Literature DB >> 15858104

Flat-panel-detector chest radiography: effect of tube voltage on image quality.

Martin Uffmann1, Ulrich Neitzel, Mathias Prokop, Nahla Kabalan, Michael Weber, Christian J Herold, Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the visibility of anatomic structures in direct-detector chest radiographs acquired with different tube voltages at equal effective doses to the patient.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study protocol was approved by the institutional internal review board, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Posteroanterior chest radiographs of 48 consecutively selected patients were obtained at 90, 121, and 150 kVp by using a flat-panel-detector unit that was based on cesium iodide technology and automated exposure control. Monte Carlo simulations were used to verify that the effective dose for all kilovoltage settings was equal. Five radiologists subjectively and independently rated the delineation of anatomic structures on hard-copy images by using a five-point scale. They also ranked image quality in a blinded side-by-side comparison. Average ranking scores were compared by using one-way analysis of variance with repeated measures. Data were analyzed for the entire patient group and for two patient subgroups that were formed according to body mass index (BMI).
RESULTS: The visibility scores of most anatomic structures were significantly superior with the 90-kVp images (mean score, 3.11), followed by the 121-kVp (mean score, 2.95) and 150-kVp images (mean score, 2.80). Differences did not reach significance (P > .05) only for the delineation of the peripheral vessels, the heart contours, and the carina. This was also true for the subgroup of patients (n = 24) with a BMI greater than and the subgroup of patients (n = 24) with a BMI less than the mean BMI (26.9 kg/m(2)). At side-by-side comparison, the readers rated 90-kVp images as having superior image quality in the majority of image triplets; the percentage of 90-kVp images rated as "first choice" ranged from 60% (29 of 48 patients) to 90% (43 of 48 patients), with a median of 88% (42 of 48 patients), among the readers.
CONCLUSION: Delineation of most anatomic structures and overall image quality were ranked superior in digital radiographs acquired with lower kilovoltage at a constant effective patient dose. (c) RSNA, 2005.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15858104     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2352031730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Balance of required dose and image quality in digital radiography].

Authors:  M Uffmann; C Schaefer-Prokop; U Neitzel
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Optimal beam quality for chest flat panel detector system: realistic phantom study.

Authors:  Chie Kuwahara; Takatoshi Aoki; Nobuhiro Oda; Jun Kawabata; Koichiro Sugimoto; Michiko Kobayashi; Masami Fujii; Yukunori Korogi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  [Dose reduction and adequate image quality in digital radiography: a contradiction?].

Authors:  S Pötter-Lang; M Dünkelmeyer; M Uffmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Optimisation of radiological protocols for chest imaging using computed radiography and flat-panel X-ray detectors.

Authors:  G Compagnone; M Casadio Baleni; E Di Nicola; M Valentino; M Benati; L F Calzolaio; N Oberhofer; E Fabbri; S Domenichelli; L Barozzi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Dose reduction and image quality improvement of chest radiography by using bone-suppression technique and low tube voltage: a phantom study.

Authors:  Satoshi Takagi; Tatsuya Yaegashi; Masayori Ishikawa
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Correlation of image quality parameters with tube voltage in X-ray dark-field chest radiography: a phantom study.

Authors:  Andreas P Sauter; Jana Andrejewski; Manuela Frank; Konstantin Willer; Julia Herzen; Felix Meurer; Alexander A Fingerle; Markus R Makowski; Franz Pfeiffer; Daniela Pfeiffer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Optimizing imaging quality and radiation dose by the age-dependent setting of tube voltage in pediatric chest digital radiography.

Authors:  Hui Guo; Wen-Ya Liu; Xiao-Ye He; Xiao-Shan Zhou; Qun-Li Zeng; Bai-Yan Li
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 8.  Digital chest radiography: an update on modern technology, dose containment and control of image quality.

Authors:  Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop; Ulrich Neitzel; Henk W Venema; Martin Uffmann; Mathias Prokop
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  A paediatric X-ray exposure chart.

Authors:  Stephen P Knight
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2014-06-09

10.  An evaluation of the effect of tube potential on clinical image quality using direct digital detectors for pelvis and lumbar spine radiographs.

Authors:  Nicole E Peacock; Adam L Steward; Peter J Riley
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2020-06-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.