| Literature DB >> 32508004 |
Sanne M B I Botden1, Guus M Bökkerink2,3, Erik Leijte2, Tim Antonius4, Ivo de Blaauw2.
Abstract
Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) cannulation can be a stressful procedure because a fast cannulation is vital for the patient's survival. Therefore, it is important to train the steps of cannulation outside the clinical setting. A relatively low budget, easy to use model, was developed to train the most important steps of an ECMO cannulation. Following this, it was evaluated by experts and target group participants. They all completed a questionnaire regarding their experience and opinions on the ECMO model on general aspects and the training of the component steps, rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Twenty-one participants completed the questionnaire. The features and steps of the model were rated with a mean of 3.9 on average. The haptics of the landscape scored least, with a mean of 3.6, although the haptics of the vessels scored highest with 4.0. The rating of the component steps showed that only 'opening of the vessels' was scored significantly different between the expertise levels (means experts: 4.0, target group: 3.4, p = 0.032). This low budget model is considered to be a valid tool to train the component steps of the ECMO cannulation, which could reduce the learning curve in the a stressful clinical setting. Level of evidence: II prospective comparative study.Entities:
Keywords: Artificial model; Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation; Simulation; Training
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32508004 PMCID: PMC7666290 DOI: 10.1007/s10047-020-01176-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Artif Organs ISSN: 1434-7229 Impact factor: 1.731
Fig. 1Separate components of the 3D model
Fig. 2ECMO model after assembly
Fig. 3External view of model after assembly, after opening of the artery, with traction sutures
Fig. 4ECMO cannulas inserted in the ECMO model
Fig. 5Close-up view of the cannulas in the simulated vessels
Demographics and clinical experience of the participants in this study
| Demographics | Total group ( | Expert group ( | Target group ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male:female ( | 11:8* | 7:5* | 4:3 |
| Age (mean years, SD)* | 45.3 (10.1) | 48.9 (8.8) | 39.0 (9.7) |
| Profession ( | |||
| Pediatric surgeon | 19 | 14 | 5 |
| Resident | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Clinical experience ( | |||
| ECMO procedures performed | |||
| None | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| < 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 5–10 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| 11–25 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| > 25 | 9 | 9 | 0 |
| ECMO procedures assisted | |||
| None | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| < 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| 5–10 | 4 | 3 | 1 |
| 11–25 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| > 25 | 7 | 7 | 0 |
*Two participants in the experienced group did not state their sexes
The grading of the items, in mean and standard deviation, which is based on a 5-point Likert scale (1: very bad, 3: neutral, 5: very good)
| Opinion of the ECMO model | Total group | Target group | Expert group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visual aspects | 3.8 (0.54) | 3.9 (0.38) | 3.7 (0.61) | 0.519 |
| Haptics of the landscape | 3.6 (0.75) | 3.7 (0.95) | 3.5 (0.65) | 0.605 |
| Haptics of the vessels | 4.0 (0.63) | 4.0 (0.58) | 4.0 (0.68) | 1.000 |
| Step 1: control of the vessels | 3.8 (0.60) | 3.9 (0.69) | 3.8 (0.58) | 0.818 |
| Step 2: opening of the vessels | 3.8 (0.51) | 3.4 (0.54) | 4.0 (0.40) | |
| Step 3: placement of the cannulas | 4.0 (0.78) | 4.0 (0.58) | 4.0 (0.88) | 1.000 |
| Step 4: fixation of the cannulas | 4.0 (0.59) | 4.0 (0.82) | 3.9 (0.48) | 0.836 |
| Step 5: connection of cannulas | 3.8 (0.62) | 3.5 (0.55) | 4.0 (0.60) | 0.105 |
The significant differences between the target and expert group were calculated with the independent t-test