Diane Howieson1. 1. a Department of Neurology , Oregon Health & Science University , Portland , OR , USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Neuropsychological tests are used for a wide variety of purposes: assessing basic cognitive abilities or disabilities; determining cognitive patterns associated with brain disorders or injury; exploring brain-behavior relationships; and, in some cases, addressing psycho-legal issues. This paper will focus on the limitations of current neuropsychological tests for these purposes. METHOD: Current limits of neuropsychological tests and assessment procedures are reviewed and recommendations for improvements are made. The relationship between the conceptual basis of neuropsychological tests and modern theories of brain functional organization is discussed. In addition, psycho-legal concerns are briefly outlined. CONCLUSIONS: Existing tests and techniques can be improved. Normative data for some neuropsychological tests are based on small samples or have limited validity or reliability data. A variety of neuropsychological tests are available but particular cognitive domains are underrepresented, particularly those involving high-level cognitive skills and social skills. Progress is being made in the availability of tests in multiple languages, but the restricted range of languages and cultural influences demands more attention. Standard test procedures often deviate from real-world activities. In this modern age, some tests have become too familiar because of the Internet. Understanding of complex neural networks activated by cognitive tasks is only beginning to be appreciated. Procedures for determining psycho-legal issues need improvements in some areas.
OBJECTIVE: Neuropsychological tests are used for a wide variety of purposes: assessing basic cognitive abilities or disabilities; determining cognitive patterns associated with brain disorders or injury; exploring brain-behavior relationships; and, in some cases, addressing psycho-legal issues. This paper will focus on the limitations of current neuropsychological tests for these purposes. METHOD: Current limits of neuropsychological tests and assessment procedures are reviewed and recommendations for improvements are made. The relationship between the conceptual basis of neuropsychological tests and modern theories of brain functional organization is discussed. In addition, psycho-legal concerns are briefly outlined. CONCLUSIONS: Existing tests and techniques can be improved. Normative data for some neuropsychological tests are based on small samples or have limited validity or reliability data. A variety of neuropsychological tests are available but particular cognitive domains are underrepresented, particularly those involving high-level cognitive skills and social skills. Progress is being made in the availability of tests in multiple languages, but the restricted range of languages and cultural influences demands more attention. Standard test procedures often deviate from real-world activities. In this modern age, some tests have become too familiar because of the Internet. Understanding of complex neural networks activated by cognitive tasks is only beginning to be appreciated. Procedures for determining psycho-legal issues need improvements in some areas.
Authors: Claudia Vesel; Homa Rashidisabet; John Zulueta; Jonathan P Stange; Jennifer Duffecy; Faraz Hussain; Andrea Piscitello; John Bark; Scott A Langenecker; Shannon Young; Erin Mounts; Larsson Omberg; Peter C Nelson; Raeanne C Moore; Dave Koziol; Keith Bourne; Casey C Bennett; Olusola Ajilore; Alexander P Demos; Alex Leow Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Allison P Fisher; Lisa M Gies; Leah Chapman; Jessica M Aguilar; Keith Owen Yeates; H Gerry Taylor; Shari L Wade Journal: Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2020-12-29 Impact factor: 4.373
Authors: Melissa Treviño; Xiaoshu Zhu; Yi Yi Lu; Luke S Scheuer; Eliza Passell; Grace C Huang; Laura T Germine; Todd S Horowitz Journal: Cogn Res Princ Implic Date: 2021-07-22
Authors: Shawn M McClintock; Lex Minto; David A Denney; K Chase Bailey; C Munro Cullum; Vonetta M Dotson Journal: Curr Psychiatry Rep Date: 2021-07-13 Impact factor: 8.081
Authors: Laura M Campbell; Emily W Paolillo; Anne Heaton; Bin Tang; Colin A Depp; Eric Granholm; Robert K Heaton; Joel Swendsen; David J Moore; Raeanne C Moore Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2020-09-24 Impact factor: 4.773