahra Kim; Simon N Vandekar; William S Reynolds; Kathryn A Hansen; Daniel J Clauw; David A Williams
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 3.750

5.  General practitioner gender and use of diagnostic procedures: a French cross-sectional study in training practices.

Authors:  Amandine Bouissiere; Marine Laperrouse; Henri Panjo; Virginie Ringa; Laurent Rigal; Laurent Letrilliart
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 3.006

6.  Patient Provider Continuity and Prostate Specific Antigen Testing: Impact of Continuity on Receipt of a Non-recommended Test.

Authors:  Arch G Mainous; Benjamin J Rooks; Elvira S Mercado; Peter J Carek
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-03-19

7.  Does de-implementation of low-value care impact the patient-clinician relationship? A mixed methods study.

Authors:  Michelle S Rockwell; Kenan C Michaels; John W Epling
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  A qualitative interview study of Australian physicians on defensive practice and low value care: "it's easier to talk about our fear of lawyers than to talk about our fear of looking bad in front of each other".

Authors:  Nola M Ries; Briony Johnston; Jesse Jansen
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Downstream activities after laboratory testing in primary care: an exploratory outcome of the ELMO cluster randomised trial (Electronic Laboratory Medicine Ordering with evidence-based order sets in primary care).

Authors:  Veerle Piessens; Nicolas Delvaux; Stefan Heytens; Bert Aertgeerts; An De Sutter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  Why clinicians overtest: development of a thematic framework.

Authors:  Justin H Lam; Kristen Pickles; Fiona F Stanaway; Katy J L Bell
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.