| Literature DB >> 32503480 |
Diana Cabrera1, Marlena Kruger2,3, Frances M Wolber3,4,5, Nicole C Roy6,3,7, Karl Fraser6,3,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Understanding the metabolic and lipidomic changes that accompany bone loss in osteoporosis might provide insights about the mechanisms behind molecular changes and facilitate developing new drugs or nutritional strategies for osteoporosis prevention. This study aimed to examine the effects of short- or long-term glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis on plasma metabolites and lipids of ovariectomized (OVX) sheep.Entities:
Keywords: Lipidome; Metabolome; OVX sheep; Osteoporosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32503480 PMCID: PMC7275480 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03362-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Fig. 1Overview of the study design and specific statistical analyses. Short-term study: Plasma metabolite and lipid profiles of 28 sheep, control group n = 10, OVX group n = 12, OVXG n = 6, were analyzed by multivariate and univariate analyses from baseline to two months. Long-term study: Plasma metabolite and lipid profiles of 17 sheep, control group n = 5, OVX group n = 6, OVXG2 n = 3, OVXG5 n = 3, were analyzed by multivariate and univariate analyses from baseline (month zero) to five months
Fig. 2Heatmap showing the longitudinal response for each metabolite in the short-term approach. Data were calculated using a linear mixed model and mean of the relative intensities of the different treatment groups (control group (n = 10), OVX group (n = 12) and OVXG (n = 6)). Blue and yellow indicate decreased and increased relative intensities, respectively
Effect of OVX and OVXG on the metabolite profile of sheep: short-term approach
| Metabolite | OVX vs Control | OVXG vs OVX | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FC | FC | FC | FC | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | Trt | Time | Int | ||
| 233.803 | 5-Methoxytryptophan | 1.20 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | |||
| 148.039 | Methionine | 0.90 | 1.17 | 0.005 | < 0.0001 | 0.028 | ||
| 161.903 | 5-Hydroxylysine | 0.79 | 1.11 | 1.13 | 0.086 | 0.275 | 0.012 | |
| 144.044 | Indole-3-carboxaldehyde | 0.74 | 1.15 | 0.006 | 0.386 | 0.001 | ||
| 116.070 | L-Valine | 0.75 | 1.05 | 0.015 | 0.096 | 0.007 | ||
| 128.034 | 2-Pyrrolidone-5-carboxylic acid | 1.03 | 1.08 | 0.445 | 0.4 | 0.009 | ||
| 131.081 | Glutaric acid | 0.89 | 1.15 | 1.20 | 0.074 | 0.241 | 0.008 | |
| 203.138 | D-Tryptophan | 0.96 | 1.19 | 0.42 | < 0.0001 | 0.042 | ||
Relative intensities were measured in plasma samples of control group (n = 10), OVX group (n = 12) and OVXG (n = 6) using linear mixed models. Results are fold changes (FC) of the lipid intensities between the OVX and control groups and between the OVXG and the OVX groups at month one and month two, among identified compounds by LC-MS. FC with a value > 1 indicated a relatively higher intensity present in treated animals, whereas a value < 1 indicated a relatively lower intensity compared with their respective control animals
All FC values, which are in bold, are significant (p < 0.05)
p calculated using post-hoc Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test for pair-wise multiple comparison of the group means
Fig. 3Heatmap showing the longitudinal response for each metabolite in the long-term approach. Data were calculated using a linear mixed model and mean of the relative intensities of the different treatment groups (control group (n = 5), OVX group (n = 6), OVXG2 (n = 3) and OVXG5 (n = 3)). Blue and yellow indicate decreased and increased relative intensities, respectively
Effect of OVX and OVXG on the metabolite profile of sheep in the long-term analysis
| Metabolite | OVX vs Control | OVXG5 vs OVX | OVXG2 vs OVXG5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FC | FC | FC | FC | FC | FC | FC | FC | FC | FC | FC | FC | FC | FC | FC | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Trt | Time | Int | ||
| 233.803 | 5-Methoxytryptophan | 2.11 | 1.39 | 1.09 | 1.08 | 0.92 | 1.06 | 1.31 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.45 | 0.001 | < 0.0001 | 0.015 | |||||
| 148.039 | Methionine | 0.97 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.92 | 1.18 | 1.10 | 0.98 | 1.46 | 1.58 | 1.08 | 1.53 | 1.67 | 0.098 | 0.003 | 0.012 | |||
| 161.903 | 5-Hydroxylysine | 1.14 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 1.06 | 1.10 | 1.19 | 0.83 | 1.18 | 1.09 | 1.07 | 1.15 | 0.335 | 0.374 | 0.007 | ||||
| 164.071 | L-Phenylalanine | 1.13 | 0.78 | 1.18 | 1.13 | 1.19 | 0.70 | 1.09 | 0.96 | 1.28 | 1.09 | 1.11 | 1.03 | 0.057 | 0.229 | 0.003 | |||
| 144.044 | Indole-3-carboxaldehyde | 1.06 | 0.97 | 1.27 | 1.52 | 1.41 | 0.65 | 0.87 | 1.03 | 0.96 | 1.40 | 1.39 | 0.83 | 0.44 | 0.493 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | ||
| 116.070 | L-Valine | 0.70 | 1.05 | 0.83 | 1.16 | 1.15 | 1.07 | 0.74 | 0.82 | 1.01 | 1.00 | 1.26 | 1.59 | 1.29 | 0.79 | 0.418 | 0.136 | 0.011 | |
| 133.043 | Malic acid | 0.91 | 1.21 | 1.17 | 0.93 | 1.10 | 1.02 | 1.03 | 0.82 | 1.03 | 1.09 | 0.98 | 1.26 | 0.95 | 0.643 | 0.027 | 0.03 | ||
| 203.138 | D-Tryptophan | 1.07 | 0.70 | 1.05 | 0.99 | 1.24 | 0.83 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 1.35 | 0.82 | 1.25 | 0.90 | 1.07 | 0.673 | < 0.0001 | 0.001 | ||
Relative intensities were measured in plasma samples of control group (n = 5), OVX group (n = 6), OVXG2 (n = 3) and OVXG5 (n = 3) using a linear mixed model. Results are fold changes (FC) of the metabolite abundance between the OVX and control groups, between the OVXG5 and the OVX groups and between the OVXG2 and the OVXG5 groups from month one to month five, among identified compounds by LC-MS
FC with a value > 1 indicates a relatively higher intensity present in treated ewes, whereas a value < 1 indicates a relatively lower intensity compared with their respective control animals
All FC values in bold are significant (p < 0.05)
p calculated using post-hoc Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test for pair-wise multiple comparison of the group means
Fig. 4Heatmap showing the longitudinal response for each lipid in the short-term approach. Data were calculated using a linear mixed model and mean of the relative intensities of the different treatment groups (control group (n = 10), OVX group (n = 12) and OVXG (n = 6)). PG = phosphatidylglycerol, CL = cardiolipin, PI = phosphatidylinositol. Blue and yellow indicate decreased and increased relative intensities, respectively
Effect of OVX and OVXG on the lipidome of sheep in the short-term approach
| Lipid class | OVX vs Control | OVXG vs OVX | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FC | FC | FC | FC | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | Trt | Time | Int | ||
| 735.521 | PG 33:0 | 1.08 | 0.91 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 0.002 | 0.075 | 0.003 |
| 752.511 | CL 76:7 | 1.11 | 1.00 | 1.01 | 0.83 | 0.004 | 0.003 | 0.013 |
| 726.496 | CL 72:5 | 1.08 | 1.02 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.005 | 0.011 | 0.016 |
| 785.429 | PI 31:5 | 1.15 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.87 | 0.011 | 0.01 | 0.028 |
| 557.236 | PI 14:0 | 1.23 | 0.94 | 1.02 | 0.82 | 0.035 | 0.104 | 0.038 |
Relative intensities were measured in plasma samples of control group (n = 10), OVX group (n = 12) and OVXG (n = 6) using linear mixed models. Results are fold changes (FC) of the lipid intensities between the OVX and control groups and between the OVXG and the OVX groups at month one and month two, among identified compounds by LC-MS. FC with a value > 1 indicated a relatively higher intensity present in treated animals, whereas a value < 1 indicated a relatively lower intensity compared with their respective control animals
PG phosphatidylglycerol, CL cardiolipin, PI phosphatidylinositol
Fig. 5Heatmap showing the longitudinal response for each lipid in the long-term approach. Data were calculated using a linear mixed model and mean of the relative intensities of the different treatment groups (control group (n = 5), OVX group (n = 6), OVXG2 (n = 3) and OVXG5 (n = 3). CL = cardiolipin, CerP = ceramide 1-phosphates, PI = phosphatidylinositol, PA = phosphatidic acid, lysoPE = lysophosphatidylethanolamines, PS = phosphatidylserines, PG = phosphatidylglycerol. Blue and yellow indicate decreased and increased relative intensities, respectively
Effect of OVX and OVXG on the lipidome of sheep in the long-term analysis
| Lipid class | OVX vs Control | OVXG5 vs OVX | OVXG2 vs OVXG5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FC | FC | FC | FC | FC | FC | FC | FC | FC | FC | FC | FC | FC | FC | FC | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Trt | Time | Int | ||
| 725.492 | CL 72:6 | 1.20 | 0.91 | 1.16 | 0.98 | 1.05 | 0.89 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 1.06 | 0.90 | 1.06 | 1.05 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 1.04 | 0.018 | 0.082 | 0.023 |
| 752.511 | CL 76:7 | 1.15 | 0.89 | 0.87 | 1.11 | 0.95 | 0.82 | 0.94 | 1.15 | 1.10 | 1.09 | 0.82 | 0.94 | 1.17 | 0.088 | 0.023 | 0.016 | ||
| 726.496 | CL 72:5 | 1.19 | 0.91 | 0.95 | 1.02 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 0.87 | 1.06 | 0.88 | 1.19 | 1.05 | 1.01 | 0.97 | 1.05 | 0.03 | 0.026 | 0.018 | |
| 751.518 | CL 76:8 | 1.23 | 0.92 | 1.02 | 1.12 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 0.92 | 1.07 | 0.84 | 1.27 | 0.87 | 0.90 | 0.86 | 1.03 | 0.011 | 0.06 | 0.042 | |
| 800.511 | CL 84:15 | 0.97 | 1.07 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.99 | 0.88 | 1.03 | 1.10 | 0.93 | 1.04 | 0.027 | 0.06 | 0.005 | |||||
| 686.546 | CerP 39:1 | 0.91 | 1.02 | 1.09 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.99 | 1.08 | 1.08 | 1.22 | 0.86 | 0.83 | 1.13 | 0.042 | 0.071 | 0.014 | |||
| 660.543 | CerP 37:0 | 0.93 | 0.99 | 1.10 | 0.94 | 0.91 | 1.04 | 0.92 | 1.04 | 1.13 | 0.91 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.019 | 0.029 | 0.045 | |||
| 785.429 | PI 31:5 | 1.31 | 0.87 | 0.90 | 1.09 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.93 | 1.11 | 0.77 | 1.24 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 0.89 | 1.18 | 0.022 | 0.022 | 0.016 | |
| 557.236 | PI 14:0 | 1.43 | 0.81 | 1.14 | 0.89 | 0.76 | 1.02 | 1.20 | 0.80 | 1.20 | 1.30 | 0.69 | 0.83 | 1.03 | 0.12 | 0.153 | 0.019 | ||
| 543.316 | PA 25:3 | 1.23 | 0.92 | 1.06 | 0.92 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 1.09 | 0.94 | 1.19 | 1.25 | 0.88 | 0.83 | 0.99 | 0.117 | 0.103 | 0.018 | ||
| 489.253 | PA 21:2 | 1.40 | 0.79 | 1.31 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.86 | 0.94 | 0.90 | 1.24 | 0.90 | 1.13 | 1.13 | 0.86 | 0.79 | 1.04 | 0.099 | 0.046 | 0.024 |
| 464.323 | lysoPE 18:0 | 1.44 | 0.83 | 0.93 | 1.19 | 0.77 | 0.88 | 0.82 | 1.04 | 0.92 | 1.33 | 1.16 | 0.95 | 0.90 | 0.93 | 0.014 | 0.004 | 0.043 | |
| 558.243 | PS 20:4 | 1.36 | 0.85 | 1.02 | 0.93 | 0.90 | 0.83 | 0.91 | 1.22 | 0.88 | 1.12 | 1.20 | 0.86 | 0.80 | 1.09 | 0.073 | 0.036 | 0.038 | |
| 861.656 | PG 42:0 | 0.84 | 1.22 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.93 | 0.90 | 1.26 | 0.98 | 1.03 | 1.16 | 0.92 | 0.80 | 0.99 | 0.138 | 0.185 | 0.026 | |
Relative intensities were measured in plasma samples of control group (n = 5), OVX group (n = 6), OVXG2 (n = 3) and OVXG5 (n = 3) using a linear mixed model. Results are fold changes (FC) of the lipid abundance between the OVXG5 and the OVX groups and between the OVXG2 and the OVXG5 groups from month one to month five, among identified compounds by LC-MS. FC with a value > 1 indicated a relatively higher intensity present in treated animals, whereas a value < 1 indicated a relatively lower intensity compared with their respective control animals
All FC values, which are in bold, are significant at p < 0.05 calculated using post-hoc Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (LSD) test for pair-wise multiple comparison of the group means
CL cardiolipin, CerP ceramide 1-phosphates, PI phosphatidylinositol, PA phosphatidic acid, lysoPE lysophosphatidylethanolamines, PS phosphatidylserines, PG phosphatidylglycerol