Literature DB >> 32494026

RBMX is required for activation of ATR on repetitive DNAs to maintain genome stability.

Tian Zheng1, Haoxian Zhou1, Xiaocui Li1, Di Peng2, Yiding Yang1, Yanru Zeng2, Haiying Liu1, Jian Ren2, Yong Zhao3,4.   

Abstract

ATR is a master regulator of cell response to replication stress. Adequate activation of ATR is essential for preventing genome aberrance induced by replication defect. However, the mechanism underlying ATR activation is not fully understood. Here, we identify that RBMX is an ssDNA binding protein that orchestrates a novel pathway to activate ATR. Using super-resolution STORM, we observe that RBMX and RPA bind to adjacent but nonoverlapping sites on ssDNA in response to replication stress. RBMX then binds to and facilitates positioning of TopBP1, which activates nearby ATR associated with RPA. In addition, ATR activation by ssDNA-RBMX-TopBP1 is independent of ssDNA-dsDNA junction and 9-1-1 complex. ChIP-seq analysis reveals that RBMX/RPA are highly enriched on repetitive DNAs, which are considered as fragile sites with high replication stress. RBMX depletion leads to defective localization of TopBP1 to replication stressed sites and inadequate activation of ATR. Furthermore, cells with deficient RBMX demonstrate replication defect, leading to formation of micronuclei and a high rate of sister-chromatin exchange, indicative of genome instability. Together, the results identify a new ssDNA-RBMX-TopBP1 pathway that is specifically required for activation of ATR on repetitive DNAs. Therefore, RBMX is a key factor to ensure genome stability during replication.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32494026      PMCID: PMC7560680          DOI: 10.1038/s41418-020-0570-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Death Differ        ISSN: 1350-9047            Impact factor:   15.828


  65 in total

Review 1.  Toward maintaining the genome: DNA damage and replication checkpoints.

Authors:  Kara A Nyberg; Rhett J Michelson; Charles W Putnam; Ted A Weinert
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2002-06-11       Impact factor: 16.830

Review 2.  Regulation of DNA replication by ATR: signaling in response to DNA intermediates.

Authors:  David Shechter; Vincenzo Costanzo; Jean Gautier
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2004 Aug-Sep

Review 3.  The checkpoint response to replication stress.

Authors:  Dana Branzei; Marco Foiani
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2009-05-23

Review 4.  DNA damage sensing by the ATM and ATR kinases.

Authors:  Alexandre Maréchal; Lee Zou
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 5.  ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK: The Trinity at the Heart of the DNA Damage Response.

Authors:  Andrew N Blackford; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  ATR disruption leads to chromosomal fragmentation and early embryonic lethality.

Authors:  E J Brown; D Baltimore
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  A mouse model of ATR-Seckel shows embryonic replicative stress and accelerated aging.

Authors:  Matilde Murga; Samuel Bunting; Maria F Montaña; Rebeca Soria; Francisca Mulero; Marta Cañamero; Youngsoo Lee; Peter J McKinnon; Andre Nussenzweig; Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  ATR functions as a gene dosage-dependent tumor suppressor on a mismatch repair-deficient background.

Authors:  Yanan Fang; Cheng-Chung Tsao; Barbara K Goodman; Ryohei Furumai; Carlos A Tirado; Robert T Abraham; Xiao-Fan Wang
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 9.  The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives.

Authors:  Alberto Ciccia; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  Distinct roles for DNA-PK, ATM and ATR in RPA phosphorylation and checkpoint activation in response to replication stress.

Authors:  Shengqin Liu; Stephen O Opiyo; Karoline Manthey; Jason G Glanzer; Amanda K Ashley; Courtney Amerin; Kyle Troksa; Meena Shrivastav; Jac A Nickoloff; Greg G Oakley
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  RBM22, a Key Player of Pre-mRNA Splicing and Gene Expression Regulation, Is Altered in Cancer.

Authors:  Benoît Soubise; Yan Jiang; Nathalie Douet-Guilbert; Marie-Bérengère Troadec
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 6.639

2.  hnRNP G/RBMX enhances HPV16 E2 mRNA splicing through a novel splicing enhancer and inhibits production of spliced E7 oncogene mRNAs.

Authors:  Chengyu Hao; Yunji Zheng; Johanna Jönsson; Xiaoxu Cui; Haoran Yu; Chengjun Wu; Naoko Kajitani; Stefan Schwartz
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 19.160

3.  Analysis of N6-Methyladenosine RNA Methylation Regulators in Diagnosis and Distinct Molecular Subtypes of Ankylosing Spondylitis.

Authors:  Cheng Zhong; Jia-Hua Liang; Zhen Chen; Li-Ping Zhong; Guo-Dong Sun; Wei-Xing Xie; Dong-Ping Wang; Wen-de Zhuang; Hao-Hua Guo; Da-Xiang Jin; Yu-Ming Li
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 4.  Global mapping of cancers: The Cancer Genome Atlas and beyond.

Authors:  Carlo Ganini; Ivano Amelio; Riccardo Bertolo; Pierluigi Bove; Oreste Claudio Buonomo; Eleonora Candi; Chiara Cipriani; Nicola Di Daniele; Hartmut Juhl; Alessandro Mauriello; Carla Marani; John Marshall; Sonia Melino; Paolo Marchetti; Manuela Montanaro; Maria Emanuela Natale; Flavia Novelli; Giampiero Palmieri; Mauro Piacentini; Erino Angelo Rendina; Mario Roselli; Giuseppe Sica; Manfredi Tesauro; Valentina Rovella; Giuseppe Tisone; Yufang Shi; Ying Wang; Gerry Melino
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 6.603

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.