| Literature DB >> 30348974 |
Mohadeseh Zarei-Ghobadi1,2, Sayed-Hamidreza Mozhgani3,4, Fariba Dashtestani1, Amir Yadegari5, Fatemeh Hakimian1, Mehdi Norouzi2,4, Hedayatollah Ghourchian6.
Abstract
Carbon dots andEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30348974 PMCID: PMC6197194 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-32756-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the detection steps of DNA target.
Figure 2The FT-IR spectra of (A) Fe3O4@Au and (B) CDs.
Figure 3(A)TEM image and (B) DLS analysis of Fe3O4@Au; (C) TEM image and (D) DLS analysis of CDs.
Figure 4(A) XPS survey spectra of CDs, (B) C1s high-resolution XPS spectra, (C) O1s high resolution XPS spectra and (D) N1s high-resolution XPS spectra of CDs.
Figure 5(A) The fluorescence emission spectra of CDs before and after conjugation with probe A. (B) The fluorescence emission spectra of CDs and UV-Vis absorption spectra of Fe3O4@Au solution.
Figure 6The fluorescence emission spectra of CDs-probe A before (control) and after adsorption on the Fe3O4@Au surface.
Figure 7The fluorescence spectra of the CDs-probe A as a function of target concentrations. The inset shows the linear range of the biosensor response.
Figure 8Specificity of the biosensor for human T-lymphotropic virus-1 (HTLV-1) rather than human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV). The concentration of all samples was 544 nM.