M Rosie Shrout1, Megan E Renna2, Annelise A Madison3, Catherine M Alfano4, Stephen P Povoski5, Adele M Lipari5, Doreen M Agnese5, Lisa D Yee6, William E Carson5, Janice K Kiecolt-Glaser7. 1. Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA. Electronic address: Rosie.Shrout@osumc.edu. 2. Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA. 3. Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. 4. American Cancer Society, Inc., Atlanta, GA, USA. 5. Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA. 6. Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA. 7. Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer survivors with elevated inflammation have a greater risk for cancer recurrence, premature mortality, and comorbid disease development. The psychological stress survivors experience when confronted with a breast cancer diagnosis and cancer treatment can heighten inflammation. Identifying factors that reduce stress and inflammation could lead to improvements in survivors' long-term health. Accordingly, this study examined the health-enhancing effects of romantic relationships-a key health determinant-on breast cancer survivors' stress and inflammation. METHODS: Breast cancer survivors (n = 139, stages 0-IIIC) completed a baseline visit before treatment and two follow-up visits 6 and 18 months after treatment ended. Women completed self-report questionnaires assessing their romantic relationship satisfaction and perceived stress, and they provided a blood sample for serum markers of inflammation at each visit. The longitudinal design allowed for examination within and between survivors. We conducted multilevel mediation analyses to assess how changes in survivors' relationship satisfaction were related to changes in stress and inflammation from visit to visit (i.e., within-person effects), as well as how the average effects of relationship satisfaction were associated with average stress and inflammation levels throughout the study (i.e., between-person effects). RESULTS: At the within-person level, at visits in which survivors were more satisfied with their relationships, they also perceived less stress, which in turn was related to lower than their own average levels of serum C-reactive protein and proinflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6, and interleukin-1β). At the between-person level, survivors who had greater relationship satisfaction throughout the study had lower perceived stress, which was linked to lower levels of inflammation. CONCLUSION: Breast cancer survivors in satisfying romantic relationships felt less stressed and in turn had lower inflammation throughout cancer treatment. This study illustrates the utility of a within-person approach to not only consider the average effects of relationship satisfaction, but also how changes in their own relationship satisfaction impact stress and inflammation over time. Our findings demonstrate important psychological and immunological pathways through which satisfying relationships may promote breast cancer survivors' long-term health.
BACKGROUND:Breast cancer survivors with elevated inflammation have a greater risk for cancer recurrence, premature mortality, and comorbid disease development. The psychological stress survivors experience when confronted with a breast cancer diagnosis and cancer treatment can heighten inflammation. Identifying factors that reduce stress and inflammation could lead to improvements in survivors' long-term health. Accordingly, this study examined the health-enhancing effects of romantic relationships-a key health determinant-on breast cancer survivors' stress and inflammation. METHODS:Breast cancer survivors (n = 139, stages 0-IIIC) completed a baseline visit before treatment and two follow-up visits 6 and 18 months after treatment ended. Women completed self-report questionnaires assessing their romantic relationship satisfaction and perceived stress, and they provided a blood sample for serum markers of inflammation at each visit. The longitudinal design allowed for examination within and between survivors. We conducted multilevel mediation analyses to assess how changes in survivors' relationship satisfaction were related to changes in stress and inflammation from visit to visit (i.e., within-person effects), as well as how the average effects of relationship satisfaction were associated with average stress and inflammation levels throughout the study (i.e., between-person effects). RESULTS: At the within-person level, at visits in which survivors were more satisfied with their relationships, they also perceived less stress, which in turn was related to lower than their own average levels of serum C-reactive protein and proinflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6, and interleukin-1β). At the between-person level, survivors who had greater relationship satisfaction throughout the study had lower perceived stress, which was linked to lower levels of inflammation. CONCLUSION:Breast cancer survivors in satisfying romantic relationships felt less stressed and in turn had lower inflammation throughout cancer treatment. This study illustrates the utility of a within-person approach to not only consider the average effects of relationship satisfaction, but also how changes in their own relationship satisfaction impact stress and inflammation over time. Our findings demonstrate important psychological and immunological pathways through which satisfying relationships may promote breast cancer survivors' long-term health.
Authors: Anna C Phillips; Douglas Carroll; Victoria E Burns; Christopher Ring; John Macleod; Mark Drayson Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2005-09-27 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Lisa M Jaremka; Ronald Glaser; William B Malarkey; Janice K Kiecolt-Glaser Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2013-07-20 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Jennifer E Graham; Ronald Glaser; Timothy J Loving; William B Malarkey; Jeffrey R Stowell; Janice K Kiecolt-Glaser Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Barbara L Andersen; Robert J DeRubeis; Barry S Berman; Jessie Gruman; Victoria L Champion; Mary Jane Massie; Jimmie C Holland; Ann H Partridge; Kate Bak; Mark R Somerfield; Julia H Rowland Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-04-14 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Megan E Renna; M Rosie Shrout; Annelise A Madison; Catherine M Alfano; Stephen P Povoski; Adele M Lipari; Doreen M Agnese; William E Carson; Janice K Kiecolt-Glaser Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2020-09-09 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: M Rosie Shrout; Annelise A Madison; Megan E Renna; Catherine M Alfano; Stephen P Povoski; Adele M Lipari; Doreen M Agnese; William E Carson; William B Malarkey; Michael T Bailey; Janice K Kiecolt-Glaser Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2021-11-19 Impact factor: 19.227
Authors: Megan E Renna; M Rosie Shrout; Annelise A Madison; Lisa M Jaremka; Catherine M Alfano; Stephen P Povoski; Doreen M Agnese; William E Carson; Janice K Kiecolt-Glaser Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Minjie Li; Carmen W H Chan; Kai Chow Choi; Hui Zhang; Shek Nam Ng; Lina Huang; Mengyue Zhang; Wenqian Zhao Journal: Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs Date: 2021-12-25