| Literature DB >> 32503672 |
Yao Liu1, Yuanzhen Liu2, Zixiu Du3, Lidan Zhang2, Juan Chen3, Zhen Shen1, Qian Liu1, Juanxiu Qin1, Huiying Lv1, Hua Wang1, Lei He1, Junlan Liu1, Qian Huang1, Yuhui Sun4, Michael Otto5, Min Li6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The alarming spread of antimicrobial resistance requires the development of novel anti-infective drugs. Despite the recent research focus on the human microbiome and its likely value to understand and exploit inter-bacterial inhibitory phenomena as a source for antimicrobial strategies, the human microbiota has barely been investigated for the purpose of drug development.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32503672 PMCID: PMC7275423 DOI: 10.1186/s40168-020-00866-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiome ISSN: 2049-2618 Impact factor: 14.650
Fig. 1Antimicrobial activities among main constituents of the human skin microbiota. a Relative abundance of main genera among culturable bacteria from the skin of human volunteers in different age groups. b Relative abundance of staphylococcal species. c Antimicrobial activities against a series of bacteria of randomly selected S. hominis and S. epidermidis isolates by agar disk diffusion assay. Two μl of bacterial suspensions were spotted on the agar surface. The data of the selected strain S34-1 is marked
Indicator strains used for screening S. hominis and S. epidermidis isolates generating antimicrobial substances
| Strain | Source | Atmosphere | Growth media |
|---|---|---|---|
| From skin; this study | Aerobic | Sheep blood agar | |
| From skin; this study | Aerobic | Sheep blood agar | |
| From skin; this study | Aerobic | Sheep blood agar | |
| From skin; this study | Aerobic | Sheep blood agar | |
| From skin; this study | Aerobic | Sheep blood agar | |
| From skin; this study | Aerobic | Sheep blood agar | |
| From skin; this study | Aerobic | TSA | |
| From skin; this study | Aerobic | Sheep blood agar | |
| From skin; this study | Aerobic | Sheep blood agar | |
| From skin; this study | Aerobic | TSA | |
| From skin; this study | Aerobic | TSA | |
| From acne; this study | Anaerobic | Sheep blood agar | |
| CA-MRSA (ST59) Strain RJ-2 | [ | Aerobic | TSA |
| HA-MRSA (ST5) Strain HS72 | [ | Aerobic | TSA |
Multidrug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens tested for sensitivity toward S. hominis S34-1 activity
| Type of species | Comment | Reference | Antibiogramsa |
|---|---|---|---|
CA-MRSAa (ST1) | Strain MW2 (USA400) | [ | OXA, CFZ, PEN, CXM, FOX |
HA-MRSA (ST5) | Strain HS72, pathogenic, isolated from abscess | [ | OXA, LVX, CLI, CFZ, FOS, ERY, AMK, PEN, GEN, FOX |
| CA-MRSA (ST8) | SF8300 (USA300) | [ | OXA, CFZ, ERY, PEN, CXM, FOX |
LA-MRSA (ST9) | Pathogenic, isolated from bovine mastitis | [ | OXA, LVX, CLI, CFZ, ERY, TGC, PEN, CXM, FOX |
CA-MRSA (ST30) | Strain SF-1497 (USA1100) | [ | OXA, CFZ, PEN, CXM, FOX |
HA-MRSA (ST36) | Strain SF 1208 (USA200) | [ | OXA, LVX, CLI, CFZ, ERY, SAM, PEN, CXM, FOX |
| CA-MRSA (ST59) | Strain RJ-2, pathogenic, isolated from skin infection | [ | OXA, CLI, ERY, PEN, CXM, FOX |
CA-MRSA (ST72) | Strain CN1, South Korea | [ | OXA, CFZ, ERY, PEN, CXM, FOX |
CA-MRSA (ST80) | Strain 07-02662, Germany | [ | OXA, ERY, PEN, FOX |
HA-MRSA (ST239) | Strain HS770, isolated from sputum | [ | OXA, LVX, CLI, CFZ, ERY, AMK, SAM |
CA-MRSA (ST398) | Pathogenic, isolated from blood | [ | OXA, ERY, PEN, FOX |
| Pathogenic, isolated from pleural fluid | This study | OXA, PEN, CIP, SXT, MXF, LVX | |
| Pathogenic, isolated from blood | This study | OXA, PEN, CIP, ERY, MXF, LVX | |
| Pathogenic, isolated from blood | This study | OXA, PEN, ERY | |
| Pathogenic, isolated from sputum | This study | ERY | |
| Pathogenic, isolated from urine | This study | CLI, LVX, CIP, MXF | |
| Pathogenic, isolated from blood | This study | PEN | |
| Pathogenic, isolated from blood | This study | PEN | |
| Pathogenic, isolated from sputum | This study | PEN, CLI, OXA, LVX, ERY, CLR | |
| VRE ( | Pathogenic, isolated from catheter | This study | VAN, PEN, CIP, LVX, ERY, LVX, TEC, TET, AMP, MXF, GEN, CLI, FOF |
| VRE ( | Pathogenic, isolated from urine | This study | VAN, PEN, AMP, CIP, LVX, MXF, ERY, CLI |
| VRE ( | Pathogenic, isolated from urine | This study | VAN, PEN, CIP, LVX, ERY, LVX, TEC, AMP, MXF, STR, CLI, FOF |
aAntibiograms were determined by disc diffusion on Mueller-Hinton agar according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines
Abbreviations: OXA oxacillin, PEN penicillin, LVX levofloxacin, CFZ cephazolin, CXM cefuroxime, FOX cefoxitin, CLI cephalexin, FOS fosfomycin, ERY erythromycin, AMK amikacin, GEN gentamicin, TGC tigecycline, SAM sulbactam/ampicillin, SXT sulphamethoxazole/trimethoprim, MXF moxifloxacin, CIP ciprofloxacin, TET tetracycline, CLR clarithromycin, VAN vancomycin, TEC teicoplanin, STR streptomycin, FOF nitrofurantoin, LA live-associated, CA community-associated, HA hospital-associated
Fig. 2Activity of S. hominis S34-1 and S34-1 culture filtrate toward Gram-positive pathogens. Culture filtrate or bacteria of S. hominis S34-1 were spotted on plates containing the indicated bacterial strains. Refer to “Methods” for strain-specific plate preparation and incubation times
Fig. 3Identification of the antimicrobial activity produced by S. hominis S34-1. a Genetic locus producing the antimicrobial activity and alignment with homologous loci found on plasmid pBac115 of an S. epidermidis strain and on the chromosome of B. cereus ATCC14579, described to produce the thiopeptide micrococcin P1. Amino acid similarity of encoded protein products is shown as well as putative annotation of protein function. b RP-HPLC chromatography of culture filtrates of S34-1 wild-type and the transposon mutant strains that lacked activity. c UV spectrum of purified MP1. d Structure of micrococcin P1
Fig. 41D-NMR and ESI-MS spectra of purified MP1. a 1D-1H-NMR. b ESI-MS.
Fig. 5a In vitro and in vivo growth ofS34-1 andS34-1Δ. Data points are averaged from triplicate measurements. bS. hominis CFU in the abscess model (see Fig.). = 8/group and time point. cS. hominis CFU in the skin punch model (see Fig.). = 6/group and time point. b, c Statistical analysis was by unpaired tests. Differences were not significant (>0.05). Error bars show the mean ± SD
Fig. 6MP1-dependent competitive capacity of S. hominis S34-1 against MRSA during skin infection. Mice received 1 × 107 CFU of the indicated bacteria in 100 μl PBS by subcutaneous infection in the right and left flanks at the dorsum. n = 5 mice/group. a Abscess size comparisons on day 1. Statistical analysis is by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-test. b Abscess sizes over time. c Pictures of abscesses on day 1. d Skin histopathology on day 1. Note extensive infiltration of granulocytes (yellow arrows) in MRSA and MRSA + S34-1Δ groups. a, b Error bars show the mean ± SD. See Fig. 5 for a control experiment comparing CFU of S. hominis S34-1 and S-341Δ
Fig. 7“Probiotic” application of S. hominis S34-1 against S. aureus wound infection. a Wound closure rate. Wound closure is expressed as a decrease in wound size. Mice (n = 4/group) received 1 × 107 CFU (in mixtures, 1 × 107 CFU each) of the indicated bacteria, or PBS as control, in wounds created by excision of a round area with a 6-mm diameter. The S. aureus strain Xen 36 was used. Error bars show the mean ± SD. b Bacterial load in wounds at days 1 and 15 after infection by in vivo imaging of the luminescence expressed by S. aureus strain Xen36
Fig. 8MP1-dependent competitive capacity of S. hominis S34-1 against MRSA in a skin punch model. Mice (n = 17/group) received 1 × 107 CFU of the indicated bacteria (in mixtures, 1 × 107 CFU each) of the indicated bacteria in a 5-mm square hole cut into a 1-cm diameter square silicone sheet pasted on a shaved area on the posterior lower back. CFU was determined by plating of the dissected colonized skin tissue after 24 h. Statistical analysis is by Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s post-test. Error bars show the mean ± SD. See Fig. 5 for a control experiment comparing CFU of S. hominis S34-1 and S34-1Δ
Fig. 9Characterization of PEG-PCL-MP1 micelles. Size distribution (a) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image (b) of MP1-loaded PEG-PCL micelles. (c, d) Toxicity tests toward HaCaT (c) and 293 T cells (d). Cell viability was determined using a cell counting kit (CCK)-8 assay with treatment by free MP1 and PEG-PCL-MP1 at the same MP1 dose and MP1-free PEG-PCL micelles with the same micelle amount as PEG-PCL-MP1 and with incubation for 24 h. Statistical analysis is by 2-way ANOVA. The only statistically significant difference found is marked by an asterisk (p = 0.028). Error bars show the mean ± SD
Fig. 10In vitro antimicrobial activity of PEG-PCL-MP1 nanoparticles. A total of 10 μl of PEG-PCL-MP1 nanoparticles (200 ng/μl) were spotted onto S. aureus test plates and compared to MP1 at the same concentration. S. hominis S34-1 bacteria and bare PEG-PCL (40 μg) were also spotted as controls
MIC determination of MP1 and PEG-PCL-MP1 nanoparticles against S. aureus
| Strains | MIC of PEG-PCL-MP1 (μg/ml) | MIC of free MP1 (μg/ml) |
|---|---|---|
| ST59 | 0.125 | 0.5 |
| ST8 | 0.125 | 0.5 |
| ST5 | 0.25 | 1 |
| ST239 | 0.125 | 0.5 |
| ST398 | 1 | > 1a |
aSolubility of MP1 is ~1 μg/ml, so higher concentrations could not be tested
Fig. 11Application of PEG-PCL-MP1 nanoparticle treatment for MRSA infection. a–d Skin infection. n = 5 mice/group, except PBS and MRSA + PEG-PCL control groups, n = 2. Two abscesses per mouse were produced. a Abscess sizes measured 22 h post-infection with 1 × 108 CFU MRSA (ST59) and the indicated treatment. b Abscess pictures. c, d Levels of cytokine gene expression in 22 h-abscesses determined by qRT-PCR. e High-dose systemic infection (sepsis), survival curves. Animals (n = 8/group) received 5 × 107 CFU MRSA (ST59) and the indicated treatment (3 mg/kg at 1 and 24 h). Analysis is by log-rank (Mantel-Cox) tests of the respective curves versus the MRSA curve. f–h Low-dose systemic infection (bacteremia). Animals (n = 6/group) received 1 × 107 CFU MRSA (ST59) and the indicated treatment. Animals were sacrificed 48 h post-infection. f Macroscopic analyses of livers and kidneys. Representative organs are shown. g Histopathological analysis of liver and kidney tissues. Representative pictures are shown. Arrows indicate tissue necrosis (yellow), hemorrhage (blue) and massive infiltration of inflammatory cells (black). h Bacterial load in the kidneys. a, c, d, h Statistical analysis is by Kruskal-Wallis tests and Dunn’s post-tests. Error bars show the mean ± SD.
Primers for qRT-PCR
| Target genes | Orientation | Sequence (5’-3’) |
|---|---|---|
| IL-6 | Forward Reverse | CTGCAAGAGACTTCCATCCAGTT GGGAAGGCCGTGGTTGTC |
| IL-1β | Forward Reverse | TGCAGAGTTCCCCAACTGGTACATC GTGCTGCCTAATGTCCCCTTGAATC |
| 18S | Forward Reverse | CATTCGAACGTCTGCCCTATC CCTGCTGCCTTCCTTGGA |