Literature DB >> 31904768

Prevalence of Potentially Unnecessary Bimanual Pelvic Examinations and Papanicolaou Tests Among Adolescent Girls and Young Women Aged 15-20 Years in the United States.

Jin Qin1, Mona Saraiya1, Gladys Martinez2, George F Sawaya3,4.   

Abstract

Importance: Pelvic examination is no longer recommended for asymptomatic, nonpregnant women and may cause harms such as false-positive test results, overdiagnosis, anxiety, and unnecessary costs. The bimanual pelvic examination (BPE) is an invasive and controversial examination component. Cervical cancer screening is not recommended for women younger than 21 years.
Objectives: To estimate prevalence of potentially unnecessary BPE and Papanicolaou (Pap) tests performed among adolescent girls and women younger than 21 years (hereinafter referred to as young women) in the United States and to identify factors associated with receiving these examinations. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional analysis of the National Survey of Family Growth from September 2011 through September 2017 focused on a population-based sample of young women aged 15 to 20 years (n = 3410). The analysis used survey weights to estimate prevalence and the number of people represented in the US population. Data were analyzed from December 21, 2018, through September 3, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: Receipt of a BPE or a Pap test in the last 12 months and the proportion of potentially unnecessary examinations and tests.
Results: Responses from 3410 young women aged 15 to 20 years were included in the analysis with 6-year sampling weights applied. Among US young women aged 15 to 20 years represented during the 2011-2017 study period, 4.8% (95% CI, 3.9%-5.9%) were pregnant, 22.3% (95% CI, 20.1%-24.6%) had undergone STI testing, and 4.5% (95% CI, 3.6%-5.5%) received treatment or medication for an STI in the past 12 months (Table 1). Only 2.0% (95% CI, 1.4%-2.9%) reported using an IUD, and 33.5% (95% CI, 30.8%-36.4%) used at least 1 other type of hormonal contraception in the past 12 months. Among US young women aged 15 to 20 years who were surveyed in the years 2011 through 2017, approximately 2.6 million (22.9%; 95% CI, 20.7%-25.3%) reported having received a BPE in the last 12 months. Approximately half of these examinations (54.4%; 95% CI, 48.8%-59.9%) were potentially unnecessary, representing an estimated 1.4 million individuals. Receipt of a BPE was associated with having a Pap test (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR], 7.12; 95% CI, 5.56-9.12), testing for sexually transmitted infections (aPR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.34-1.90), and using hormonal contraception other than an intrauterine device (aPR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.11-1.54). In addition, an estimated 2.2 million young women (19.2%; 95% CI, 17.2%-21.4%) reported having received a Pap test in the past 12 months, and 71.9% (95% CI, 66.0%-77.1%) of these tests were potentially unnecessary. Conclusions and Relevance: This analysis found that more than half of BPEs and almost three-quarters of Pap tests performed among young women aged 15 to 20 years during the years 2011 through 2017 were potentially unnecessary, exposing women to preventable harms. The results suggest that compliance with the current professional guidelines regarding the appropriate use of these examinations and tests may be lacking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31904768      PMCID: PMC7028301          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.5727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  7 in total

Review 1.  The changing landscape of cancer in the USA - opportunities for advancing prevention and treatment.

Authors:  Farhad Islami; Rebecca L Siegel; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  De-implementation of cervical cancer screening before age 21.

Authors:  Michelle I Silver; Melissa L Anderson; Elisabeth F Beaber; Jennifer S Haas; Sarah Kobrin; Gaia Pocobelli; Celette Sugg Skinner; Jasmin A Tiro; Aruna Kamineni
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Association of Low-Value Testing With Subsequent Health Care Use and Clinical Outcomes Among Low-risk Primary Care Outpatients Undergoing an Annual Health Examination.

Authors:  Zachary Bouck; Andrew J Calzavara; Noah M Ivers; Eve A Kerr; Cherry Chu; Jacob Ferguson; Danielle Martin; Joshua Tepper; Peter C Austin; Peter Cram; Wendy Levinson; R Sacha Bhatia
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Trends in the use of cervical cancer screening tests in a large medical claims database, United States, 2013-2019.

Authors:  Jin Qin; Shahram Shahangian; Mona Saraiya; Hunter Holt; Maribeth Gagnon; George F Sawaya
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Unindicated cervical cancer screening in adolescent females within a large healthcare system in the United States.

Authors:  Hillary Hosier; Sangini S Sheth; Carlos R Oliveira; Lauren E Perley; Alla Vash-Margita
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Delayed Visits for Contraception Due to Concerns Regarding Pelvic Examination Among Women with History of Intimate Partner Violence.

Authors:  Hunter K Holt; George F Sawaya; Alison M El Ayadi; Jillian T Henderson; Corinne H Rocca; Carolyn L Westhoff; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 6.473

7.  A Pot Ignored Boils On: Sustained Calls for Explicit Consent of Intimate Medical Exams.

Authors:  Lori Bruce
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2020-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.