Literature DB >> 32488594

Stability of a non-applanating handheld liquid patient interface for femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.

Karl Thomas Boden1, Martina Mariacher2, Kai Januschowski2,3, Katrin Boden2, Annekatrin Rickmann2, Peter Szurman2,3, Berthold Seitz4, Siegfried Mariacher2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A stable and reliable vacuum is crucial for the correct planning and performance of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) in order to avoid complications such as suction loss and cyclorotation. This study investigates, for the first time, the impact of different vacuum levels on the stability of the application of a liquid patient interface for FLACS in view of break-away forces.
METHODS: Break-away forces were measured using a multifunctional material testing machine with a mounted digital manometer. Sixteen porcine eyes were docked to the patient interface of a femtosecond laser platform (FEMTO LDV Z8), and the impact of different vacuum levels between 300 and 500 mbar investigated.
RESULTS: Mean break-away forces for each vacuum level were as follows: 1.78 N (± 0.58 N) for 300 mbar; 2.24 N (± 0.68 N) for 350 mbar; 2.66 N (± 0.68 N) for 400 mbar; 2.86 N (± 0.77 N) for 420 mbar; and 3.49 N (± 0.86 N) for 500 mbar.
CONCLUSION: The stability increases with the vacuum in a nearly linear manner. Vacuum levels higher than 500 mmHg and lower than 350 mmHg are not recommended for FLACS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Break-away forces; Cataracts; FLACS; Laser-assisted cataract surgery; Liquid patient interfaces

Year:  2020        PMID: 32488594     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-020-01450-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  14 in total

1.  Management and outcomes of suction loss during LASIK flap creation with a femtosecond laser.

Authors:  Minoru Tomita; Miyuki Watabe; Tadayuki Nakamura; Nobuo Nakamura; Tadahiko Tsuru; George O Waring
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.

Authors:  Kendall E Donaldson; Rosa Braga-Mele; Florence Cabot; Richard Davidson; Deepinder K Dhaliwal; Rex Hamilton; Mitchell Jackson; Larry Patterson; Karl Stonecipher; Sonia H Yoo
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Comparison of intraocular pressure during the application of a liquid patient interface (FEMTO LDV Z8) for femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery using two different vacuum levels.

Authors:  Martina Ebner; Siegfried Mariacher; Kai Januschowski; Katrin Boden; Anna-Maria Seuthe; Peter Szurman; Karl Thomas Boden
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Clinical outcomes in the first two years of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.

Authors:  Soon-Phaik Chee; Younian Yang; Seng-Ei Ti
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Surgical outcomes and safety of femtosecond laser cataract surgery: a prospective study of 1500 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Timothy V Roberts; Michael Lawless; Shveta J Bali; Chris Hodge; Gerard Sutton
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Intraocular pressure variation during femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery using a fluid-filled interface.

Authors:  Tim Schultz; Ina Conrad-Hengerer; Fritz H Hengerer; H Burkhard Dick
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  Optical patient interface in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: contact corneal applanation versus liquid immersion.

Authors:  Jonathan H Talamo; Philip Gooding; David Angeley; William W Culbertson; Georg Schuele; Daniel Andersen; George Marcellino; Emma Essock-Burns; Juan Batlle; Rafael Feliz; Neil J Friedman; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  [Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery].

Authors:  Karl Boden
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  Suction loss during femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.

Authors:  Tim Schultz; H Burkhard Dick
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 3.351

10.  Successful femtosecond LASIK flap creation despite multiple suction losses.

Authors:  Zeba A Syed; Samir A Melki
Journal:  Digit J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-01-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.