| Literature DB >> 32474709 |
Jara E Jonker1, Hendrik S Hofker2, Monika Trzpis3, Paul M A Broens3,4.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aims to analyze the quality of life in patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and to investigate the association between height and type of the anastomosis, the number of stage procedures and age, and the fecal continence outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: Fecal continence; Hand-sewn anastomosis; Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis; Quality of life; Stage procedures; Stapled anastomosis
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32474709 PMCID: PMC7415023 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03626-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis ISSN: 0179-1958 Impact factor: 2.571
Fig. 1Flowchart of the total number of patients included and the number of patients included in the questionnaire analysis
Comparison between patients who completed the questionnaire and patients for whom no questionnaire was available
| Total group ( | Questionnaire ( | No questionnaire ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demographics | |||||||
| Sex | 133 | 65 | 68 | ||||
| Men | 77 (58%) | 40 (62%) | 37 (54%) | 0.48 | |||
| Women | 56 (42%) | 25 (38%) | 31 (46%) | ||||
| Mean age at IPAA (years) | 133 | 36 ± 13 | 65 | 40 ± 12 | 68 | 32 ± 13 | |
| Mean BMI (min-max) | 94 | 25 ± 4.2 | 59 | 25 ± 3.0 | 35 | 24 ± 5.7 | 0.50 |
| Surgical indication | 133 | 65 | 68 | ||||
| FAP | 12 (9%) | 3 (5%) | 9 (13%) | 0.26 | |||
| Active IBD | 112 (84%) | 56 (86%) | 56 (82%) | ||||
| IBD dysplasia | 4 (3%) | 3 (5%) | 1 (1%) | ||||
| Other | 5 (4%) | 3 (5%) | 2 (3%) | ||||
| Surgical characteristics | |||||||
| Strategy | 133 | 65 | 68 | ||||
| 1-stage procedure | 7 (5%) | 3 (5%) | 4 (6%) | 0.86 | |||
| 2-stage procedure | 37 | 20 | 17 | ||||
| With ileostomy | 17 (13%) | 10 (15%) | 7 (10%) | ||||
| Without ileostomy | 20 (15%) | 10 (15%) | 10 (15%) | ||||
| 3-stage procedure | 89 (67%) | 42 (65%) | 47 (69%) | ||||
| Technique proctocolectomy with IPAA | 128 | 63 | 65 | ||||
| Open | 90 (70%) | 44 (70%) | 46 (71%) | 1.00 | |||
| Laparoscopic | 38 (30%) | 19 (30%) | 19 (29%) | ||||
| Median distance anastomosis from dentate line in cm (min-max) | 101 | 2.0 (0.0–5.5) | 51 | 2.0 (0.0–5.5) | 50 | 2.0 (0.0–5.0) | 0.56 |
| Anastomosis technique | 125 | 63 | 62 | ||||
| Hand-sewn | 25 (20%) | 11 (17%) | 14 (23%) | 0.51 | |||
| Stapled | 100 (80%) | 52 (83%) | 48 (77%) | ||||
| Type of pouch | 131 | 64 | 67 | ||||
| J-pouch | 120 (92%) | 61 (95%) | 59 (88%) | 0.21 | |||
| S-pouch | 11 (8%) | 3 (5%) | 8 (12%) | ||||
| Median length pouch in cm (min-max) | 79 | 15 (8–21) | 37 | 15 (8.0–20) | 42 | 15 (10–21) | 0.35 |
| Rectum eversion | 124 | 62 | 62 | ||||
| Yes | 35 (28%) | 17 (27%) | 18 (29%) | 1.00 | |||
| No | 89 (72%) | 45 (73%) | 44 (71%) | ||||
| Complications IPAA | |||||||
| Clavien Dindo grades | 132 | 65 | 67 | ||||
| Zero | 56 (42%) | 29 (45%) | 27 (40%) | 0.83 | |||
| I | 35 (27%) | 16 (25%) | 19 (28%) | ||||
| II | 19 (14%) | 11 (17%) | 8 (12%) | ||||
| IIIa | 2 (2%) | 1 (2%) | 1 (2%) | ||||
| IIIb | 20 (15%) | 8 (12%) | 12 (18%) | ||||
| Anastomotic leakage | 127 | 9 (7%) | 64 | 4 (6%) | 63 | 5 (7%) | 0.74 |
| During pouch surgery | 4 (3%) | 1 (2%) | 3 (4%) | ||||
| During ileostomy surgery | 5 (4%) | 3 (5%) | 2 (3%) | ||||
IPAA, ileal pouch-anal anastomosis; FAP, familial adenomatous polyposis; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease
Fig. 2Count of the different stage procedures before 2005 and from 2005 to 2016. Abbreviation: IPAA, ileal pouch-anal anastomosis
Fig. 3a Scatterplot of Wexner scores and the time between surgery and completing the questionnaire in years. b Scatterplot of Wexner score and the age at IPAA surgery in years. Abbreviation: IPAA, ileal pouch-anal anastomosis
Fig. 4Radar chart of the quality of life of patients with IPAA. Means are given. Statistical significance was shown as follows: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01. a Hand-sewn anastomosis versus stapled anastomosis. b Overall incontinent versus continent. c Soiling versus no soiling. d Liquid stool incontinence versus no liquid stool incontinence
Fig. 5Boxplot of the Wexner score for the group with mucosectomy followed by a hand-sewn anastomosis and the group with a stapled anastomosis without mucosectomy
Fig. 6Scatterplot of the Wexner score and the height of the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in centimeters