| Literature DB >> 32495072 |
Alessandro Giudici1, Carlo Palombo2, Michaela Kozakova3, Carmela Morizzo2, Lorenzo Losso2, Monica Nannipieri3, Rossana Berta4, Alun D Hughes5, J Kennedy Cruickshank6, Ashraf W Khir7.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Obesity clearly increases cardiovascular risk, often inducing high blood pressure (BP), impaired left ventricular (LV) function, and increased arterial stiffness. Intensive weight loss and bariatric surgery induce improvement in hypertension and diabetes for morbid obesity. Carotid artery haemodynamics is a powerful prognostic indicator for stroke and cognitive decline independent of BP. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a 3-stage bariatric strategy of diet, bariatric surgery, and consequent weight loss on carotid haemodynamics and cardiac diastolic function.Entities:
Keywords: Bariatric surgery; Carotid artery; Carotid local PWV; LV function; Obesity; lnDU-loop
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32495072 PMCID: PMC7651614 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-020-04686-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Obes Surg ISSN: 0960-8923 Impact factor: 4.129
Fig. 2The carotid lnDU-loop measured at baseline, post-diet, and post-surgery. The linear regression of the early systolic portion of the loop is shown for each lnD-U relationship. The slope of the early systolic portion of the loop slightly increased after the diet and increased more markedly after the surgical procedure. PWV was 6.35 m/s, reduced to 5.44 after the diet and to 3.54 m/s after the surgery. Carotid pulse diameter, expressed as the difference between maximum and minimum diameters, increased significantly from basal to post-diet and post-surgery acquisition. On the other hand, the pulse velocity (Umax-Umin) remained approximately constant
Fig. 1Example of wave intensity for one of the subjects (not showing late diastole when wave intensity is minimal). The wave intensity (dI) pattern is characterised by three main peaks: forward compression (FCW) and forward expansion waves (FEW), and a backward compression wave (BCW). See “Methods” for details
Physical and haemodynamics features of subjects included in the study. Participant characteristics: baseline, post-diet, and post-surgery values. Values are mean ± SD. Pressure was recorded at the brachial artery. SBP, systolic BP; DBP, diastolic BP. *p < 0.05, †p < 0.01 with respect to basal value; ‡p < 0.05, §p < 0.01 with respect to diet
| Baseline | Post-diet | Post-surgery | rm-ANOVA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (kg) | 129.9 ± 27.0 | 123 ± 24.8† | 90.5 ± 21.3†,§ | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 47.9 ± 7.1 | 45.5 ± 6.7† | 33.4 ± 6.9†,§ | |
| BSA (m2) | 2.29 ± 0.28 | 2.24 ± 0.26† | 1.96 ± 0.24†,§ | |
| SBP (mmHg) | 122.2 ± 13.3 | 116.3 ± 12.4† | 115.7 ± 16.8* | |
| DBP (mmHg) | 81.5 ± 7.5 | 78.1 ± 6.2† | 77.0 ± 9.0* | |
| PP (mmHg) | 40.7 ± 10.0 | 38.2 ± 9.4 | 38.7 ± 10.4 | |
| Mean BP (mmHg) | 91.7 ± 8.2 | 87.6 ± 7.1† | 86.7 ± 10.5* |
Cardiac indices at baseline, post-diet, and post-surgery. Values are presented as mean ± SD. SV, stroke volume; CO, cardiac output; EF, ejection fraction; LV mass, left ventricular mass; LVMI, left ventricular mass index; TDI, tissue Doppler imaging. s′, e′, and a′ velocities are systolic, early diastolic, and late diastolic transmitral velocity, respectively. *p < 0.05, †p < 0.01 with respect to basal value; ‡p < 0.05, §p < 0.01 with respect to diet
| Baseline | Post-diet | Post-surgery | rm-ANOVA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (bpm) | 76 ± 10 | 69 ± 10† | 61 ± 10†,§ | |
| SV (mL) | 92 ± 18 | 84 ± 17 | 89 ± 16 | |
| CO (L/min) | 7.0 ± 1.5 | 5.8 ± 1.2† | 5.4 ± 1.2†,‡ | |
| EF [-] | 68 ± 5 | 65 ± 4 | 67 ± 5 | |
| TPR (mmHg/L/min) | 13.6 ± 2.9 | 15.9 ± 3.5† | 16.8 ± 3.3† | |
| LV mass (g) | 204 ± 53 | 206 ± 51 | 202 ± 41 | |
| LVMI (g/m2) | 53 ± 12 | 54 ± 10 | 53 ± 11 | |
| RWT [-] | 0.37 ± 0.05 | 0.37 ± 0.04 | 0.36 ± 0.05 | |
| TDI s′ velocity (cm/s) | 9.8 ± 1.3 | 9.4 ± 1.4 | 9.4 ± 1.4 | |
| TDI e′ velocity (cm/s) | 12.7 ± 2.8 | 12.9 ± 2.4 | 14.3 ± 3.1†,§ | |
| TDI a′ velocity (cm/s) | 13.2 ± 2.3 | 12.6 ± 1.8 | 11.5 ± 1.9†,§ | |
| Mitral E velocity (cm/s) | 68.9 ± 17.2 | 75.3 ± 19.4 | 84.0 ± 18.6 | |
| Mitral A velocity (cm/s) | 74.7 ± 19.9 | 74.3 ± 21.8 | 69.3 ± 19.5*,‡ | |
| TDI e′/a′ ratio | 0.98 ± 0.25 | 1.04 ± 0.22 | 1.28 ± 0.36†,§ | |
| E/A ratio | 0.95 ± 0.20 | 1.05 ± 0.22* | 1.27 ± 0.31†,§ | |
| E/e′ ratio | 5.78 ± 2.15 | 6.08 ± 2.13 | 6.14 ± 1.91 |
Haemodynamic indices at baseline, post-diet, and post-surgery. D, maximum carotid diameter; D, minimum carotid diameter; ∆D, Dmax-Dmin; U, maximum carotid velocity; U, minimum carotid velocity; PWV, non-invasive carotid pulse wave velocity; D, carotid distensibility. *p < 0.05, †p < 0.01 with respect to basal value; ‡p < 0.05, §p < 0.01 with respect to diet
| Baseline | Post-diet | Post-surgery | rm-ANOVA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carotid flow (L/min) | 0.60 ± 0.20 | 0.60 ± 0.17 | 0.55 ± 0.18 | |
| Dmax (mm) | 8.23 ± 1.22 | 8.11 ± 1.11 | 7.95 ± 1.18* | |
| Dmin (mm) | 7.76 ± 1.18 | 7.63 ± 1.06 | 7.41 ± 1.10† | |
| ∆D (mm) | 0.47 ± 0.11 | 0.48 ± 0.13 | 0.54 ± 0.16†,§ | |
| ∆D/Dmin % | 6.08 ± 1.41 | 6.35 ± 1.69 | 7.30 ± 1.93†,§ | |
| Umax (m/s) | 0.53 ± 0.10 | 0.55 ± 0.13 | 0.51 ± 0.09 | |
| Umin (m/s) | 0.06 ± 0.06 | 0.07 ± 0.07 | 0.07 ± 0.07 | |
| 6.27 ± 1.35 | 5.52 ± 0.93† | 4.74 ± 1.09†,§ | ||
| 27.5 ± 11.2 | 33.6 ± 10.9† | 50.0 ± 27.0†,§ |
Fig. 3Average forward compression wave (FCW) (left), backward compression wave (BCW), and forward expansion wave (FEW) (right) area at baseline, post-diet, and post-surgery. Results are mean ± 95% confidence interval. BCW and FEW are shown separately (right panel) for clarity