Literature DB >> 32467445

A Root Cause Analysis of Barriers to Timely Colonoscopy in California Safety-Net Health Systems.

Anjana E Sharma, Helena C Lyson, Roy Cherian1, Ma Somsouk, Dean Schillinger, Urmimala Sarkar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Safety-net health care systems, serving vulnerable populations, see longer delays to timely colonoscopy after a positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT), which may contribute to existing disparities. We sought to identify root causes of colonoscopy delay after positive FOBT result in the primary care safety net.
METHODS: We conducted a multisite root cause analysis of cases of delayed colonoscopy, identifying cases where there was a delay of greater than 6 months in completing or scheduling a follow-up colonoscopy after a positive FOBT. We identified cases across 5 California health systems serving low-income, vulnerable populations. We developed a semistructured interview guide based on precedent work. We conducted telephone individual interviews with primary care providers (PCPs) and patients. We then performed qualitative content analysis of the interviews, using an integrated inductive-deductive analytic approach, to identify themes related to recurrent root causes of colonoscopy delay.
RESULTS: We identified 12 unique cases, comprising 5 patient and 11 PCP interviews. Eight patients completed colonoscopy; median time to colonoscopy was 11.0 months (interquartile range, 6.3 months). Three patients had advanced adenomatous findings. Primary care providers highlighted system-level root causes, including inability to track referrals between primary care and gastroenterology, lack of protocols to follow up with patients, lack of electronic medical record interoperability, and lack of time or staffing resources, compelling tremendous additional effort by staff. In contrast, patients' highlighted individual-level root causes included comorbidities, social needs, and misunderstanding the importance of the FOBT. There was a little overlap between PCP and patient-elicited root causes.
CONCLUSIONS: Current protocols do not accommodate communication between primary care and gastroenterology. Interventions to address specific barriers identified include improved interoperability between PCP and gastroenterology scheduling systems, protocols to follow-up on incomplete colonoscopies, accommodation for support and transport needs, and patient-friendly education. Interviewing both patients and PCPs leads to richer analysis of the root causes leading to delayed diagnosis of colorectal cancer.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 32467445      PMCID: PMC7688501          DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Patient Saf        ISSN: 1549-8417            Impact factor:   2.243


  23 in total

1.  Inadequate Utilization of Diagnostic Colonoscopy Following Abnormal FIT Results in an Integrated Safety-Net System.

Authors:  Rachel B Issaka; Maneesh H Singh; Sachiko M Oshima; Victoria J Laleau; Carly D Rachocki; Ellen H Chen; Lukejohn W Day; Urmimala Sarkar; Ma Somsouk
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Colorectal Cancer Trends in California and the Need for Greater Screening of Hispanic Men.

Authors:  Robert P Martinsen; Cyllene R Morris; Paulo S Pinheiro; Arti Parikh-Patel; Kenneth W Kizer
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Racial-Ethnic Disparities in Late-Stage Colorectal Cancer Among Hispanics and Non-Hispanic Whites of New Mexico.

Authors:  Melissa Gonzales; Fares Qeadan; Shiraz I Mishra; Ashwani Rajput; Richard M Hoffman
Journal:  Hisp Health Care Int       Date:  2017-12

4.  Effects of health insurance and race on colorectal cancer treatments and outcomes.

Authors:  R G Roetzheim; N Pal; E C Gonzalez; J M Ferrante; D J Van Durme; J P Krischer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Organizational predictors of colonoscopy follow-up for positive fecal occult blood test results: an observational study.

Authors:  Melissa R Partin; Diana J Burgess; James F Burgess; Amy Gravely; David Haggstrom; Sarah E Lillie; Sean Nugent; Adam A Powell; Aasma Shaukat; Louise C Walter; David B Nelson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Root Cause Analysis of Ambulatory Adverse Drug Events That Present to the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Sarah A Gertler; Zlatan Coralic; Andrea López; John C Stein; Urmimala Sarkar
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Barriers to screening colonoscopy for low-income Latino and white patients in an urban community health center.

Authors:  Alexander R Green; Angelleen Peters-Lewis; Sanja Percac-Lima; Joseph R Betancourt; James M Richter; Maria-Pamela R Janairo; Gloria B Gamba; Steven J Atlas
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Consequences of Increasing Time to Colonoscopy Examination After Positive Result From Fecal Colorectal Cancer Screening Test.

Authors:  Reinier G S Meester; Ann G Zauber; Chyke A Doubeni; Christopher D Jensen; Virginia P Quinn; Mark Helfand; Jason A Dominitz; Theodore R Levin; Douglas A Corley; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Association Between Time to Colonoscopy After a Positive Fecal Test Result and Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Cancer Stage at Diagnosis.

Authors:  Douglas A Corley; Christopher D Jensen; Virginia P Quinn; Chyke A Doubeni; Ann G Zauber; Jeffrey K Lee; Joanne E Schottinger; Amy R Marks; Wei K Zhao; Nirupa R Ghai; Alexander T Lee; Richard Contreras; Charles P Quesenberry; Bruce H Fireman; Theodore R Levin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Interventions to Improve Follow-up of Positive Results on Fecal Blood Tests: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kevin Selby; Christine Baumgartner; Theodore R Levin; Chyke A Doubeni; Ann G Zauber; Joanne Schottinger; Christopher D Jensen; Jeffrey K Lee; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  2 in total

1.  Barriers associated with inadequate follow-up of abnormal fecal immunochemical test results in a safety-net system: A mixed-methods analysis.

Authors:  Rachel B Issaka; Ari Bell-Brown; Jason Kao; Cyndy Snyder; Dana L Atkins; Lisa D Chew; Bryan J Weiner; Lisa Strate; John M Inadomi; Scott D Ramsey
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-05-18

2.  Perceptions on Barriers and Facilitators to Colonoscopy Completion After Abnormal Fecal Immunochemical Test Results in a Safety Net System.

Authors:  Rachel B Issaka; Ari Bell-Brown; Cyndy Snyder; Dana L Atkins; Lisa Chew; Bryan J Weiner; Lisa Strate; John M Inadomi; Scott D Ramsey
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-08-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.