Literature DB >> 32467973

Effects of mood and aging on keystroke dynamics metadata and their diurnal patterns in a large open-science sample: A BiAffect iOS study.

Claudia Vesel1, Homa Rashidisabet1, John Zulueta2, Jonathan P Stange2, Jennifer Duffecy2, Faraz Hussain2, Andrea Piscitello3, John Bark2, Scott A Langenecker4, Shannon Young5, Erin Mounts5, Larsson Omberg5, Peter C Nelson3, Raeanne C Moore6, Dave Koziol7, Keith Bourne7, Casey C Bennett8,9, Olusola Ajilore2, Alexander P Demos10, Alex Leow1,2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Ubiquitous technologies can be leveraged to construct ecologically relevant metrics that complement traditional psychological assessments. This study aims to determine the feasibility of smartphone-derived real-world keyboard metadata to serve as digital biomarkers of mood.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: BiAffect, a real-world observation study based on a freely available iPhone app, allowed the unobtrusive collection of typing metadata through a custom virtual keyboard that replaces the default keyboard. User demographics and self-reports for depression severity (Patient Health Questionnaire-8) were also collected. Using >14 million keypresses from 250 users who reported demographic information and a subset of 147 users who additionally completed at least 1 Patient Health Questionnaire, we employed hierarchical growth curve mixed-effects models to capture the effects of mood, demographics, and time of day on keyboard metadata.
RESULTS: We analyzed 86 541 typing sessions associated with a total of 543 Patient Health Questionnaires. Results showed that more severe depression relates to more variable typing speed (P < .001), shorter session duration (P < .001), and lower accuracy (P < .05). Additionally, typing speed and variability exhibit a diurnal pattern, being fastest and least variable at midday. Older users exhibit slower and more variable typing, as well as more pronounced slowing in the evening. The effects of aging and time of day did not impact the relationship of mood to typing variables and were recapitulated in the 250-user group.
CONCLUSIONS: Keystroke dynamics, unobtrusively collected in the real world, are significantly associated with mood despite diurnal patterns and effects of age, and thus could serve as a foundation for constructing digital biomarkers.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  keystroke dynamics; mHealth; mood; smartphone applications in health

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32467973      PMCID: PMC7647317          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  31 in total

Review 1.  Using ambulatory assessment to measure dynamic risk processes in affective disorders.

Authors:  Jonathan P Stange; Evan M Kleiman; Robin J Mermelstein; Timothy J Trull
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 4.839

2.  Exploring the within-person coupling of sleep and cognition in older African Americans.

Authors:  Alyssa A Gamaldo; Jason C Allaire; Keith E Whitfield
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2010-12

3.  Let your fingers do the talking: Passive typing instability predicts future mood outcomes.

Authors:  Jonathan P Stange; John Zulueta; Scott A Langenecker; Kelly A Ryan; Andrea Piscitello; Jenna Duffecy; Melvin G McInnis; Pete Nelson; Olusola Ajilore; Alex Leow
Journal:  Bipolar Disord       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 6.744

Review 4.  Current limitations of neuropsychological tests and assessment procedures.

Authors:  Diane Howieson
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.535

5.  The identification of depression and the coverage of antidepressant drug prescriptions in Italian general practice.

Authors:  Cesario Bellantuono; Maria Angela Mazzi; Michele Tansella; Raffaella Rizzo; David Goldberg
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.839

6.  Intraindividual variability across cognitive domains: investigation of dispersion levels and performance profiles in older adults.

Authors:  Jennifer V Hilborn; Esther Strauss; David F Hultsch; Michael A Hunter
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.475

7.  Computer mouse movement patterns: A potential marker of mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Adriana Seelye; Stuart Hagler; Nora Mattek; Diane B Howieson; Katherine Wild; Hiroko H Dodge; Jeffrey A Kaye
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (Amst)       Date:  2015-10-19

8.  Why Do Mania and Suicide Occur Most Often in the Spring?

Authors:  Chul-Hyun Cho; Heon-Jeong Lee
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 2.505

9.  Can you detect early dementia from an email? A proof of principle study of daily computer use to detect cognitive and functional decline.

Authors:  G Stringer; S Couth; L J E Brown; D Montaldi; A Gledson; J Mellor; A Sutcliffe; P Sawyer; J Keane; C Bull; X Zeng; P Rayson; I Leroi
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.485

10.  Predicting Mood Disturbance Severity with Mobile Phone Keystroke Metadata: A BiAffect Digital Phenotyping Study.

Authors:  John Zulueta; Andrea Piscitello; Mladen Rasic; Rebecca Easter; Pallavi Babu; Scott A Langenecker; Melvin McInnis; Olusola Ajilore; Peter C Nelson; Kelly Ryan; Alex Leow
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  11 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of keystroke dynamics as digital biomarkers for fine motor decline in neuropsychiatric disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hessa Alfalahi; Ahsan H Khandoker; Nayeefa Chowdhury; Dimitrios Iakovakis; Sofia B Dias; K Ray Chaudhuri; Leontios J Hadjileontiadis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Future directions for sleep and cognition research in at-risk older adults.

Authors:  Yeonsu Song; Laura M Campbell; Raeanne C Moore
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 7.191

Review 3.  Affective Computing for Late-Life Mood and Cognitive Disorders.

Authors:  Erin Smith; Eric A Storch; Ipsit Vahia; Stephen T C Wong; Helen Lavretsky; Jeffrey L Cummings; Harris A Eyre
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 4.157

4.  The Effects of Bipolar Disorder Risk on a Mobile Phone Keystroke Dynamics Based Biomarker of Brain Age.

Authors:  John Zulueta; Alexander Pantelis Demos; Claudia Vesel; Mindy Ross; Andrea Piscitello; Faraz Hussain; Scott A Langenecker; Melvin McInnis; Peter Nelson; Kelly Ryan; Alex Leow; Olusola Ajilore
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 4.157

5.  Naturalistic smartphone keyboard typing reflects processing speed and executive function.

Authors:  Mindy K Ross; Alexander P Demos; John Zulueta; Andrea Piscitello; Scott A Langenecker; Melvin McInnis; Olusola Ajilore; Peter C Nelson; Kelly A Ryan; Alex Leow
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 2.708

6.  Using absolutist word frequency from online searches to measure population mental health dynamics.

Authors:  Jais Adam-Troian; Eric Bonetto; Thomas Arciszewski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  A model of healthy aging based on smartphone interactions reveals advanced behavioral age in neurological disease.

Authors:  Enea Ceolini; Iris Brunner; Johanna Bunschoten; Marian H J M Majoie; Roland D Thijs; Arko Ghosh
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-08-05

8.  Capturing Cognitive Aging in Vivo: Application of a Neuropsychological Framework for Emerging Digital Tools.

Authors:  Katherine Hackett; Tania Giovannetti
Journal:  JMIR Aging       Date:  2022-09-07

9.  Temporal clusters of age-related behavioral alterations captured in smartphone touchscreen interactions.

Authors:  Enea Ceolini; Ruchella Kock; Guido P H Band; Gijsbert Stoet; Arko Ghosh
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-08-05

10.  Disentangling personalized treatment effects from "time-of-the-day" confounding in mobile health studies.

Authors:  Elias Chaibub Neto; Thanneer M Perumal; Abhishek Pratap; Aryton Tediarjo; Brian M Bot; Lara Mangravite; Larsson Omberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.