Literature DB >> 32506746

Practical implementation of frailty models in Mendelian risk prediction.

Theodore Huang1,2, Malka Gorfine3, Li Hsu4, Giovanni Parmigiani1,2, Danielle Braun1,2.   

Abstract

There are numerous statistical models used to identify individuals at high risk of cancer due to inherited mutations. Mendelian models predict future risk of cancer by using family history with estimated cancer penetrances (age- and sex-specific risk of cancer given the genotype of the mutations) and mutation prevalences. However, there is often residual risk heterogeneity across families even after accounting for the mutations in the model, due to environmental or unobserved genetic risk factors. We aim to improve Mendelian risk prediction by incorporating a frailty model that contains a family-specific frailty vector, impacting the cancer hazard function, to account for this heterogeneity. We use a discrete uniform population frailty distribution and implement a marginalized approach that averages each family's risk predictions over the family's frailty distribution. We apply the proposed approach to improve breast cancer prediction in BRCAPRO, a Mendelian model that accounts for inherited mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes to predict breast and ovarian cancer. We evaluate the proposed model's performance in simulations and real data from the Cancer Genetics Network and show improvements in model calibration and discrimination. We also discuss alternative approaches for incorporating frailties and their strengths and limitations.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  family history; frailty model; mendelian risk prediction; survival analysis

Year:  2020        PMID: 32506746      PMCID: PMC7895423          DOI: 10.1002/gepi.22323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Epidemiol        ISSN: 0741-0395            Impact factor:   2.135


  22 in total

1.  Evidence for further breast cancer susceptibility genes in addition to BRCA1 and BRCA2 in a population-based study.

Authors:  A C Antoniou; P D Pharoah; G McMullan; N E Day; B A Ponder; D Easton
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.135

2.  The risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers without a first-degree relative with breast cancer.

Authors:  K A Metcalfe; J Lubinski; J Gronwald; T Huzarski; J McCuaig; H T Lynch; B Karlan; W D Foulkes; C F Singer; S L Neuhausen; L Senter; A Eisen; P Sun; S A Narod
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 4.438

3.  BRCA1 mutations in women attending clinics that evaluate the risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  F J Couch; M L DeShano; M A Blackwood; K Calzone; J Stopfer; L Campeau; A Ganguly; T Rebbeck; B L Weber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Determining carrier probabilities for breast cancer-susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Authors:  G Parmigiani; D Berry; O Aguilar
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually.

Authors:  M H Gail; L A Brinton; D P Byar; D K Corle; S B Green; C Schairer; J J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Effect of BRCA1 and BRCA2 on the association between breast cancer risk and family history.

Authors:  E B Claus; J Schildkraut; E S Iversen; D Berry; G Parmigiani
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1998-12-02       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Calibrated predictions for multivariate competing risks models.

Authors:  Malka Gorfine; Li Hsu; David M Zucker; Giovanni Parmigiani
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Validity of models for predicting BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  Giovanni Parmigiani; Sining Chen; Edwin S Iversen; Tara M Friebel; Dianne M Finkelstein; Hoda Anton-Culver; Argyrios Ziogas; Barbara L Weber; Andrea Eisen; Kathleen E Malone; Janet R Daling; Li Hsu; Elaine A Ostrander; Leif E Peterson; Joellen M Schildkraut; Claudine Isaacs; Camille Corio; Leoni Leondaridis; Gail Tomlinson; Christopher I Amos; Louise C Strong; Donald A Berry; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Sharon Sand; Debra Dutson; Rich Kerber; Beth N Peshkin; David M Euhus
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  The BOADICEA model of genetic susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancers: updates and extensions.

Authors:  A C Antoniou; A P Cunningham; J Peto; D G Evans; F Lalloo; S A Narod; H A Risch; J E Eyfjord; J L Hopper; M C Southey; H Olsson; O Johannsson; A Borg; B Pasini; B Passini; P Radice; S Manoukian; D M Eccles; N Tang; E Olah; H Anton-Culver; E Warner; J Lubinski; J Gronwald; B Gorski; L Tryggvadottir; K Syrjakoski; O-P Kallioniemi; H Eerola; H Nevanlinna; P D P Pharoah; D F Easton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  BOADICEA: a comprehensive breast cancer risk prediction model incorporating genetic and nongenetic risk factors.

Authors:  Andrew Lee; Nasim Mavaddat; Amber N Wilcox; Alex P Cunningham; Tim Carver; Simon Hartley; Chantal Babb de Villiers; Angel Izquierdo; Jacques Simard; Marjanka K Schmidt; Fiona M Walter; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Marc Tischkowitz; Paul Pharoah; Douglas F Easton; Antonis C Antoniou
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  1 in total

1.  Variation in cancer risk among families with genetic susceptibility.

Authors:  Theodore Huang; Danielle Braun; Henry T Lynch; Giovanni Parmigiani
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 2.135

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.