Literature DB >> 32478978

An Integrated Review of Uterine Activity Monitoring for Evaluating Labor Dystocia.

Katherine J Kissler1, Nancy K Lowe1, Teri L Hernandez1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Labor dystocia is the most common cause of cesarean birth in the United States, yet how dystocia develops during labor remains elusive. Uterine activity monitoring has significant potential for advancing our understanding of labor dystocia. While evaluating contraction frequency and amplitude is a common component of labor dystocia management, the literature describing the relationship between measures of uterine activity and labor dystocia is heterogeneous and has not been synthesized to identify the best methods for use in clinical investigation.
METHODS: We conducted a literature search for original research exploring the relationship between uterine activity and labor dystocia published between 2000 and 2019. Included articles were critically reviewed and synthesized.
RESULTS: Across 11 identified studies, investigators employed 3 different techniques for monitoring uterine activity and 9 different measures were employed. Uterine activity measures, including Montevideo units, uterine electromyography power density spectrum and sample entropy, and the fall-to-rise ratio of contraction shape, detected patterns associated with labor dystocia or cesarean birth. DISCUSSION: The use of multiple regression with clinical covariates and a uterine activity measure increased the accuracy of predicting cesarean delivery. Uterine electromyography may be especially useful to evaluate labor dystocia phenotypes to differentiate uterine muscle fatigue from understimulation and lead to algorithms for increased precision in the diagnosis of labor dystocia and innovative approaches to treatment.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American College of Nurse Midwives (ACNM).

Entities:  

Keywords:  cesarean birth; intrapartum care; labor: first stage; normal birth; obstetric complications; quantitative research

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32478978      PMCID: PMC7875314          DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health        ISSN: 1526-9523            Impact factor:   2.388


  26 in total

1.  Predicting term and preterm delivery with transabdominal uterine electromyography.

Authors:  William L Maner; Robert E Garfield; Holger Maul; Gayle Olson; George Saade
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Aaron B Caughey; Alison G Cahill; Jeanne-Marie Guise; Dwight J Rouse
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Births: Final Data for 2018.

Authors:  Joyce A Martin; Brady E Hamilton; Michelle J K Osterman; Anne K Driscoll
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2019-11

4.  Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate.

Authors:  Emma L Barber; Lisbet S Lundsberg; Kathleen Belanger; Christian M Pettker; Edmund F Funai; Jessica L Illuzzi
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Study of correlation between maternal fatigue and uterine contraction pattern in the active phase of labour.

Authors:  Samira Ebrahimzadeh; Nahid Golmakani; Maryam Kabirian; Mohhamad T Shakeri
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 3.036

6.  Uterine contraction pattern as a predictor of the mode of delivery.

Authors:  Lawrence W Oppenheimer; Elaine S Bland; André Dabrowski; Paul Holmes; Omid McDonald; Shi Wu Wen
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.521

7.  Uterine electromyography for identification of first-stage labor arrest in term nulliparous women with spontaneous onset of labor.

Authors:  Blanka Vasak; Elisabeth M Graatsma; Elske Hekman-Drost; Marinus J Eijkemans; Jules H Schagen van Leeuwen; Gerard H Visser; Benoit C Jacod
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Outcomes after internal versus external tocodynamometry for monitoring labor.

Authors:  Jannet J H Bakker; Corine J M Verhoeven; Petra F Janssen; Jan M van Lith; Elisabeth D van Oudgaarden; Kitty W M Bloemenkamp; Dimitri N M Papatsonis; Ben Willem J Mol; Joris A M van der Post
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  What do we know about what happens to myometrial function as women age?

Authors:  Sarah Arrowsmith; Hayley Robinson; Karen Noble; Susan Wray
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 2.698

10.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Mucosa-interfacing electronics.

Authors:  Kewang Nan; Vivian R Feig; Binbin Ying; Julia G Howarth; Ziliang Kang; Yiyuan Yang; Giovanni Traverso
Journal:  Nat Rev Mater       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 76.679

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.