Syed Uzair Ahmed1, Suzanne Humphreys1, Carly Rivers1, Melanie Jeffrey1, Daryl R Fourney1. 1. From the Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask. (Ahmed, Fourney); the Rick Hansen Institute, Vancouver, B.C. (Humphreys, Rivers); and the Waakebiness-Bryce Institute for Indigenous Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Jeffrey).
Abstract
Background: People of Aboriginal (Indigenous) ancestry are more likely to experience traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) than other Canadians; however, outcome studies are limited. This study aims to compare Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal populations with acute TSCI with respect to preinjury baseline characteristics, injury severity, treatment, outcomes and length of stay. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of participants with a TSCI who were enrolled in the prospective Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR), Saskatoon site (Royal University Hospital), between Feb. 13, 2010, and Dec. 17, 2016. Demographic, injury and management data were assessed to identify any differences between the populations. Results: Of the 159 patients admitted to Royal University Hospital with an acute TSCI during the study period, 62 provided consent and were included in the study. Of these, 21 self-identified as Aboriginal (33.9%) and 41 as non-Aboriginal (66.1%) on treatment intake forms. Compared with non-Aboriginal participants, Aboriginal participants were younger, had fewer medical comorbidities, had a similar severity of neurologic injury and had similar clinical outcomes. However, the time to discharge to the community was significantly longer for Aboriginal participants (median 104.0 v. 34.0 d, p = 0.016). Although 35% of non-Aboriginal participants were discharged home from the acute care site, no Aboriginal participants were transferred home directly. Conclusion: This study suggests a need for better allocation of resources for transition to the community for Aboriginal people with a TSCI in Saskatchewan. We plan to assess outcomes from TSCI for Aboriginal people across Canada.
Background: People of Aboriginal (Indigenous) ancestry are more likely to experience traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) than other Canadians; however, outcome studies are limited. This study aims to compare Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal populations with acute TSCI with respect to preinjury baseline characteristics, injury severity, treatment, outcomes and length of stay. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of participants with a TSCI who were enrolled in the prospective Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR), Saskatoon site (Royal University Hospital), between Feb. 13, 2010, and Dec. 17, 2016. Demographic, injury and management data were assessed to identify any differences between the populations. Results: Of the 159 patients admitted to Royal University Hospital with an acute TSCI during the study period, 62 provided consent and were included in the study. Of these, 21 self-identified as Aboriginal (33.9%) and 41 as non-Aboriginal (66.1%) on treatment intake forms. Compared with non-Aboriginal participants, Aboriginal participants were younger, had fewer medical comorbidities, had a similar severity of neurologic injury and had similar clinical outcomes. However, the time to discharge to the community was significantly longer for Aboriginal participants (median 104.0 v. 34.0 d, p = 0.016). Although 35% of non-Aboriginal participants were discharged home from the acute care site, no Aboriginal participants were transferred home directly. Conclusion: This study suggests a need for better allocation of resources for transition to the community for Aboriginal people with a TSCI in Saskatchewan. We plan to assess outcomes from TSCI for Aboriginal people across Canada.
Authors: Donna M Dryden; L Duncan Saunders; Brian H Rowe; Laura A May; Niko Yiannakoulias; Lawrence W Svenson; Donald P Schopflocher; Donald C Voaklander Journal: Can J Neurol Sci Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: V K Noonan; B K Kwon; L Soril; M G Fehlings; R J Hurlbert; A Townson; M Johnson; M F Dvorak Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2011-11-01 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: R A Glennie; C S Bailey; E C Tsai; V K Noonan; C S Rivers; D R Fourney; H Ahn; B K Kwon; J Paquet; B Drew; M G Fehlings; N Attabib; S D Christie; J Finkelstein; R J Hurlbert; S Parent; M F Dvorak Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2017-04-18 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: Brian Lenehan; John Street; Brian K Kwon; Vanessa Noonan; Hongbin Zhang; Charles G Fisher; Marcel F Dvorak Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2012-02-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Mariana Brussoni; M Anne George; Andrew Jin; Ofer Amram; Rod McCormick; Christopher E Lalonde Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-01-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: K Walden; L M Bélanger; F Biering-Sørensen; S P Burns; E Echeverria; S Kirshblum; R J Marino; V K Noonan; S E Park; R K Reeves; W Waring; M F Dvorak Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 2.772