Literature DB >> 28401118

Frequency of and variation in low-value care in primary care: a retrospective cohort study.

Ciara Pendrith1, Meghan Bhatia1, Noah M Ivers1, Graham Mecredy1, Karen Tu1, Gillian A Hawker1, Susan B Jaglal1, Lynn Wilson1, Kimberly Wintemute1, Richard H Glazier1, Wendy Levinson1, R Sacha Bhatia1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low-value care, defined as care with a lack of benefit, can lead to higher health care costs, inconvenience to patients and, in some cases, harm to patients. The objectives of this study are to conduct exploratory analyses to understand how frequently selected low-value tests are ordered, to assess the degree of variation in ordering that exists across regions and practices, and to identify services that may warrant further investigation and targeted interventions.
METHODS: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study using administrative health care databases from Ontario to identify rates of use of the following low-value services between fiscal years 2008/09 and 2012/13: computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after a diagnosis of low back pain, Papanicolaou testing in women less than 21 years of age or older than 69 years of age and repeated dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scanning within 2 years of an index scan. Regional and practice-level rates were calculated. Bivariate analyses were conducted to explore associations between patient factors and repeat DEXA scans.
RESULTS: Repeated DEXA scans were the most common service (21.0%), whereas cervical cancer screening among women less than 21 years of age or older than 69 years of age (8.0%) and CT or MRI imaging for low back pain (4.5%) were less common. There was substantial variation across practices with rates of repeated DEXA scans, ranging from 4.0% to 54.9%, and cervical cancer screening, ranging from 0.9% to 35.2%. Patients with a high-risk index DEXA were more likely to receive a repeat scan (28.1%) than those with a baseline (8.9%) or low-risk (8.1%) scan.
INTERPRETATION: There is significant, practice-level variation in the frequency of low-value testing for DEXA scans, back imaging and cervical cancer screening. There is a particular need for interventions that aim to reduce unnecessary DEXA scans.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28401118      PMCID: PMC5378544          DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20160095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ Open        ISSN: 2291-0026


  18 in total

1.  Medscape's response to the Institute of Medicine Report: Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.

Authors:  M Leavitt
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2001-03-05

2.  Geography and the debate over Medicare reform.

Authors:  John E Wennberg; Elliott S Fisher; Jonathan S Skinner
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2002 Jul-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 3.  Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rainu Kaushal; Kaveh G Shojania; David W Bates
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-06-23

4.  Engaging physicians and patients in conversations about unnecessary tests and procedures: Choosing Wisely Canada.

Authors:  Wendy Levinson; Tai Huynh
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Cervical screening: a guideline for clinical practice in Ontario.

Authors:  Joan Murphy; Erin B Kennedy; Sheila Dunn; C Meg McLachlin; Michael Fung Kee Fung; Danusia Gzik; Michael Shier; Lawrence Paszat
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2012-05

6.  Determining the need for hip and knee arthroplasty: the role of clinical severity and patients' preferences.

Authors:  G A Hawker; J G Wright; P C Coyte; J I Williams; B Harvey; R Glazier; A Wilkins; E M Badley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Low rates of cervical cancer screening among urban immigrants: a population-based study in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Aisha K Lofters; Rahim Moineddin; Stephen W Hwang; Richard H Glazier
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Patterns of use of the bone mineral density test in Ontario, 1992-1998.

Authors:  S B Jaglal; W J McIsaac; G Hawker; L Jaakkimainen; S M Cadarette; B T Chan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-10-31       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Measuring low-value care in Medicare.

Authors:  Aaron L Schwartz; Bruce E Landon; Adam G Elshaug; Michael E Chernew; J Michael McWilliams
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Engaging physicians and consumers in conversations about treatment overuse and waste: a short history of the choosing wisely campaign.

Authors:  Daniel Wolfson; John Santa; Lorie Slass
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 6.893

View more
  16 in total

1. 

Authors:  Kimberly Wintemute; Lynn Wilson; Wendy Levinson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Choosing Wisely in primary care: Moving from recommendations to implementation.

Authors:  Kimberly Wintemute; Lynn Wilson; Wendy Levinson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Electrocardiograms in Low-Risk Patients Undergoing an Annual Health Examination.

Authors:  R Sacha Bhatia; Zachary Bouck; Noah M Ivers; Graham Mecredy; Jasjit Singh; Ciara Pendrith; Dennis T Ko; Danielle Martin; Harindra C Wijeysundera; Jack V Tu; Lynn Wilson; Kimberly Wintemute; Paul Dorian; Joshua Tepper; Peter C Austin; Richard H Glazier; Wendy Levinson
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Clinician-Level Variation in Three Measures Representing Overuse Based on the American Geriatrics Society Choosing Wisely Statement.

Authors:  Theresa A Rowe; Tiffany Brown; Ji Young Lee; Jeffrey A Linder; Mark W Friedberg; Jason N Doctor; Daniella Meeker; Jody D Ciolino; Stephen D Persell
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Identifying drivers of health care value: a scoping review of the literature.

Authors:  Susan N Landon; Jane Padikkala; Leora I Horwitz
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 2.908

6.  Association of Low-Value Testing With Subsequent Health Care Use and Clinical Outcomes Among Low-risk Primary Care Outpatients Undergoing an Annual Health Examination.

Authors:  Zachary Bouck; Andrew J Calzavara; Noah M Ivers; Eve A Kerr; Cherry Chu; Jacob Ferguson; Danielle Martin; Joshua Tepper; Peter C Austin; Peter Cram; Wendy Levinson; R Sacha Bhatia
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  Frequency and Associations of Prescription Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug Use Among Patients With a Musculoskeletal Disorder and Hypertension, Heart Failure, or Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Zachary Bouck; Graham C Mecredy; Noah M Ivers; Moumita Barua; Danielle Martin; Peter C Austin; Joshua Tepper; R Sacha Bhatia
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  Routine use of chest x-ray for low-risk patients undergoing a periodic health examination: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Zachary Bouck; Graham Mecredy; Noah M Ivers; Ciara Pendrith; Ben Fine; Danielle Martin; Richard H Glazier; Joshua Tepper; Wendy Levinson; R Sacha Bhatia
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2018-08-13

9.  Moving low value care lists into action: prioritizing candidate health technologies for reassessment using administrative data.

Authors:  Lesley J J Soril; Brayan V Seixas; Craig Mitton; Stirling Bryan; Fiona M Clement
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  An Association Between Cardiologist Billing Patterns, Health Care Use, and Outcomes in Cardiac Patients.

Authors:  Rajan Sacha Bhatia; Dennis T Ko; Cherry Chu; Ruth Croxford; Zachary Bouck; Tharmegan Tharmaratnam; Paul Dorian; Heather Ross; Peter C Austin; Kaveh Shojania; Shaun G Goodman
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2021-02-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.