Literature DB >> 25242854

Cancer-specific Relationship Awareness, Relationship Communication, and Intimacy Among Couples Coping with Early Stage Breast Cancer.

Sharon L Manne1, Scott Siegel2, Deborah Kashy3, Carolyn J Heckman4.   

Abstract

If couples can maintain normalcy and quality in their relationship during the cancer experience, they may experience greater relational intimacy. Cancer-specific relationship awareness, which is an attitude defined as partners focusing on the relationship and thinking about how they might maintain normalcy and cope with cancer as a couple or "team", is one factor that may help couples achieve this goal. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the associations between cancer-specific relationship awareness, cancer-specific communication (i.e., talking about cancer's impact on the relationship, disclosure, and responsiveness to partner disclosure), and relationship intimacy and evaluate whether relationship communication mediated the association between relationship awareness and intimacy. Two hundred fifty four women diagnosed with early stage breast cancer and their partners completed measures of cancer-specific relationship awareness, relationship talk, self-and perceived partner disclosure, perceived partner responsiveness, and relationship intimacy. Results indicated that patients and spouses who were higher in cancer-specific relationship awareness engaged in more relationship talk, reported higher levels of self-disclosure, and perceived that their partner disclosed more. Their partners reported that they were more responsive to disclosures. Relationship talk and perceived partner responsiveness mediated the association between cancer-specific relationship awareness and intimacy. Helping couples consider ways they can maintain normalcy and quality during the cancer experience and framing coping with cancer as a "team" effort may facilitate better communication and ultimately enhance relationship intimacy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Relationship awareness; breast cancer; couples; intimacy; relationship communication; relationship talk

Year:  2014        PMID: 25242854      PMCID: PMC4165555          DOI: 10.1177/0265407513494950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Soc Pers Relat        ISSN: 0265-4075


  38 in total

1.  Attributions for spousal behavior in relation to criticism and perceived criticism.

Authors:  Kristina M Peterson; David A Smith
Journal:  Behav Ther       Date:  2011-05-12

2.  Intimacy as an interpersonal process: the importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges.

Authors:  J P Laurenceau; L F Barrett; P R Pietromonaco
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1998-05

3.  The role of attributions in the development of dating relationships.

Authors:  G J Fletcher; F D Fincham; L Cramer; N Heron
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1987-09

Review 4.  The impact of breast cancer on the partner 18 months after diagnosis.

Authors:  E H Zahlis; M E Shands
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.315

5.  Cancer-related concerns of spouses of women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Kristin A Fletcher; Frances Marcus Lewis; Mel R Haberman
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  Impact of perceived cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Diane Von Ah; Barbara Habermann; Janet S Carpenter; Brandy L Schneider
Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 2.398

7.  Effects of relationship maintenance on psychological distress and dyadic adjustment among couples coping with lung cancer.

Authors:  Hoda Badr; Cindy L Carmack Taylor
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  Locating relationship and communication issues among stressors associated with breast cancer.

Authors:  Kirsten M Weber; Denise Haunani Solomon
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2008-11

Review 9.  Cancer-related lymphedema risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, and impact: a review.

Authors:  Electra D Paskett; Julie A Dean; Jill M Oliveri; J Phil Harrop
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Intimacy and relationship processes in couples' psychosocial adaptation to cancer.

Authors:  Sharon Manne; Hoda Badr
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  11 in total

1.  The Dyadic Communicative Resilience Scale (DCRS): scale development, reliability, and validity.

Authors:  Skye Chernichky-Karcher; Maria K Venetis; Helen Lillie
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  The closer 'We' are, the stronger 'I' am: the impact of couple identity on cancer coping self-efficacy.

Authors:  Saunia Ahmad; Karen Fergus; Kristina Shatokhina; Sandra Gardner
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2016-11-15

3.  Relationship satisfaction predicts lower stress and inflammation in breast cancer survivors: A longitudinal study of within-person and between-person effects.

Authors:  M Rosie Shrout; Megan E Renna; Annelise A Madison; Catherine M Alfano; Stephen P Povoski; Adele M Lipari; Doreen M Agnese; Lisa D Yee; William E Carson; Janice K Kiecolt-Glaser
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 4.905

Review 4.  Intimate Relationships Affected by Breast Cancer: Interventions for Couples.

Authors:  Tanja Zimmermann
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Holding back, intimacy, and psychological and relationship outcomes among couples coping with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sharon L Manne; David Kissane; Talia Zaider; Deborah Kashy; David Lee; Carolyn Heckman; Shannon Myers Virtue
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2015-07-20

6.  Effectiveness of psychoeducation intervention among women with gynecological cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Atun Raudotul Ma'rifah; Yati Afiyanti; Mega Hasanul Huda; Roselyn Chipojola; Yelmi Reni Putri; M A Tantawi Nasution
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.359

7.  An examination of dyadic changes in optimism and physical health over time.

Authors:  William J Chopik; Eric S Kim; Jacqui Smith
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  In-home conversations of couples with advanced cancer: Support has its costs.

Authors:  Maija Reblin; Amy K Otto; Dana Ketcher; Susan T Vadaparampil; Lee Ellington; Richard E Heyman
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Social support and social control in the context of cancer patients' exercise: A pilot study.

Authors:  Nadine Ungar; Joachim Wiskemann; Mareike Weißmann; Annika Knoll; Karen Steindorf; Monika Sieverding
Journal:  Health Psychol Open       Date:  2016-12-01

10.  Dyadic Coping of Kidney Transplant Recipients and Their Partners: Sex and Role Differences.

Authors:  Daria Tkachenko; Laura Franke; Luisa Peters; Mario Schiffer; Tanja Zimmermann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-02-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.