| Literature DB >> 32490248 |
Sayed-Hamidreza Mozhgani1,2, Hanie Ahmadzade Kermani3, Mehdi Norouzi3,4, Mohsen Arabi5, Saber Soltani3.
Abstract
Early detection of retroviruses including human T-cell lymphotropic virus and human immunodeficiency virus in the human body is indispensable to prevent retroviral infection propagation and improve clinical treatment. Until now, diverse techniques have been employed for the early detection of viruses. Traditional methods are time-consuming, resource-intensive, and laborious performing. Therefore, designing and constructing a selective and sensitive diagnosis system to detect serious diseases is highly demanded. Genetic detection with high sensitivity has striking significance for the early detection and remedy of disparate pathogenic diseases. The nucleic acid biosensors are based on the identification of specific DNA sequences in biological samples. Nanotechnology has an important impact on the development of sensitive biosensors. Different kinds of nanomaterials include nanoparticles, nanoclusters, quantum dots, carbon nanotubes, nanocomposites, etc., with different properties have been used to improve the performance of biosensors. Recently, DNA nanobiosensors are developed to provide simple, fast, selective, low-cost, and sensitive detection of infectious diseases. In this paper, the research progresses of nano genosensors for the detection of HIV-1 and HTLV-1 viruses, based on electrochemical, optical, and photoelectrochemical platforms are overviewed.Entities:
Keywords: Analytical chemistry; DNA nanobiosensors; Early detection; Human T-cell lymphotropic virus (HTLV); Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Infectious disease; Nanotechnology
Year: 2020 PMID: 32490248 PMCID: PMC7260287 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04048
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the HIV gene detection using DNA immobilized on the ternary polymer-sandwiched composite as a sensor template. Reprinted with permission from [34].
Figure 2Schematic illustration of the enzyme- and label-free electrochemical diagnosis of HIV- DNA based on the self-assembled DNA nanostructures [48]. Copyright 2012, American Chemical Society.
Figure 3(A) The illustration of a LA assay strip. (B) The schematic of strand-displacement amplification and positive or negative expression on strips. Reprinted with permission from [61].
Figure 4(A) Linearity of HIV-DNA determination by the manufactured testing strips. (B) The outcomes of examination of various HIV-DNA concentrations of by the proposed LFA strips under the ultraviolet light. Reprinted with permission from [61].
Figure 5Schematic of the diagnosis stages of HTLV-1 DNA target based on the fluorescence quenching of carbon dots in the attendance of iron magnetic nanoparticle capped Au [69].
Figure 6(A) Schematic image of the DNA nanomachine steps for the sensitive diagnosis of HIV DNA by DNA nanomachine. (B) The DNA walker cascade amplification process on AuNP surface. Reproduced from [72], with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 7Representation of the analysis of the HIV-DNA using DNA/AgNCs and autonomous exonuclease III (Exo III)-assisted recycling signal amplification, A) Fluorescence on; B) Fluorescence off. Reproduced from [78], with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 8Electrogenerated chemiluminescence (ECL) diagnosis of HIV- DNA with the DNA-based hybridization chain reaction. Reprinted with permission from [96].
Figure 9A) The representation of the construction of double-layer DNA tetrahedrons (DDTs); (B) Schematic illustration of the SPR biosensing platform for the HIV-DNA detection based on the dynamic ESDRs and structural DDTs Nanodevices. Reprinted with permission from [100].
Figure 10PCR-DLS assay for the diagnosis of HIV- DNA based on the mean diameter change of AuNPs. Reprinted with permission from [113]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society.
Figure 11The fabrication of PEC biosensor for the diagnosis of HIV-1 photoactive materials and triple-helix molecular switch. Reprinted with permission from [116].
Comparison of analytical performance (linear range and LOD) of the different nano biosensing systems for detection of HIV-1.
| Detection Method | Strategy | Limit of Detection | Linear Range | Ref. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electrochemical | Square Wave Voltammetry (SWV) | CNT screen printed working electrode | 0.1 pg/μl | 0.2–25 μg/ml | [ |
| PTCA/graphene sheets functionalized with AnNPs | 34 f M | 10 pM - 1μM | [ | ||
| Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) | graphene/nafion nanofilm modified GC electrode | 0.23 f M | 10 pM–10 nM | [ | |
| GC electrode modified with AuNPs/PABA/ERGO nanocomposite film | 340 f M | 10 fM – 10 μM | [ | ||
| Signal amplification of multiwall carbon nanotubes loaded AgNPs | 0.5 pM | 1–100 pM | [ | ||
| Differential Pulse Voltammetry (DPV) | Long range self-assembled DNA nanostructures on gold electrode | 5 aM | 2 aM–10 pM | [ | |
| Graphene stabilized AuNCs modified GC electrode | 10 f M | 0.1 fM – 100 nM | [ | ||
| Hybride Methods | Chitosan/Fe3O4 immobilized DNA probe | 50 pM | 50–100 pM | [ | |
| ssDNA/polyaniline/graphene nanocomposites platform | 50 fM | 50 fM -10 nM | [ | ||
| Binding of DNA probe to porous NiCo2O4/CoO/CNTs composite | 16.7 fM | 0.1 pM-2nM | [ | ||
| Optical | Fluorescence | FRET between CdTe QDs and CDs | 1 nM | 0–50 nM | [ |
| Integration of Lateral Flow assay strips and QDs | 0.76 pM | 1 pM–10 nM | [ | ||
| CdTe QDs tagged complementary DNA probe | 50 pM | 5μM–2000 μM | [ | ||
| FRET between AuNPs/graphene oxide and CDs | 5 fM | 5μM–0.4 nM | [ | ||
| Peroxidase like activity of Pt/Au NPs and separation of magnetic NPs | 5 pM | 10pM–500pM | [ | ||
| DNA nanomachine based on Au NPs and RCA | 1.46 fM | 5 fM-1.67 pM | [ | ||
| Hairpin shaped probe tagged with AG NCs | 4.4 nM | 10–200 nM | [ | ||
| FRET between CNPs oxide and Ag NCs | 0.4 nM | 1–50 nM | [ | ||
| FRET between DNA Ag NCs and BHQ | 35 pM | 50 pM–5 nM | [ | ||
| DNA/AG NCs probe and Exo III-assisted cyclic amplification | 35 pM | 50 pM- 5 nM | [ | ||
| Fluorescence enhancement of Ag NCs by dimer formation and auxiliary G rich sequence probe | 12 pM | 0.2–700 nM | [ | ||
| Non overlapping emission of different molecular beacon template Ag NCs | 0.12 nM | 0–250 nM | [ | ||
| Different interaction of ss DNA and ds DNA with MoS2 sheet | 5.3 pM | 0.01–0.25 nM | [ | ||
| Fluorescence Polarization | Self-assembly of Au NPs to form the dendric macromolecules | 73 pM | 150 pM- 6 nM | [ | |
| Chemiluminescence | Hybridization chain reaction and AuNPs | 5 fM | 0.02–1 pM | [ | |
| Molecularly Imprinted Polymer and Europium sulfide nano crystals | 0.3 fM | 0.3–3 fM | [ | ||
| Nano plasmonic | SPR biosensing strategy based on dynamic entropy-driven strand displacement reactions and double-layer DNA tetrahedrons | 48 fM | 1 pM–150 nM | [ | |
| SERS biosensing strategy based on hybridization of DNA conjugated on MGTIC/AuNPs | 0.24 pg/ml | 8 pg/ml – 64 ng/ml | [ | ||
| SERS biosensing strategy based on formation of multi metal molecule DNA nanoconjugation | 100 AM | 0–10 pM | [ | ||
| Dinamic Light Scattering (DLS) | Combination of polymerase chain reaction and DLS | 1.8 aM | 10 aM–1.9 pM | [ | |
| Photoelectrochemical | HCR and enzyme catalysis for cascade signal amplification | 11.3 aM | 50 aM–100 pM | [ | |
Comparison of analytical performance (linear range and LOD) of the different nano biosensing systems for detection of HTLV-1.
| Detection Method | Strategy | Limit of Detection | Linear Range | Ref. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electrochemical | Differential Pulse Voltammetry (DPV) | Self-assembly of DNA on Au NPs and magnetic separation | 1.7 pM | 44 pM–2 nM | [ |
| Optical | Fluorescence | CdTe modified DNA probes | 1.95 pg/μl | 10 pg/μl – 0.24 ng/μl | [ |
| FRET between CDs and Fe3O4@Au NPs | 10 nM | 10–320 nM | [ | ||
| CdTe QDs tagged complementary DNA probe | 10 pg/ml | 10 pg/ml – 21 ng/ml | [ | ||
| Hairpin shaped probe tagged with AG NCs | 8.5 nM | 10–200 nM | [ | ||
| Photoelectrochemical | Cascade photoactive materials and triple helix molecular switch | 0.65 fM | 1 fM – 1 nM | [ | |