Literature DB >> 23434216

Optical patient interface in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: contact corneal applanation versus liquid immersion.

Jonathan H Talamo1, Philip Gooding, David Angeley, William W Culbertson, Georg Schuele, Daniel Andersen, George Marcellino, Emma Essock-Burns, Juan Batlle, Rafael Feliz, Neil J Friedman, Daniel Palanker.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare 2 optical patient interface designs used for femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.
SETTING: Optimedica Corp., Santa Clara, California, USA, and Centro Laser, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
DESIGN: Experimental and clinical studies.
METHODS: Laser capsulotomy was performed during cataract surgery with a curved contact lens interface (CCL) or a liquid optical immersion interface (LOI). The presence of corneal folds, incomplete capsulotomy, subconjunctival hemorrhage, and eye movement during laser treatment were analyzed using video and optical coherence tomography. The induced rise of intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured in porcine and cadaver eyes.
RESULTS: Corneal folds were identified in 70% of the CCL cohort; 63% of these had areas of incomplete capsulotomies beneath the corneal folds. No corneal folds or incomplete capsulotomies were identified in the LOI cohort. The mean eye movement during capsulotomy creation (1.5 sec) was 50 μm with a CCL and 20 μm with an LOI. The LOI cohort had 36% less subconjunctival hemorrhage than the CCL cohort. During suction, the mean IOP rise was 32.4 mm Hg ± 3.4 (SD) in the CCL group and 17.7 ± 2.1 mm Hg in the LOI group.
CONCLUSIONS: Curved contact interfaces create corneal folds that can lead to incomplete capsulotomy during laser cataract surgery. A liquid interface eliminated corneal folds, improved globe stability, reduced subconjunctival hemorrhage, and lowered IOP rise.
Copyright © 2013 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23434216     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.01.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  26 in total

1.  Morphological changes in the edge structures following femtosecond laser capsulotomy with varied patient interfaces and different energy settings.

Authors:  Thomas Kohnen; Oliver K Klaproth; Marko Ostovic; Fritz H Hengerer; Wolfgang J Mayer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Calculation of ophthalmic viscoelastic device-induced focus shift during femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.

Authors:  Carolina P de Freitas; Florence Cabot; Fabrice Manns; William Culbertson; Sonia H Yoo; Jean-Marie Parel
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 3.  [Perspectives of laser-assisted keratoplasty: current overview and first preliminary results with the picosecond infrared laser (λ = 3 µm)].

Authors:  S J Linke; L Ren; A Frings; J Steinberg; W Wöllmer; T Katz; R Reimer; N O Hansen; N Jowett; G Richard; R J Dwayne Miller
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  [Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery].

Authors:  H B Dick; T Schultz
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with bimanual technique: learning curve for an experienced cataract surgeon.

Authors:  Gian Maria Cavallini; Tommaso Verdina; Michele De Maria; Elisa Fornasari; Elisa Volpini; Luca Campi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Stability of a non-applanating handheld liquid patient interface for femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.

Authors:  Karl Thomas Boden; Martina Mariacher; Kai Januschowski; Katrin Boden; Annekatrin Rickmann; Peter Szurman; Berthold Seitz; Siegfried Mariacher
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  [Femtosecond laser-assisted lens surgery depending on interface design and laser pulse energy: results of the first 200 cases].

Authors:  W J Mayer; O K Klaproth; M Ostovic; F H Hengerer; T Kohnen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  Intracameral bleeding during femtolaser assisted cataract surgery: A case report.

Authors:  Anagha Heroor; Vikram Vaidee
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2022-07-08

9.  Comparison of intra-ocular pressure changes with liquid or flat applanation interfaces in a femtosecond laser platform.

Authors:  G P Williams; H P Ang; B L George; Y C Liu; G Peh; L Izquierdo; D T Tan; J S Mehta
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Intraocular Pressure Reduction after Femtolaser Assisted Cataract Surgery and Its Association with the Use of Ultrasound.

Authors:  Hana Abouzeid; Walter Ferrini; Murielle Bochud
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.