N Jiang1, J Li2, C M Tian1. 1. The Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China. 2. General Station of Forest Pest Management, State Forestry Administration, Shenyang 110034, China.
Abstract
Arthrinium species are presently recognised based on a combination of morphological characteristics and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequence data. In the present study fresh Arthrinium specimens from bamboo and reed plants were collected in China. Morphological comparison and phylogenetic analyses were subsequently performed for species identification. From the results obtained two new species, Arthrinium gaoyouense and A. qinlingense are proposed, and three known species, Arthrinium arundinis, A. paraphaeospermum and A. yunnanum are identified based on morphological characteristics from the host and published DNA sequence data.
Arthrinium species are presently recognised based on a combination of morphological characteristics and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequence data. In the present study fresh Arthrinium specimens from bamboo and reed plants were collected in China. Morphological comparison and phylogenetic analyses were subsequently performed for species identification. From the results obtained two new species, Arthrinium gaoyouense and A. qinlingense are proposed, and three known species, Arthrinium arundinis, A. paraphaeospermum and A. yunnanum are identified based on morphological characteristics from the host and published DNA sequence data.
Arthrinium (Kunze 1817) is a globally distributed genus inhabiting a wide range of hosts and substrates, including air, soil debris, plants, lichens, marine algae (Agut & Calvo 2004, Senanayake , Dai ), and even human tissues (Sharma ). Although Arthrinium species have been commonly reported as saprophytes on different plant substrates (Agut & Calvo 2004, Crous & Groenewald 2013), the genus also includes phytopathogenic species, namely A. arundinis causing kernel blight of barley in America, A. sacchari causing damping-off of wheat in Canada, and A. phaeospermum causing culm rot of bamboos in China (Martínez-Cano , Mavragani , Li ).Bamboo and reed plants are known for their economic and cultural significance in China. They are used as building materials, food sources, and in various raw products. Culm rot is a common disease in bamboo and reed forests, and Arthrinium is thought to be the causal agent (Zhang , Ma , Hu ). Recent studies indicated that there is a rich species diversity of Arthrinium on bamboo plants in China (Dai , Dai ). More than 17 Arthrinium species have been reported from these host plants (Crous & Groenewald 2013, Senanayake , Dai , Dai ). However, taxonomic work of Arthrinium species on bamboo and reeds is still largely lacking in China, because the hosts are widely distributed, and have never been comprehensively surveyed.The genus Arthrinium was first described in 1817 with numerous generic synonyms, namely Apiospora, Pteroconium and Scyphospora (Kunze 1817, Crous & Groenewald 2013, Réblová ). In agreement with Crous & Groenewald (2013) and Réblová , the generic name Arthrinium is recommended for use, as Arthrinium (1817) was proposed earlier than Apiospora (1875), Pteroconium (1892) and Scyphospora (1928), and is the most widely used of these generic names.The asexual morph of Arthrinium species can be easily recognised based on its dark, aseptate, lenticular conidia with a hyaline rim or germ slit (Singh ). However, identification of Arthrinium to species level is not easy with only the asexual morph because of their relatively conserved morphology. Molecular data and phylogenetic analysis have thus in recent years been used to identify Arthrinium species (Crous & Groenewald 2013, Dai , Dai ), making it possible to distinguish closely related taxa.During our Arthrinium survey conducted in 2017, 12 fresh specimens were collected from Jiangsu, Shaanxi and Shandong Provinces in China. These specimens were identified to five Arthrinium species based on their conidial characteristics and ITS sequence data. Thus, three known species and two new species are described in the present study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Isolates and morphology
In our study, 10 fresh specimens of Arthrinium spp. were collected from dead culms of bamboo plants, and two from live culms of reeds in China. Single conidial isolates were acquired following the method of Chomnunti , by spreading the conidial suspension on the surface of 1.8 % potato dextrose agar (PDA media). After inoculation, agar plates were incubated at 25 °C to induce spore germination, which usually takes 48 h. Single germinating spores or single hyphal stands were transferred to clean plates under a dissecting microscope with a sterile needle. Species identification was based on morphological features of the fruiting bodies produced on infected plant tissues, supplemented by culture characteristics. Hence, cross-sections were prepared by hand using a double-edge blade. More than 20 fruiting bodies were sectioned, and 50 spores were selected randomly for measurement using a Leica compound microscope (LM, DM 2500). Specimens and isolates are deposited in the Museum of Beijing Forestry University (BJFC). Axenic cultures are maintained in the China Forestry Culture Collection Center (CFCC).
DNA amplification, sequencing and phylogeny
Genomic DNA was extracted from 7-d-old mycelium grown on PDA with cellophane using a modified CTAB method (Doyle & Doyle 1990). ITS5 and ITS4 (White et al. 1990), EF1-728F (Carbone & Kohn 1999) and EF-2 (O’Donnell et al. 1998) and T1 (O’Donnell & Cigelnik 1997) and Bt-2b (Glass & Donaldson 1995) primers were used for the amplification of internal transcribed spacers (ITS), translation elongation factor 1-alpha (TEF) and the beta-tubulin gene region (TUB) respectively. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification was carried out following Crous & Groenewald (2013). The PCR amplification products were estimated visually by electrophoresis in 2 % agarose gels. DNA sequencing was performed using an ABI PRISM® 3730xl DNA Analyzer with BigDye® Terminater Kit v. 3.1 (Invitrogen) at the Shanghai Invitrogen Biological Technology Company Limited (Beijing, China).
DNA sequence analysis
The new sequences generated in this study, and the reference sequences of all Arthrinium isolates selected from recent studies, were included in the phylogenetic analyses (Table 1). Seiridium phylicae (CPC 19965) was used as outgroup (Dai ). These sequences were aligned with MAFFT v. 7 (Katoh & Standley 2013) and manually adjusted. Phylogenetic analyses were performed on ITS, TEF and TUB sequences respectively (Crous & Groenewald 2013) by PAUP v. 4.0b10 (Swofford ) for maximum parsimony (MP), MrBayes v. 3.1.2 (Ronquist & Huelsenbeck 2003) for Bayesian inference (BI) and PhyML v. 7.2.8 (Guindon ) for maximum likelihood (ML). Sequence alignments were deposited at TreeBASE (www.treebase.org) under the accession number S22400. Taxonomic novelties were deposited in MycoBank (Crous ).
Table 1.
Arthrinium species included in the present study (in bold).
Species
Strains
Substrate
Location
ITS
TUB
TEF
A. arundinis
CBS 106.12
N/A
Germany
KF144883
KF144973
KF145015
CBS 114316
Hordeum vulgare
Iran
KF144884
KF144974
KF145016
CFCC 52305
Bamboo
China
MH197126
NA
NA
CFCC 52306
Bamboo
China
MH197127
NA
NA
CFCC 52307
Bamboo
China
MH197118
NA
NA
CFCC 52308
Bamboo
China
MH197119
NA
NA
A. aureum
CBS 244.83
Air
Spain
AB220251
KF144981
KF145023
A. gaoyouense
CFCC 52301
Phragmites australis
China
MH197124
MH236789
MH236793
CFCC 52302
Phragmites australis
China
MH197125
MH236790
MH236794
A. garethjonesii
KUMCC16-0202
Bamboo
China
KY356086
NA
NA
A. hydei
KUMCC 16-0204
Bambusa tuldoides
China
KY356087
NA
NA
CBS 114990
Bamboo
China
KF144890
KF144982
KF145024
A. hyphopodii
MFLUCC 15-0003
Bambusa tuldoides
China
KR069110
NA
NA
KUMCC 16-0201
Bamboo
China
KY356088
NA
NA
A. kogelbergense
CBS 113332
Cannomois virgata
South Africa
KF144891
KF144983
KF145025
CBS 113333
Restionaceae sp.
South Africa
KF144892
KF144984
KF145026
A. longistromum
MFLUCC 11-0479
Bamboo
Thailand
KU940142
NA
NA
MFLUCC 11-0481
Bamboo
Thailand
KU940141
NA
NA
A. malaysianum
CBS 102053
Macaranga hullettii
Malaysia
KF144896
KF144988
KF145030
CBS 251.29
Cinnamomum camphora
N/A
KF144897
KF144989
KF145031
A. marii
CBS 113535
Oats
Sweden
KF144898
KF144990
KF145032
CBS 114803
Arundinaria hindsi
China
KF144899
KF144991
KF145033
A. montagnei
ToD.7.1
Insect: Ips typographus
Sweden
FJ824610
NA
NA
VL170
Pinus mugo
Lithuania
JF440582
NA
NA
A. neosubglobosa
JHB006
Bamboo
China
KY356089
NA
NA
KUMCC 16-0203
Bamboo
China
KY356090
NA
NA
A. ovatum
CBS 115042
Arundinaria hindsii
China
KF144903
KF144995
KF145037
A. paraphaeospermum
MFLUCC 13-0644
Bamboo
Thailand
KX822128
NA
NA
CFCC 52309
Bamboo
China
MH197122
NA
NA
CFCC 52310
Bamboo
China
MH197123
NA
NA
A. phaeospermum
CBS 114314
Hordeum vulgare
Iran
KF144904
KF144996
KF145038
CBS 114315
Hordeum vulgare
Iran
KF144905
KF144997
KF145039
A. phragmites
CBS 135458
Phragmites australis
Italy
KF144909
KF145001
KF145043
A. pseudosinense
CBS 135459
Bamboo
Netherlands
KF144910
KF145044
A. pseudospegazzinii
CBS 102052
Macaranga hullettii
Malaysia
KF144911
KF145002
KF145045
A. pterospermum
CBS 123185
Machaerina sinclairii
New Zealand
KF144912
KF145003
CBS 134000
Machaerina sinclairii
Australia
KF144913
KF145004
KF145046
A. qinlingense
CFCC 52303
Fargesia qinlingensis
China
MH197120
MH236791
MH236795
CFCC 52304
Fargesia qinlingensis
China
MH197121
MH236792
MH236796
A. rasikravindrii
CBS 337.61
Cissus sp.
Netherlands
KF144914
NA
NA
MFLUCC 11-0616
Bamboo
Thailand
KU940144
NA
NA
A. sacchari
CBS 212.30
Phragmites australis
UK
KF144916
KF145005
KF145047
CBS 301.49
Bamboo
Indonesia
KF144917
KF145006
KF145048
A. saccharicola
CBS 191.73
Air
Netherlands
KF144920
KF145009
KF145051
CBS 463.83
Phragmites australis
Netherlands
KF144921
KF145010
KF145052
A. subglobosa
MFLUCC 11-0397
Bamboo
Thailand
KR069112
NA
NA
A. thailandicum
MFLUCC 15-0199
Bamboo
Thailand
KU940146
NA
NA
MFLUCC 15-0202
Bamboo
Thailand
KU940145
NA
NA
A. vietnamensis
IMI 99670
Citrus sinensis
Vietnam
KX986096
KY019466
NA
A. xenocordella
CBS 478.86
Soil
Zimbabwe
KF144925
NA
NA
CBS 595.66
Soil
Austria
KF144926
KF145013
KF145055
A. yunnanum
MFLU 15-0002
Phyllostachys nigra
China
KU940147
NA
NA
DDQ00281
Phyllostachys nigra
China
KU940148
NA
NA
CFCC 52311
Bamboo
China
MH191119
NA
NA
CFCC 52312
Bamboo
China
MH191120
NA
NA
Seiridium phylicae
CPC 19965
Phylica arborea
UK
KC005787
KC005821
KC005817
RESULTS
Phylogeny
The ITS alignment contained 56 ITS sequences (including one outgroup) with 716 characters including alignment gaps. Of these, 402 characters were constant, 75 variable characters were parsimony-uninformative and 239 characters were parsimony informative. The MP analysis resulted in five equally most parsimonious trees, with the first tree (TL = 735, CI = 0.638, RI = 0.866, RC = 0.553) shown in Fig. 1. The phylogenetic tree obtained from ML and BI with the MCMC algorithm was similar to the MP tree. Arthrinium qinlingense sp. nov. appeared in a distinct clade with high bootstrap support (Fig. 1). However, Arthrinium marii, A. gaoyouense sp. nov., A. longistromum and A. sacchari were not well-supported in the ITS phylogeny (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Phylogram of Arthrinium based on ITS. Values above the branches indicate maximum parsimony bootstrap (MP BP ≥ 50 %) and maximum likelihood bootstrap (ML BP ≥ 50 %). Values below the branches indicate posterior probabilities above 0.90 from BI. Scale bar = 20 nucleotide changes. The new sequences resulting from the current study are in blue.
The combined TEF and TUB alignment contained 26 sequences (including one outgroup) and 1 399 characters including alignment gaps; 518 of these were parsimony-informative, 219 were variable and parsimony-uninformative, and 632 were constant. The MP analysis resulted in a single most parsimonious tree (TL = 1719, CI = 0.678, RI = 0.791, RC = 0.536) shown in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Phylogram of Arthrinium based on combined TEF and TUB. Values above the branches indicate maximum parsimony bootstrap (MP BP ≥ 50 %) and maximum likelihood bootstrap (ML BP ≥ 50 %). Values below the branches indicate posterior probabilities above 0.90 from BI. Scale bar = 60 nucleotide changes. The new sequences resulting from the current study are in blue.
Taxonomy
C.M. Tian & N. Jiang, MycoBank MB824581. Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Morphology of A. gaoyouense from Phragmites australis (BJFC-S1413, holotype). A–C. Habit of conidiomata on a culm. D–E. Colonies on PDA. F–G. Conidiomata in culture. H–K. Conidiogenous cells giving rise to conidia. L–N. Conidia. Scale bars: A–C = 2 mm; F–G = 1 mm; H–N = 10 μm.
Etymology: gaoyouense, named after Gaoyou city, where the ex-type strain of this fungus was collected.Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Conidiomata 1–15 mm long, 0.5–5 mm wide, scattered to gregarious, superficial on leaf and culms. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells aggregated in clusters on hyphae, smooth, short and wide, 1–2 μm × 2–3 μm. Conidia brown, smooth, granular, globose to elongate ellipsoid in surface view, 5–8 μm diam, lenticular in side view, with pale equatorial slit, 4–8 μm diam in side view; with central basal scar, 1–2 μm diam. Brown, elongated cells seldom intermingled among conidia.Culture characteristics: On PDA, colonies are flat, spreading, with sparse aerial mycelium, olivaceous grey on surface, reverse smoke-grey with patches of olivaceous grey. Conidiomata formed after 20 d at 25 °C.Materials examined: China, Jiangsu Province, Gaoyou City, 32°47′25.10″N, 119°28′11.81″E, 2 m asl, on leaves and culms of Phragmites australis, 12 Oct. 2017, N. Jiang (holotype BJFC-S1411, ex-type culture CFCC 52301); Jiangsu Province, Gaoyou City, 32°47′25.10″N, 119°28′11.81″E, 2 m asl, on leaves and culms of P. australis, 12 Oct. 2017, N. Jiang (paratype BJFC-S1412, culture CFCC 52302).Notes: Two isolates of Arthrinium gaoyouense cluster in a well-supported clade (MP/ML/BI = 99/100/1) in Fig. 1 and (MP/ML/BI = 100/100/1) in Fig. 2. Arthrinium gaoyouense is phylogenetically closely related to Arthrinium marii, A. longistromum and A. sacchari in the ITS phylogram (Fig. 1). However, the branch length indicates that they are different species. In addition, Arthrinium gaoyouense differs from A. marii in having much smaller conidia in surface view (5–8 μm in A. gaoyouense vs. 8–13 μm in A. marii) and differs from A. sacchari in the size of its conidiogenous cells (1–2 μm × 2–3 μm in A. gaoyouense vs. 5–12 μm × 2.5–4 μm in A. marii), which is consistent with the results shown in TEF and TUB phylogram (Fig. 2).C.M. Tian & N. Jiang, MycoBank MB824582. Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Morphology of A. qinlingense from Fargesia qinlingensis (BJFC-S1411, holotype). A–B. Habit of conidiomata on a culm. C. Transverse sections through conidiomata. D. Longitudinal sections through conidiomata. E–F. Colonies on PDA. G. Conidiogenous cells giving rise to conidia. H–I. Conidia. Scale bars: A–D = 2 mm; G–I = 10 μm.
Etymology: qinlingense, named after the Qinling mountain range, where the ex-type strain of this fungus was collected.Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Conidiomata 1–4 mm long, 0.5–3 mm wide, up to 0.3 mm high, scattered, partly immersed, becoming erumpent to superficial, dark brown. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells aggregated in clusters on hyphae, smooth, short, 1–2 μm long. Conidia brown, smooth, granular, globose to suborbicular, 5–8 μm diam; with central basal scar, 1–2 μm diam.Culture characteristics: On PDA, colonies are fluffy, spreading, with sparse aerial mycelium, white on surface, reverse smoke-grey with patches of olivaceous grey. Conidiomata formed after 30 d at 25 °C.Materials examined: China, Shaanxi Province, Huoditang forest farm in Qinling mountain range, 33°18′22.30″N, 108°35′45.26″E, 1 820 m asl, on culms of Fargesia qinlingensis, 27 Jun. 2017, Ning Jiang (holotype BJFC-S1413, ex-type culture CFCC 52303); Shaanxi Province, Huoditang forest farm in Qinling mountain range, 33°18′22.30″N, 108°35′45.26″E, 1 820 m asl, on culms of Fargesia qinlingensis, 27 Jun. 2017, N. Jiang (paratype BJFC-S1414, living culture CFCC 52304).Notes: Two isolates of Arthrinium qinlingense cluster in a well-supported clade (MP/ML/BI = 100/100/1) in Fig. 1, and (MP/ML/BI = 100/100/1) in Fig. 2. The conidial size of A. qinlingense was similar to that of A. arundinis, A. malaysianum and A. thailandicum, so it is not easy to distinguish these four species based on morphology only. However, based on DNA sequence data (ITS, TUB and TEF), they can easily be separated.
DISCUSSION
In the present study we conducted a plant disease survey on bamboo and reed plantations in Jiangsu, Shaanxi and Shandong provinces in China. Culm rot of bamboo and reed was a common but not serious disease observed during the collection trip. In agreement with the previous observations and publications, casual agents were assigned to the genus Arthrinium (Zhang , Ma , Hu , Dai , Li , Dai ).Based on morphological observations and DNA sequence data, Arthrinium arundinis, A. paraphaeospermum, A. qinlingense and A. yunnanum were considered as the potential causal agents of bamboo culm rot, being associated with typical disease symptoms. Necrotic culms exhibited similar symptoms, but with some variation in detail (Fig. 4, 5). Conidiomata of Arthrinium arundinis and A. qinlingense were more gregarious than those of A. paraphaeospermum and A. yunnanum on the culms. The conidiomatal size of A. yunnanum on culms was less than 2 mm, being obviously smaller compared to those of the other three species. Additionally, conidial size proved useful but inconclusive for species identification: 5–7 μm in A. arundinis vs. 11–15 μm in A. paraphaeospermum vs. 5–8 μm in A. qinlingense vs. 10–16 μm in A. yunnanum. These morphological characteristics were thus not robust enough to distinguish the species occurring on bamboo, because there was considerable overlap in size. Dai proposed Arthrinium yunnanum as a new species based on a sexual morph on culms, and asexual morph in cultures. Conidia in culture (15.5–26.5 μm diam) were much larger than the conidia observed on culms in this study (10–16 μm diam). This leads us to conclude that morphology alone should no longer be seen as sufficient for distinguishing species of Arthrinium. This finding is in agreement with the observations of Crous & Groenewald (2013), who stated that species of Arthrinium species are highly variable morphologically, depending on the substrate and period of incubation, and that morphological features exhibited in vitro do not always match those observed in vivo.
Fig. 5.
Morphology of A. arundinis (A1–A6), A. paraphaeospermum (B1–B6), A. yunnanum (C1–C6) from bamboo in China. A1–C2. Habit of conidiomata on a culm. A3–C4. Colonies on PDA. A5–C5. Conidiomata in culture. A6–C6. Conidia. Scale bars: A1–C2 = 2 mm; A5–C6 = 10 μm.
Crous & Groenewald (2013) used ITS sequence data to perform species identification, and combined TEF and TUB alignments to resolve species complexes in Arthrinium. In this study, the ITS phylogenetic backbone tree separated the four species from bamboo and one from reeds. Additionally, a phylogeny based on combined TEF and TUB alignments was performed to confirm the monophyly of Arthrinium gaoyouense and A. qinlingense.This study showed that the 12 isolates from bamboo and reed plants represent five distinct species of Arthrinium, meaning that different fungal pathogens are associated with culm rot symptoms in China. Further studies are now required, however, to confirm pathogenicity.
Authors: Martina Réblová; Andrew N Miller; Amy Y Rossman; Keith A Seifert; Pedro W Crous; David L Hawksworth; Mohamed A Abdel-Wahab; Paul F Cannon; Dinushani A Daranagama; Z Wilhelm De Beer; Shi-Ke Huang; Kevin D Hyde; Ruvvishika Jayawardena; Walter Jaklitsch; E B Gareth Jones; Yu-Ming Ju; Caroline Judith; Sajeewa S N Maharachchikumbura; Ka-Lai Pang; Liliane E Petrini; Huzefa A Raja; Andrea I Romero; Carol Shearer; Indunil C Senanayake; Hermann Voglmayr; Bevan S Weir; Nalin N Wijayawarden Journal: IMA Fungus Date: 2016-06-08 Impact factor: 3.515
Authors: Xia Tang; Ishani D Goonasekara; Ruvishika S Jayawardena; Hong Bo Jiang; Jun F Li; Kevin D Hyde; Ji C Kang Journal: Biodivers Data J Date: 2020-12-14
Authors: Abdul Qayoom Majeedano; Jie Chen; Tianhui Zhu; Shujiang Li; Zeeshan Ghulam Nabi Gishkori; Sumbul Mureed Mastoi; Gang Wang Journal: J Fungi (Basel) Date: 2022-03-02